• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会(ACC/AHA)的冠状动脉病变分类反映了当前经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的医疗资源利用情况。

ACC/AHA classification of coronary lesions reflects medical resource use in current percutaneous coronary interventions.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Integrated Medicine I, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Omiya, Saitama, Japan.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Sep 1;80(3):370-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23270. Epub 2011 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.23270
PMID:21805596
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between ACC/AHA type classification of coronary lesions and medical resource utilization.

BACKGROUND

It is not known whether the classification of coronary lesions by the ACC/AHA system reflects the consumption of medical resources in current percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).

METHODS

We identified coronary artery lesions treated with PCI from our PCI database between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2009. Lesions were classified into type A, type B1, type B2, and type C according to the ACC/AHA definition. Total PCI cost, total contrast volume, and total fluoroscopy time were compared among the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 447 lesions were analyzed. The number of type A, type B1, type B2, and type C lesion were 75 (16.8%), 98 (21.9%), 145 (32.4%), and 129 (28.9%), respectively. Total PCI cost for type A, type B1, type B2, and type C lesions were $7,262 ± 1,397, $8,126 ± 1,891, $9,126 ± 3,128, and $13,243 ± 4,678, respectively (P < 0.0001). Total contrast volume and fluoroscopy time were also stratified according to the order of type A, type B1, type B2, and type C lesions (P < 0.0001 for total contrast volume; P < 0.0001 for total fluoroscopy time).

CONCLUSIONS

Total PCI cost, total contrast volume, and total fluoroscopy time were clearly stratified according to the order of type A, type B1, type B2, and type C lesions. Lesion classification by the ACC/AHA system reflects medical resource use in current PCI.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨冠状动脉病变的 ACC/AHA 分型与医疗资源利用之间的关系。

背景

目前尚不清楚 ACC/AHA 系统对冠状动脉病变的分类是否反映了当前经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中医疗资源的消耗。

方法

我们从 2009 年 1 月 1 日至 2009 年 12 月 31 日的 PCI 数据库中确定了接受 PCI 治疗的冠状动脉病变。根据 ACC/AHA 定义,病变分为 A 型、B1 型、B2 型和 C 型。比较各组之间的总 PCI 费用、总造影剂用量和总透视时间。

结果

共分析了 447 个病变。A 型、B1 型、B2 型和 C 型病变的数量分别为 75(16.8%)、98(21.9%)、145(32.4%)和 129(28.9%)。A 型、B1 型、B2 型和 C 型病变的总 PCI 费用分别为 7262±1397 美元、8126±1891 美元、9126±3128 美元和 13243±4678 美元(P<0.0001)。总造影剂用量和透视时间也根据 A 型、B1 型、B2 型和 C 型病变的顺序进行分层(总造影剂用量 P<0.0001;总透视时间 P<0.0001)。

结论

总 PCI 费用、总造影剂用量和总透视时间均根据 A 型、B1 型、B2 型和 C 型病变的顺序明显分层。ACC/AHA 系统的病变分类反映了当前 PCI 中的医疗资源利用情况。

相似文献

1
ACC/AHA classification of coronary lesions reflects medical resource use in current percutaneous coronary interventions.美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会(ACC/AHA)的冠状动脉病变分类反映了当前经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的医疗资源利用情况。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Sep 1;80(3):370-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23270. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
2
Comparison of the resource utilization between simultaneous strategy and staged strategy to treat two-vessel coronary artery disease by percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗双支冠状动脉疾病时同期策略与分期策略资源利用情况的比较。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2011 Nov;23(11):454-9.
3
Utility of the ACC/AHA lesion classification as a predictor of procedural, 30-day and 12-month outcomes in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention era.ACC/AHA 病变分类在当代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时代对手术、30 天和 12 个月结局的预测价值。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep 1;92(3):E227-E234. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27411. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
4
Comparison of Mayo Clinic risk score and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association lesion classification in the prediction of adverse cardiovascular outcome following percutaneous coronary interventions.梅奥诊所风险评分与美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会病变分类在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后不良心血管结局预测中的比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Jul 21;44(2):357-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.059.
5
An evaluation of fluoroscopy time and correlation with outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后透视时间评估及其与预后的相关性
J Invasive Cardiol. 2007 May;19(5):208-13.
6
Characterization of complex coronary artery stenosis morphology by coronary computed tomographic angiography.通过冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影术对复杂冠状动脉狭窄形态进行特征描述。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Aug;2(8):950-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.12.032.
7
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the DELTA Registry (drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease): a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗开口/中段病变与无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期临床结局:DELTA 注册研究(左主干冠状动脉疾病药物洗脱支架):一项多中心注册研究,评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干的疗效。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.005.
8
Determinants of high device cost in current percutaneous coronary interventions.当前经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中器械成本高昂的决定因素。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Jul-Aug;19(5 Pt B):607-612. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.12.007. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
9
The predictors of successful percutaneous coronary intervention in ostial left anterior descending artery chronic total occlusion.左前降支开口处慢性完全闭塞病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗成功的预测因素
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Oct 1;84(4):E30-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25514. Epub 2014 May 13.
10
Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in intermediate coronary artery disease: fractional flow reserve-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在中间型冠状动脉疾病中的疗效:血流储备分数指导与血管内超声指导。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Aug;3(8):812-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.04.016.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the effect of hypertension on the severity of coronary artery lesions in young female with acute coronary syndrome.评估高血压对年轻急性冠状动脉综合征女性患者冠状动脉病变严重程度的影响。
BMC Womens Health. 2025 Apr 12;25(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03721-3.
2
Agreement and reproducibility between 3DStent vs. Optical Coherence Tomography for evaluation of stent area and diameter.3D 支架与光学相干断层扫描在评估支架面积和直径方面的一致性及可重复性。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Dec;40(12):2581-2589. doi: 10.1007/s10554-024-03268-8. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
3
Evaluation of preprocedural statin loading on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention.
择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者术前他汀类药物负荷对临床结局的评估。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Aug 20;11:1435989. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1435989. eCollection 2024.
4
Robotic percutaneous coronary intervention (R-PCI): Time to focus on the pros and cons.机器人经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(R-PCI):是时候关注利弊了。
Indian Heart J. 2023 May-Jun;75(3):161-168. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2023.04.002. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
5
Association of the long fluoroscopy time with factors in contemporary primary percutaneous coronary interventions.长透视时间与当代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中因素的相关性。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 10;15(8):e0237362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237362. eCollection 2020.
6
Utilization of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction and High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.经皮机械循环支持装置在急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克及高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用
J Clin Med. 2019 Aug 13;8(8):1209. doi: 10.3390/jcm8081209.
7
Association of less-contrast media with clinical factors in elective percutaneous coronary intervention.选择性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中造影剂用量减少与临床因素的关联
Heart Vessels. 2020 Feb;35(2):143-152. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01473-3. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
8
Transient no reflow following primary percutaneous coronary intervention.直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的短暂无复流现象。
Heart Vessels. 2014 Jul;29(4):429-36. doi: 10.1007/s00380-013-0379-1. Epub 2013 Jun 27.