• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最大限度耐受的白消安全身暴露与氟达拉滨联合预处理异基因造血细胞移植。

Maximally tolerated busulfan systemic exposure in combination with fludarabine as conditioning before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

机构信息

Department of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.

出版信息

Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012 Jul;18(7):1099-107. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.12.584. Epub 2011 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.12.584
PMID:22198540
Abstract

Systemic exposure to high-dose busulfan has been correlated with efficacy and toxicity after hematopoietic cell transplantation for malignancy. We used the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) to prospectively determine the maximally tolerated systemic exposure to i.v. busulfan when given once daily after fludarabine administered at 40 mg/m(2) for 4 days. Three target AUC levels were planned: 6,000, 7,500, and 9,000 μM-min. Included were patients 16 to 65 years old, with a hematologic malignancy, an HLA A, B, or C, DRB1 8/8 or 7/8 matched donor, Karnofsky performance status ≥70%, and adequate organ function. For level 1 patients, i.v. busulfan doses 1 and 2 were 170 mg/m(2)/day, then doses 3 and 4 were adjusted based on first-dose pharmacokinetic modeling to achieve an average daily AUC of 6,000 μM-min. Doses 1 and 2 for the subsequent cohorts were based on the level 1 data: 180 mg/m(2)/day for AUC 7,500 μM-min (level 2) and 220 mg/m(2)/day for AUC 9,000 μM-min (level 3), with pharmacokinetic targeting for doses 3 and 4. Pharmacokinetic analysis after the last dose showed that 88% of the patients had been exposed to a mean AUC within 10% of the target. Forty patients were treated at level 1, 29 patients at level 2, and three patients at level 3. DLT was veno-occlusive disease of the liver, which occurred in none of 40 patients (0%) at level 1, two of 29 patients (7%) at level 2, and three of three patients (100%) at level 3. Dermatitis (P < .01) and pulmonary toxicity (P = .01) were also increased at higher AUC levels. Level 2 (7,500 μM-min × 4 days) was the maximally tolerated AUC. Within the confines of the trial's small sample size, there was no suggestion that escalating busulfan AUC from 6,000 to 7,500 μM-min × 4 days increased nonrelapse mortality. Assessment of the higher busulfan AUC on relapse prevention requires trials in patients with a homogeneous risk of relapse.

摘要

全身暴露于高剂量白消安与恶性血液病造血细胞移植后的疗效和毒性相关。我们采用浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)来前瞻性确定在氟达拉滨 40mg/m² 连续 4 天后每天静脉给予白消安时的最大耐受全身暴露量。计划了 3 个目标 AUC 水平:6000、7500 和 9000μM-min。纳入标准为年龄 16-65 岁、血液恶性肿瘤、HLA A、B 或 C、DRB1 8/8 或 7/8 匹配供体、卡氏功能状态评分≥70%和足够的器官功能。对于 1 级患者,静脉给予白消安剂量 1 和 2 为 170mg/m²/天,然后根据首次剂量药代动力学模型调整剂量 3 和 4,以达到 6000μM-min 的平均日 AUC。随后队列的剂量 1 和 2 基于 1 级数据:AUC 为 7500μM-min(2 级)的 180mg/m²/天和 AUC 为 9000μM-min(3 级)的 220mg/m²/天,剂量 3 和 4 进行药代动力学靶向。最后一剂后的药代动力学分析显示,88%的患者暴露于目标值 10%以内的平均 AUC。40 名患者接受了 1 级治疗,29 名患者接受了 2 级治疗,3 名患者接受了 3 级治疗。剂量限制性毒性为肝静脉闭塞性疾病,1 级 40 名患者中无(0%)发生,2 级 29 名患者中 2 名(7%)发生,3 级 3 名患者中 3 名(100%)发生。更高 AUC 水平时还会出现皮疹(P<.01)和肺部毒性(P=.01)。2 级(7500μM-min×4 天)是最大耐受 AUC。在试验样本量小的范围内,没有证据表明从 6000 增加到 7500μM-min×4 天的白消安 AUC 会增加非复发死亡率。评估更高的白消安 AUC 对预防复发的作用需要在复发风险同质的患者中进行试验。

