Suppr超能文献

基层医疗中个人数据的研究与保护

[Research and protection of personal data in Primary Care].

作者信息

Garrido Elustondo Sofía, Cabello Ballesteros Luisa, Galende Domínguez Inés, Riesgo Fuertes Rosario, Rodríguez Barrientos Ricardo, Polentinos Castro Elena

机构信息

Técnico de Salud, Unidad Docente Multiprofesional de Atención Familiar y Comunitaria Sureste de la Gerencia de Atención Primaria de Madrid, Madrid, España.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2012 Mar;44(3):172-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2011.02.009. Epub 2011 Jul 29.

Abstract

Research is one of the fundamental functions that have to be carried out in Primary Care. The clinical information stored in different records arising from medical care is a basic tool for this activity. The use of personal data for the purposes of research is legitimate according to our laws; however, this information must be treated confidentially at all times. Two alternatives are available for this. One is to obtain the informed consent of the patient, and the other is to dissociate the handling of the information. But in some situations, the compliance to legal demands when obtaining data for research is not easy, there being a series of obstacles which in many cases makes it impossible to carry out research. In this article, we will give guidance on how to access the information contained in records while respecting the rights of the patient and the current legislation.

摘要

研究是基层医疗必须开展的基本职能之一。医疗过程中存储在不同记录里的临床信息是这项活动的基本工具。根据我国法律,为研究目的使用个人数据是合法的;然而,这些信息必须始终得到保密处理。对此有两种选择。一种是获得患者的知情同意,另一种是使信息处理脱钩。但在某些情况下,为研究获取数据时遵守法律要求并非易事,存在一系列障碍,在许多情况下使得无法开展研究。在本文中,我们将就如何在尊重患者权利和现行法律的同时获取记录中包含的信息提供指导。

相似文献

1
[Research and protection of personal data in Primary Care].
Aten Primaria. 2012 Mar;44(3):172-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2011.02.009. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
3
4
Research using electronic health records: Balancing confidentiality and public good.
J Prim Health Care. 2018 Dec;10(4):288-291. doi: 10.1071/HC18040.
5
[Ethics guidelines for the creation and use of registries for biomedical research purposes].
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2008 Jan-Feb;82(1):21-42. doi: 10.1590/s1135-57272008000100003.
6
[Accessing medical records for research purposes].
Rev Derecho Genoma Hum. 2013 Jul-Dec(39):137-72.
8
New European guidelines for the use of stored human biological materials in biomedical research.
J Med Ethics. 2004 Feb;30(1):99-103. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.003467.
9
Requiring consent vs. waiving consent for medical records research: a Minnesota law vs. the U.S. (HIPAA) privacy rule.
Health Care Anal. 2003 Sep;11(3):207-18. doi: 10.1023/B:HCAN.0000005493.21521.42.
10
[Use of Electronic Medical Records for Research: New Ethical Challenges and Possible Solutions].
Acta Med Port. 2019 May 31;32(5):332-334. doi: 10.20344/amp.11280.

本文引用的文献

2
Research on medical records without informed consent.
J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Fall;36(3):560-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.304.x.
3
Whose interest? British newspaper reporting of use of medical records for research.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008 Jul;13(3):140-5. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.007126.
4
[Ethics guidelines for the creation and use of registries for biomedical research purposes].
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2008 Jan-Feb;82(1):21-42. doi: 10.1590/s1135-57272008000100003.
6
Patient records. Privacy rule creates bottleneck for U.S. biomedical researchers.
Science. 2004 Jul 9;305(5681):168-9. doi: 10.1126/science.305.5681.168.
7
Registry research and medical privacy.
N Engl J Med. 2004 Apr 1;350(14):1452-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe048027.
8
[Research in primary care?].
Aten Primaria. 2003 Mar 31;31(5):281-4. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(03)79179-3.
9
Data protection legislation: interpretation and barriers to research.
BMJ. 2000 Oct 7;321(7265):890-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7265.890.
10
[Investigation and primary care].
Aten Primaria. 1999 May;23 Suppl 1:66-70.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验