• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国牛肉生产的环境影响:1977 年与 2007 年的比较。

The environmental impact of beef production in the United States: 1977 compared with 2007.

机构信息

Department of Animal Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164, USA.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 2011 Dec;89(12):4249-61. doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-3784. Epub 2011 Jul 29.

DOI:10.2527/jas.2010-3784
PMID:21803973
Abstract

Consumers often perceive that the modern beef production system has an environmental impact far greater than that of historical systems, with improved efficiency being achieved at the expense of greenhouse gas emissions. The objective of this study was to compare the environmental impact of modern (2007) US beef production with production practices characteristic of the US beef system in 1977. A deterministic model based on the metabolism and nutrient requirements of the beef population was used to quantify resource inputs and waste outputs per billion kilograms of beef. Both the modern and historical production systems were modeled using characteristic management practices, population dynamics, and production data from US beef systems. Modern beef production requires considerably fewer resources than the equivalent system in 1977, with 69.9% of animals, 81.4% of feedstuffs, 87.9% of the water, and only 67.0% of the land required to produce 1 billion kg of beef. Waste outputs were similarly reduced, with modern beef systems producing 81.9% of the manure, 82.3% CH(4), and 88.0% N(2)O per billion kilograms of beef compared with production systems in 1977. The C footprint per billion kilograms of beef produced in 2007 was reduced by 16.3% compared with equivalent beef production in 1977. As the US population increases, it is crucial to continue the improvements in efficiency demonstrated over the past 30 yr to supply the market demand for safe, affordable beef while reducing resource use and mitigating environmental impact.

摘要

消费者通常认为,现代牛肉生产系统对环境的影响远远大于历史系统,其提高的效率是以温室气体排放为代价的。本研究的目的是比较现代(2007 年)美国牛肉生产与 1977 年美国牛肉系统生产实践的环境影响。基于牛肉种群的新陈代谢和营养需求,使用确定性模型来量化每十亿公斤牛肉的资源投入和废物产出。现代和历史生产系统都使用美国牛肉系统的典型管理实践、种群动态和生产数据进行建模。现代牛肉生产所需的资源比 1977 年的等效系统少得多,生产 10 亿公斤牛肉所需的动物数量为 69.9%,饲料数量为 81.4%,水数量为 87.9%,土地数量仅为 67.0%。废物产出也相应减少,现代牛肉系统每生产 10 亿公斤牛肉产生的粪便、CH4 和 N2O 分别为 81.9%、82.3%和 88.0%,而 1977 年的生产系统则为 81.9%、82.3%和 88.0%。与 1977 年同等牛肉生产相比,2007 年每生产 10 亿公斤牛肉的碳足迹减少了 16.3%。随着美国人口的增加,至关重要的是要继续提高过去 30 年来的效率,以供应市场对安全、负担得起的牛肉的需求,同时减少资源使用并减轻环境影响。

