Kaur Manpreet, Katyal Sunil, Kathuria Suneet, Singh Prabhjot
Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, J.P.N.A Trauma Centre, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Saudi J Anaesth. 2011 Apr;5(2):202-7. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.82804.
The objective of the present study was to compare the onset, degree and recovery time of sensory and motor block and hemodynamic effects of intrathecal bupivacaine alone and bupivacaine with sufentanil or butorphanol in endoscopic urological surgeries.
In a randomized, double-blind study, 90 patients of either sex and age, belonging to ASA Grades I and II, scheduled for elective endoscopic urological surgeries under spinal anesthesia, were allocated into three groups of 30 each. Patients received either 2.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric buypivacaine 12.5 mg (Group A), 1.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 7.5 mg with 10 μg sufentanil (Group B) or 1.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 7.5 mg with 25 μg butorphanol (Group C). Vital parameters, level, duration and regression of sensory block and motor block and side-effects were recorded and compared.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA), post hoc test and Chi-square test were used.
Intrathecal addition of sufentanil/butorphanol prolonged the duration of sensory block (DOSB) compared with bupivacaine alone (DOSB being 156.83±23.83 min, 170.87 ± 22.21 min and 171.17 ± 23.99 min in groups A, B and C, respectively) without altering the duration of motor blockade. Bromage score 3 was achieved in 100%, 90% and 54.4% patients in groups A, B and C, respectively. The time to first request for analgesia was 112 ± 46.3 min, 323 ± 65.0 min and 299 ± 73.9 min in groups A, B and C, respectively. Complications were reduced by the addition of butorphanol, which also has a lower tendency than sufentanil to produce pruritus (60%).
The analgesia was significantly prolonged in groups B and C; group C had a less-intense motor block. Complications were reduced by the addition of butorphanol, which also has a lower tendency than sufentanil to produce pruritus. Thus, this combination of butorphanol with low-dose bupivacaine is especially beneficial in the geriatric group of patients who have multiple co-morbid conditions.
本研究的目的是比较在泌尿外科内镜手术中,单纯鞘内注射布比卡因以及布比卡因与舒芬太尼或布托啡诺联合使用时,感觉和运动阻滞的起效时间、程度、恢复时间以及血流动力学效应。
在一项随机、双盲研究中,将90例年龄、性别不限,ASA分级为Ⅰ级和Ⅱ级,计划在脊麻下进行择期泌尿外科内镜手术的患者,随机分为三组,每组30例。患者分别接受2.5 ml 0.5%重比重布比卡因12.5 mg(A组)、1.5 ml 0.5%重比重布比卡因7.5 mg加10 μg舒芬太尼(B组)或1.5 ml 0.5%重比重布比卡因7.5 mg加25 μg布托啡诺(C组)。记录并比较生命体征参数、感觉阻滞和运动阻滞的平面、持续时间及消退情况以及副作用。
采用方差分析(ANOVA)、事后检验和卡方检验。
与单纯使用布比卡因相比,鞘内加入舒芬太尼/布托啡诺可延长感觉阻滞持续时间(A组、B组和C组的感觉阻滞持续时间分别为156.83±23.83分钟、170.87±22.21分钟和171.17±23.99分钟),但不改变运动阻滞持续时间。A组、B组和C组分别有100%、90%和54.4%的患者达到布罗麻醉评分3级。A组、B组和C组首次要求镇痛的时间分别为112±46.3分钟、323±65.0分钟和299±73.9分钟。加入布托啡诺可减少并发症,且布托啡诺产生瘙痒的倾向也低于舒芬太尼(60%)。
B组和C组的镇痛时间显著延长;C组的运动阻滞较轻。加入布托啡诺可减少并发症,且布托啡诺产生瘙痒的倾向也低于舒芬太尼。因此,布托啡诺与低剂量布比卡因的这种联合用药对患有多种合并症的老年患者尤其有益。