• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮穿刺腰椎间盘切吸术治疗慢性根性疼痛的疗效

Effectiveness of nucleoplasty applied for chronic radicular pain.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Management Center, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkey.

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2011 Aug;17(8):CR461-466. doi: 10.12659/MSM.881908.

DOI:10.12659/MSM.881908
PMID:21804466
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3539605/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over the last several decades there has been a general trend toward reduction and minimalization in surgical treatment of chronic back pain, since open surgery brings complications in small and contained disc herniations instead of achieving expected success. Attention has been focussed on percutaneous nucleoplasty due to the limited success of other minimally invasive methods, as well due to their associated complications. However, there have been few studies in the English literature with a follow-up period of more than 1 year.

MATERIAL/METHODS: Patients with chronic disc herniations having more significant radicular leg pain, who did not respond to non-invasive treatment methods and for whom open surgery was not an option were selected for percutaneous nucleoplasty application. Upon intervention, patients were prospectively questioned by an independent physician regarding pain, physical improvement, and operation satisfaction at 1, 6, 12 and 24 months. Pain was evaluated with VAS, and physical improvement was evaluated based on the Oswestry Disability Index.

RESULTS

Mean VAS that was 8.7±1.1 before the procedure was determined to be 3.4±1.9 at 24 months follow-up. At the latest follow-up, 87.5% of the patients reported a 30% or higher decrease in their pain. While Oswestry scores were 76.1±10.2 in the beginning, they went down to 33.9±14.9 at the end of 2 years. The percent of those stating "good" and "excellent" satisfaction was 66% (23 persons) on the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

While it is once more shown that nucleoplasty is a safe method, it is also shown that its effectiveness continues at the end of 2 years.

摘要

背景

在过去几十年中,慢性腰痛的手术治疗总体上呈现出减少和最小化的趋势,因为开放性手术在小而局限的椎间盘突出症中会带来并发症,而不是取得预期的成功。由于其他微创方法的效果有限,以及它们相关的并发症,人们开始关注经皮髓核成形术。然而,在英文文献中,只有少数研究的随访时间超过 1 年。

材料/方法:选择患有慢性椎间盘突出症且神经根性腿痛较为严重的患者,这些患者对非侵入性治疗方法没有反应,且开放性手术不是选择,适合进行经皮髓核成形术。在干预时,一位独立的医生前瞻性地询问患者疼痛、身体改善和手术满意度,时间分别为 1、6、12 和 24 个月。疼痛通过 VAS 进行评估,身体改善根据 Oswestry 残疾指数进行评估。

结果

术前平均 VAS 为 8.7±1.1,24 个月随访时降至 3.4±1.9。在最近的随访中,87.5%的患者报告疼痛减轻了 30%或以上。Oswestry 评分在开始时为 76.1±10.2,2 年后降至 33.9±14.9。在最后一次随访时,有 66%(23 人)表示“良好”和“优秀”的满意度。

结论

虽然再次表明髓核成形术是一种安全的方法,但也表明其有效性在 2 年后仍在持续。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3191/3539605/9652677576da/medscimonit-17-8-CR460-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3191/3539605/24559616d159/medscimonit-17-8-CR460-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3191/3539605/9652677576da/medscimonit-17-8-CR460-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3191/3539605/24559616d159/medscimonit-17-8-CR460-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3191/3539605/9652677576da/medscimonit-17-8-CR460-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of nucleoplasty applied for chronic radicular pain.经皮穿刺腰椎间盘切吸术治疗慢性根性疼痛的疗效
Med Sci Monit. 2011 Aug;17(8):CR461-466. doi: 10.12659/MSM.881908.
2
Quality of life assessment in patients undergoing nucleoplasty-based percutaneous discectomy.接受基于髓核成形术的经皮椎间盘切除术患者的生活质量评估
J Neurosurg Spine. 2006 Jan;4(1):36-42. doi: 10.3171/spi.2006.4.1.36.
3
The results of nucleoplasty in patients with lumbar herniated disc: a prospective clinical study of 52 consecutive patients.腰椎间盘突出症患者行髓核成形术的结果:52例连续患者的前瞻性临床研究
Spine J. 2007 Jan-Feb;7(1):88-92; discussion 92-3. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.02.033. Epub 2006 Nov 20.
4
The Effect of Percutaneous Nucleoplasty vs Anterior Discectomy in Patients with Cervical Radicular Pain due to a Single-Level Contained Soft-Disc Herniation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.经皮髓核成形术与前路椎间盘切除术治疗单节段包容型软椎间盘突出症神经根性颈椎病的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
Pain Physician. 2020 Nov;23(6):553-564.
5
CAM versus nucleoplasty.经皮激光椎间盘减压术与髓核成形术的对比
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2005;92:111-4. doi: 10.1007/3-211-27458-8_24.
6
Nucleoplasty is effective in reducing both mechanical and radicular low back pain: a prospective study in 87 patients.经皮椎体成形术在减轻机械性和神经根性下腰痛方面均有效:一项针对87例患者的前瞻性研究。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012 Aug;25(6):329-32. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318220dbe9.
7
Percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty in the treatment of cervical disc herniation.经皮颈椎间盘成形术治疗颈椎间盘突出症。
Eur Spine J. 2008 Dec;17(12):1664-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0786-7. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
8
The efficacy of coblation nucleoplasty for protrusion of lumbar intervertebral disc at a two-year follow-up.低温射频消融髓核成形术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的 2 年疗效观察。
Int Orthop. 2011 Nov;35(11):1677-82. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1196-0. Epub 2011 Jan 15.
9
Efficacy of Nucleoplasty for Radiculopathy Caused by Foraminal Cervical Disc Herniation: Clinical Results of Case Series and Technical Note.经皮穿刺颈椎间盘成形术治疗侧方型颈椎间盘突出症神经根病的疗效:病例系列研究的临床结果和技术说明。
Pain Physician. 2022 Oct;25(7):E1087-E1094.
10
Comparison of percutaneous nucleoplasty and open discectomy in patients with lumbar disc protrusions.腰椎间盘突出症患者经皮髓核成形术与开放性椎间盘切除术的比较。
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2013 Jan-Feb;108(1):94-8.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Treatment Guidelines for Lumbar Disc Herniation.腰椎间盘突出症治疗指南的系统评价
Neurospine. 2025 Jun;22(2):389-402. doi: 10.14245/ns.2550398.199. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
2
Clinical efficacy of nucleoplasty for uncontained lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study.经皮穿刺腰椎间盘切吸术治疗包容性腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jan 2;25(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-07120-3.
3
Machine Learning Assisting the Prediction of Clinical Outcomes following Nucleoplasty for Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease.