相似文献

1
Maximally tolerated busulfan systemic exposure in combination with fludarabine as conditioning before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.最大限度耐受的白消安全身暴露与氟达拉滨联合预处理异基因造血细胞移植。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012 Jul;18(7):1099-107. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.12.584. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
2
Phase I/II Trial of Dose-Escalated Busulfan Delivered by Prolonged Continuous Infusion in Allogeneic Transplant Patients.异基因移植患者中延长持续输注递增剂量白消安的I/II期试验
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Dec;21(12):2129-2135. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.07.016. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
3
Once-daily intravenous busulfan given with fludarabine as conditioning for allogeneic stem cell transplantation: study of pharmacokinetics and early clinical outcomes.氟达拉滨联合每日一次静脉注射白消安作为异基因干细胞移植预处理的研究:药代动力学及早期临床结局分析
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2002;8(9):468-76. doi: 10.1053/bbmt.2002.v8.pm12374451.
4
Development and validation of a test dose strategy for once-daily i.v. busulfan: importance of fixed infusion rate dosing.开发并验证了一种每日一次静脉注射白消安的测试剂量策略:固定输注率给药的重要性。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012 Feb;18(2):295-301. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.07.015. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
5
Pharmacokinetic targeting of i.v. BU with fludarabine as conditioning before hematopoietic cell transplant: the effect of first-dose area under the concentration time curve on transplant-related outcomes.静脉注射 BU 联合氟达拉滨预处理行造血干细胞移植的药代动力学靶向治疗:首剂量浓度时间曲线下面积对移植相关结局的影响。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011 Nov;46(11):1418-25. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2010.315. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
6
High busulfan exposure is associated with worse outcomes in a daily i.v. busulfan and fludarabine allogeneic transplant regimen.在每日静脉注射白消安和氟达拉滨的异基因移植方案中,高剂量白消安暴露与更差的预后相关。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008 Feb;14(2):220-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.10.028.
7
Establishing a target exposure for once-daily intravenous busulfan given with fludarabine and thymoglobulin before allogeneic transplantation.确立异基因移植前给予氟达拉滨和胸腺球蛋白的每日一次静脉注射白消安的目标暴露量。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013 Sep;19(9):1381-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
8
A phase I study of CPX-351 in combination with busulfan and fludarabine conditioning and allogeneic stem cell transplantation in adult patients with refractory acute leukemia.CPX-351 联合白消安和氟达拉滨预处理及异基因造血干细胞移植治疗成人难治性急性白血病的 I 期研究。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013 Jul;19(7):1040-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 May 4.
9
Highly variable pharmacokinetics of once-daily intravenous busulfan when combined with fludarabine in pediatric patients: phase I clinical study for determination of optimal once-daily busulfan dose using pharmacokinetic modeling.当每日一次静脉注射白消安与氟达拉滨联合使用时,在儿科患者中表现出高度可变的药代动力学:使用药代动力学模型确定最佳每日一次白消安剂量的 I 期临床研究。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012 Jun;18(6):944-50. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.11.025. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
10
Phase I study of dose-escalated busulfan with fludarabine and alemtuzumab as conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant: reduced clearance at high doses and occurrence of late sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease.一项剂量递增的白消安联合氟达拉滨和阿仑单抗作为异基因造血干细胞移植预处理方案的 I 期研究:高剂量时清除率降低,以及迟发性窦状隙阻塞综合征/静脉阻塞性疾病的发生。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2010 Dec;51(12):2240-9. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2010.520773. Epub 2010 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Determination of Busulfan and Melphalan in Plasma by Turbulent Flow Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.采用湍流流色谱-串联质谱法测定血浆中的白消安和马法兰。
Methods Mol Biol. 2024;2737:141-151. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3541-4_14.
2
Precision dosing of intravenous busulfan in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Results from a multicenter population pharmacokinetic study.儿科造血干细胞移植中静脉注射白消安的精准剂量:一项多中心群体药代动力学研究的结果。
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2021 Sep;10(9):1043-1056. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12683. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
3
The pulmonary metatranscriptome prior to pediatric HCT identifies post-HCT lung injury.
在儿科造血干细胞移植前的肺部宏转录组可识别移植后肺部损伤。
Blood. 2021 Mar 25;137(12):1679-1689. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020009246.
4
Comparison of fixed dose reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine and busulfan to PK-guided busulfan AUC (FluBu4K) in hematopoietic stem cell transplant for AML/MDS.在急性髓系白血病/骨髓增生异常综合征造血干细胞移植中,氟达拉滨与白消安固定剂量减低强度预处理与基于药代动力学(PK)指导的白消安曲线下面积(FluBu4K)的比较。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2021 Apr;62(4):944-951. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1849677. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
5
Predicting the presence and mechanism of busulfan drug-drug interactions in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using pharmacokinetic interaction network-based molecular structure similarity and network pharmacology.利用基于药代动力学相互作用网络的分子结构相似性和网络药理学预测造血干细胞移植中白消安药物相互作用的存在及机制。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Apr;77(4):595-605. doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-03034-4. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
6
Population pharmacokinetic analysis of intravenous busulfan: GSTA1 genotype is not a predictive factor of initial dose in Chinese adult patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.静脉注射白消安的群体药代动力学分析:GSTA1 基因型不是中国成年造血干细胞移植患者初始剂量的预测因素。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2020 Feb;85(2):293-308. doi: 10.1007/s00280-019-04001-2. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
7
Measurement of the DNA alkylating agents busulfan and melphalan in human plasma by mass spectrometry.采用质谱法测定人血浆中的 DNA 烷化剂白消安和美法仑。
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2019 Sep 1;1125:121711. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2019.121711. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
8
Harmonization of Busulfan Plasma Exposure Unit (BPEU): A Community-Initiated Consensus Statement.《协调白消安血浆暴露单位(BPEU):社区发起的共识声明》。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Sep;25(9):1890-1897. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.05.021. Epub 2019 May 25.
9
Incorporation of GSTA1 genetic variations into a population pharmacokinetic model for IV busulfan in paediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.将 GSTA1 遗传变异纳入儿童造血干细胞移植中 IV 布美他尼的群体药代动力学模型。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Jul;84(7):1494-1504. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13566. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
10
Chimerism in Myeloid Malignancies following Stem Cell Transplantation Using FluBu4 with and without Busulfan Pharmacokinetics versus BuCy.使用含氟马磷酰胺(FluBu4)联合或不联合白消安的干细胞移植后髓系恶性肿瘤中的嵌合体:白消安药代动力学与白消安-环磷酰胺方案对比
Adv Hematol. 2017;2017:8690416. doi: 10.1155/2017/8690416. Epub 2017 Nov 8.