Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida 32224, USA.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar;75(3):525-33. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.024. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
Residual neoplasia after EMR of colorectal lesions is common. There is a critical need for imaging methods to accurately diagnose residual disease and to guide retreatment in real time.
The aim was to estimate and compare the accuracy of virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE) and probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) for detection of residual neoplastic tissue at the site of prior EMR.
Prospective, blind, pilot comparison of advanced endoscopic imaging (VCE and pCLE) by using matching histology as reference standard.
Three tertiary-care referral hospitals.
This study involved 92 participants who underwent follow-up colonoscopies for the evaluation of prior EMR sites within 1 year.
The EMR scars were assessed during follow-up high-resolution colonoscopy by using VCE (narrow-band imaging/Fujinon Intelligent Color Enhancement [FICE]), and pCLE. Confocal videos of EMR scars were interpreted in real time and were also stored and reviewed offline, blinded to histopathology and endoscopic appearance. Tissue confirmation by biopsies or polypectomy/repeat EMR was performed in all cases.
Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for VCE and pCLE alone and in combination against histopathology as the standard reference standard.
Among 129 EMR scars, residual neoplasia was confirmed by histology in 29 sites (22%). For VCE, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were 72%, 77%, 49%, 91%, and 77%, respectively, and were 97%, 77%, 55%, 99%, and 81% for pCLE (P = .045 for sensitivity). When only EMR scars for which VCE and pCLE agreed on the diagnosis were analyzed (95/129 scars), the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of pCLE and VCE were 90%, 100%, 87%, 67%, and 100%, respectively.
Small sample size, lack of power, involvement of highly experienced pCLE experts.
Confocal endomicroscopy significantly increases the sensitivity for detecting residual neoplasia after colorectal EMR compared with endoscopy alone. When confocal endomicroscopy is used in combination with VCE, the accuracy is extremely high, and sensitivity approaches that of histopathology. Together, they may reduce the need for histologic examination and allow a highly accurate on-table decision to treat again or not, thus avoiding unnecessary repeat procedures. (
00874263.).
结直肠病变内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)后残留肿瘤很常见。迫切需要影像学方法来准确诊断残留疾病,并实时指导再次治疗。
旨在评估和比较虚拟染色内镜(VCE)和基于探头的共聚焦激光内镜检查(pCLE)在检测先前 EMR 部位残留肿瘤组织方面的准确性。
前瞻性、盲法、高级内镜成像(VCE 和 pCLE)的初步比较,以匹配的组织学作为参考标准。
三家三级转诊医院。
本研究纳入了 92 名参与者,他们在 1 年内接受了结肠镜检查以评估先前 EMR 部位。
在随访的高分辨率结肠镜检查中,通过 VCE(窄带成像/Fujinon 智能色彩增强[FICE])和 pCLE 评估 EMR 疤痕。实时解释 EMR 疤痕的共聚焦视频,并将其存储和离线回顾,对组织病理学和内镜表现进行盲法。所有病例均通过活检或息肉切除术/重复 EMR 进行组织确认。
VCE 和 pCLE 单独和联合检测与组织病理学作为标准参考标准的敏感性、特异性和准确性。
在 129 个 EMR 疤痕中,29 个部位(22%)的组织学证实存在残留肿瘤。对于 VCE,敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和准确性分别为 72%、77%、49%、91%和 77%,而 pCLE 则分别为 97%、77%、55%、99%和 81%(P =.045 为敏感性)。当仅分析 VCE 和 pCLE 对诊断一致的 EMR 疤痕(95/129 个疤痕)时,pCLE 和 VCE 的准确性、敏感性、特异性、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 90%、100%、87%、67%和 100%。
样本量小,缺乏动力,涉及经验丰富的 pCLE 专家。
与单独内镜检查相比,共聚焦内镜显著提高了结直肠 EMR 后检测残留肿瘤的敏感性。当共聚焦内镜与 VCE 联合使用时,准确性极高,且敏感性接近组织病理学。两者结合可能减少对组织学检查的需求,并允许在进行高准确性的表上决策,是否再次治疗,从而避免不必要的重复程序。(临床试验注册号:00874263.)