本文引用的文献

1
Determination of pain intensity risk factors among school children with nonspecific low back pain.测定非特异性下腰痛学龄儿童疼痛强度的风险因素。
Med Sci Monit. 2011 Feb;17(2):PH12-5. doi: 10.12659/msm.881378.
2
Differential treatment of nerve root compression pain caused by lumbar disc herniation applying nucleoplasty.经皮腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症神经根压迫性疼痛的差异。
Pain Physician. 2010 Sep-Oct;13(5):469-80.
3
Rehabilitation following lumbosacral percutaneous nucleoplasty: a case report.腰骶经皮穿刺髓核成形术后康复:病例报告。
机器学习辅助预测腰椎间盘退变疾病髓核成形术后的临床结果
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 26;13(11):1863. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13111863.
4
Analysis of the clinical and radiological outcomes of percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty: A case-control study.经皮颈椎间盘髓核成形术的临床和影像学结果分析:一项病例对照研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 12;17(12):e0278883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278883. eCollection 2022.
5
A New Role for Epidurography: A Simple Method for Assessing the Adequacy of Decompression during Percutaneous Plasma Disc Decompression.硬膜外造影的新作用:一种评估经皮等离子椎间盘减压术中减压充分性的简单方法。
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 1;11(23):7144. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237144.
6
Comparison of the Characteristics of Back Pain in Women with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis with and without Vertebral Compression Fracture: A Retrospective Study at a Single Osteoporosis Center in Poland.比较波兰单一骨质疏松症中心绝经后骨质疏松症伴与不伴椎体压缩性骨折女性背痛特征的回顾性研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2021 Feb 18;27:e929853. doi: 10.12659/MSM.929853.
7
Percutaneous navigable intradiscal decompression in treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a single-center experience.经皮可导航椎间盘内减压术治疗腰椎间盘突出症:单中心经验。
Turk J Med Sci. 2019 Apr 18;49(2):519-524. doi: 10.3906/sag-1805-187.
8
The Factors Associated With the Successful Outcomes of Percutaneous Disc Decompression in Patients With Lumbar Herniated Nucleus Pulposus.腰椎间盘突出症患者经皮椎间盘减压成功预后的相关因素
Ann Rehabil Med. 2015 Oct;39(5):735-44. doi: 10.5535/arm.2015.39.5.735. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Apr;40(4):214-24. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3115.
4
Functional Rating Index: literature review.功能评定指数:文献综述。
Med Sci Monit. 2010 Feb;16(2):RA25-36.
5
Percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty and percutaneous cervical discectomy treatments of the contained cervical disc herniation.经皮颈椎间盘成形术和经皮颈椎间盘切除术治疗包含型颈椎间盘突出症。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010 Nov;130(11):1371-6. doi: 10.1007/s00402-009-1041-3. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
6
A systematic review of mechanical lumbar disc decompression with nucleoplasty.经皮髓核成形术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的系统评价
Pain Physician. 2009 May-Jun;12(3):561-72.
7
Nonsurgical interventional therapies for low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society clinical practice guideline.腰痛的非手术介入治疗:美国疼痛学会临床实践指南的证据综述
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 May 1;34(10):1078-93. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a103b1.
8
Percutaneous cervical disc decompression.经皮颈椎间盘减压术
Surg Radiol Anat. 2009 Jun;31(5):379-87. doi: 10.1007/s00276-009-0462-6. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
9
Timing of surgery for sciatica: subgroup analysis alongside a randomized trial.坐骨神经痛的手术时机:随机试验中的亚组分析
Eur Spine J. 2009 Apr;18(4):538-45. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0867-7. Epub 2009 Jan 9.
10
Minimally invasive spinal surgery using nucleoplasty: a 1-year follow-up study.使用髓核成形术的微创脊柱手术:一项为期1年的随访研究。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008 Dec;150(12):1257-62. doi: 10.1007/s00701-008-0150-z. Epub 2008 Nov 21.