相似文献

1
The environmental impact of beef production in the United States: 1977 compared with 2007.美国牛肉生产的环境影响:1977 年与 2007 年的比较。
J Anim Sci. 2011 Dec;89(12):4249-61. doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-3784. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
2
The environmental impact of dairy production: 1944 compared with 2007.乳制品生产的环境影响:1944年与2007年的对比
J Anim Sci. 2009 Jun;87(6):2160-7. doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-1781. Epub 2009 Mar 13.
3
The environmental and economic impact of removing growth-enhancing technologies from U.S. beef production.去除美国牛肉生产中促进生长的技术的环境和经济影响。
J Anim Sci. 2012 Oct;90(10):3527-37. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4870. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
4
A simulation-based approach for evaluating and comparing the environmental footprints of beef production systems.一种基于模拟的方法,用于评估和比较牛肉生产系统的环境足迹。
J Anim Sci. 2013 Nov;91(11):5427-37. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6506. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
5
Carbon footprint and ammonia emissions of California beef production systems.加利福尼亚州牛肉生产系统的碳足迹和氨排放。
J Anim Sci. 2012 Dec;90(12):4641-55. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4653. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
6
Growth-promoting technologies decrease the carbon footprint, ammonia emissions, and costs of California beef production systems.促生长技术降低了加利福尼亚牛肉生产系统的碳足迹、氨气排放和成本。
J Anim Sci. 2012 Dec;90(12):4656-65. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4654. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
7
A comparison of the environmental impact of Jersey compared with Holstein milk for cheese production.泽西奶与荷斯坦奶生产奶酪的环境影响比较。
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Jan;95(1):165-76. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4360.
8
An environmental, economic, and social assessment of improving cattle finishing weight or average daily gain within U.S. beef production.改善美国牛肉生产中牛育肥体重或平均日增重的环境、经济和社会评估。
J Anim Sci. 2013 Dec;91(12):5801-12. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6632. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
9
The effects of improved performance in the U.S. dairy cattle industry on environmental impacts between 2007 and 2017.2007 年至 2017 年期间,美国奶牛养殖业生产性能提高对环境影响的分析。
J Anim Sci. 2020 Jan 1;98(1). doi: 10.1093/jas/skz291.
10
Effect of farming practices for greenhouse gas mitigation and subsequent alternative land use on environmental impacts of beef cattle production systems.为减少温室气体排放而采取的农业措施以及随后的替代土地利用对肉牛生产系统的环境影响。
Animal. 2013 May;7(5):860-9. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112002200. Epub 2012 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Pens of commercial feedlot cattle with better health and performance have lower estimated greenhouse gas emissions intensity.健康状况和生产性能更佳的商业饲养场肉牛围栏,其估计的温室气体排放强度更低。
Transl Anim Sci. 2025 Jun 27;9:txaf087. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaf087. eCollection 2025.
2
Galyean Appreciation Club review: knowledge gaps in the nutrition of grazing beef cattle.加利安赞赏俱乐部评论:放牧肉牛营养方面的知识差距。
J Anim Sci. 2025 Jan 4;103. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaf172.
3
US grass-fed beef is as carbon intensive as industrial beef and ≈10-fold more intensive than common protein-dense alternatives.
美国草饲牛肉的碳密集度与工业化牛肉相当,比常见的高蛋白替代物高出约10倍。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Mar 25;122(12):e2404329122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2404329122. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
4
Exploring Feed Efficiency in Beef Cattle: From Data Collection to Genetic and Nutritional Modeling.探索肉牛的饲料效率:从数据收集到遗传与营养建模
Animals (Basel). 2024 Dec 17;14(24):3633. doi: 10.3390/ani14243633.
5
Does the Use of the Yeast Probiotic Actisaf Sc 47 Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Beef Cattle? A Study Based on Life Cycle Assessment.使用酵母益生菌Actisaf Sc 47是否能减少肉牛养殖对环境的影响?一项基于生命周期评估的研究。
Animals (Basel). 2024 Oct 28;14(21):3107. doi: 10.3390/ani14213107.
6
Mitochondrial Abundance and Function Differ Across Muscle Within Species.物种内不同肌肉的线粒体丰度和功能存在差异。
Metabolites. 2024 Oct 16;14(10):553. doi: 10.3390/metabo14100553.
7
Exploring putative enteric methanogenesis inhibitors using molecular simulations and a graph neural network.利用分子模拟和图神经网络探索潜在的肠道甲烷生成抑制剂。
bioRxiv. 2024 Sep 16:2024.09.16.613350. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.16.613350.
8
Climate impacts of alternative beef production systems depend on the functional unit used: Weight or monetary value.替代牛肉生产系统的气候影响取决于所使用的功能单位:重量或货币价值。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jul 30;121(31):e2321245121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2321245121. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
9
Sustainable animal agriculture in the United States and the implication in Republic of Korea.美国可持续畜牧业及其对韩国的影响
J Anim Sci Technol. 2024 Mar;66(2):279-294. doi: 10.5187/jast.2024.e19. Epub 2024 Mar 31.
10
National Beef Quality Audit-2022 Phase 1: face-to-face and digital interviews.2022年全国牛肉品质审计第一阶段:面对面访谈和数字访谈。
Transl Anim Sci. 2024 Mar 12;8:txae034. doi: 10.1093/tas/txae034. eCollection 2024.