Department of Emergency Medicine, Advocate Christ Medical Center, Oak Lawn, IL, USA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Jan;59(1):13-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.06.545. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
Multiple studies have linked emergency department (ED) crowding to delays in patient care, such as treatment with antibiotics and analgesics. Multiple studies have also demonstrated the benefit of timely percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We therefore study whether increased occupancy rates in our community ED might correlate with delays in door-to-balloon time for patients with acute STEMI who are referred for emergency percutaneous coronary intervention.
This study was a single-institution prospective observational study. For every patient arriving in our ED from June 2007 through October 2009 with acute STEMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention, we measured the ED occupancy rate on arrival and the door-to-balloon time and determined the correlation between these variables in univariate and multivariate analyses controlling for patient characteristics, occupancy rate, times to ECG and catheter laboratory activation, and the availability of the catheterization laboratory team (in-house versus on-call).
During the study period, 210 patients were treated with emergency percutaneous coronary intervention in accordance with the hospital protocol. For these patients, the mean ED occupancy rate at arrival was 127% (range 28% to 214%). The mean time to balloon inflation was 65 minutes (range 25 to 142 minutes). The time to balloon inflation did not significantly change with increasing occupancy rate in univariate analysis (Spearman's correlation -0.02; 95% confidence interval -0.13 to 0.11) or in multivariate analysis, with the only significant variable being the availability of the catheterization laboratory team in house, which was associated with reduced time to balloon inflation.
Times to achieve emergency percutaneous coronary intervention for acute STEMI do not correlate positively with crowding as measured by the occupancy rate in our ED.
多项研究表明,急诊科(ED)拥挤与患者治疗延迟有关,例如抗生素和镇痛药的治疗。多项研究还表明,对于急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者,及时进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗有获益。因此,我们研究了社区 ED 入住率的增加是否与接受紧急经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性 STEMI 患者的门球时间延迟有关。
这是一项单机构前瞻性观察研究。对于 2007 年 6 月至 2009 年 10 月期间因急性 STEMI 入住我院 ED 并接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的每位患者,我们测量了患者到达时 ED 的入住率和门球时间,并在控制患者特征、入住率、心电图和导管实验室激活时间以及导管实验室团队的可用性(内部与随叫随到)的单变量和多变量分析中确定这些变量之间的相关性。
在研究期间,根据医院方案对 210 例患者进行了紧急经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。对于这些患者,到达时 ED 的平均入住率为 127%(范围 28%至 214%)。球囊充气的平均时间为 65 分钟(范围 25 至 142 分钟)。在单变量分析中,球囊充气时间与入住率的增加无显著相关性(Spearman 相关系数-0.02;95%置信区间-0.13 至 0.11),在多变量分析中也是如此,唯一显著的变量是导管实验室团队的可用性,这与球囊充气时间的缩短有关。
在我们的 ED 中,用入住率来衡量的拥挤程度与急性 STEMI 实现紧急经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的时间无正相关关系。