• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2006-2010 年澳大利亚单药治疗与氨氯地平阿托伐他汀二联治疗的持久性比较。

Persistence with a single pill versus two pills of amlodipine and atorvastatin: the Australian experience, 2006-2010.

机构信息

St Vincent's Hospital, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2011 Aug 1;195(3):134-7. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb03240.x.

DOI:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb03240.x
PMID:21806531
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study patient persistence on therapy for hypertension and dyslipidaemia using a single-pill combination compared with a two-pill approach.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Post-hoc observational assessment of Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme claim records covering the period April 2005 to March 2010.

PARTICIPANTS

A 10% random sample of Australian long-term concession card holders was analysed. The patients studied had commenced on either amlodipine and atorvastatin as two individual pills, or a single pill containing both amlodipine and atorvastatin (AA), with neither combined approach having been dispensed to them in the previous 6 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The proportions of patients failing to fill their first repeat prescription after 1 month or failing to persist with treatment at 12 months, and the median persistence time (MPT) were measured.

RESULTS

Of 4146 patients prescribed the AA single pill, 11% failed to fill the first repeat prescription and 33% had ceased treatment by 12 months (MPT, 35 months). Of 6204 patients prescribed amlodipine and atorvastatin as two pills, 23% failed to fill the first repeat prescriptions and 59% had ceased treatment by 12 months (MPT, 7 months). In a multivariate model, cessation of single-pill therapy increased by 165% if there was no prior therapy, but only increased by 48%-55% if there was no prior therapy with a calcium channel blocker or statin. MPT on the single pill was 8 months in those without prior antihypertensive therapy, but was ≥ 37 months in those with any prior antihypertensive therapy.

CONCLUSION

A single-pill combination drug is associated with superior long-term persistence compared with two-pill therapy in the management of hypertension and dyslipidaemia.

摘要

目的

研究与两药方案相比,使用单片复方制剂治疗高血压和血脂异常的患者持续用药情况。

设计和设置

对 2005 年 4 月至 2010 年 3 月期间药品福利计划索赔记录的事后观察性评估。

参与者

分析了澳大利亚长期优惠卡持有者的 10%随机样本。研究对象开始服用氨氯地平和阿托伐他汀两种单独的药丸,或者服用含有氨氯地平和阿托伐他汀的单片复方制剂(AA),在过去 6 个月内都没有同时开这两种药物。

主要观察指标

测量患者在 1 个月时未能首次续方的比例、在 12 个月时停药的比例,以及中位持续时间(MPT)。

结果

在接受 AA 单药治疗的 4146 例患者中,有 11%的患者未能首次续方,33%的患者在 12 个月时停止治疗(MPT 为 35 个月)。在接受氨氯地平和阿托伐他汀两种药物治疗的 6204 例患者中,有 23%的患者未能首次续方,59%的患者在 12 个月时停止治疗(MPT 为 7 个月)。在多变量模型中,如果没有既往治疗,单一药物治疗的停药风险增加 165%,但如果没有钙通道阻滞剂或他汀类药物的既往治疗,停药风险仅增加 48%-55%。如果没有既往抗高血压治疗,单片药物的 MPT 为 8 个月,但如果有任何既往抗高血压治疗,MPT 则≥37 个月。

结论

与两药方案相比,在高血压和血脂异常的治疗中,单片复方制剂药物具有更高的长期持续治疗率。

相似文献

1
Persistence with a single pill versus two pills of amlodipine and atorvastatin: the Australian experience, 2006-2010.2006-2010 年澳大利亚单药治疗与氨氯地平阿托伐他汀二联治疗的持久性比较。
Med J Aust. 2011 Aug 1;195(3):134-7. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb03240.x.
2
Does a single-pill antihypertensive/lipid-lowering regimen improve adherence in US managed care enrolees? A non-randomized, observational, retrospective study.单一片剂降压/降脂方案是否能提高美国管理式医疗参保者的依从性?一项非随机、观察性、回顾性研究。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2010;10(3):193-202. doi: 10.2165/11530680-000000000-00000.
3
Long-term persistence with single-pill, fixed-dose combination therapy versus two pills of amlodipine and perindopril for hypertension: Australian experience.单一片剂固定剂量联合疗法与氨氯地平及培哚普利两片剂治疗高血压的长期持续性:澳大利亚经验
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Oct;33(10):1783-1787. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1367275. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
4
Effects of Switching from Treatment with Amlodipine and Atorvastatin Using Two Pills to an Equal Dose of Single-Pill Therapy in Japanese Outpatients.日本门诊患者中,将氨氯地平和阿托伐他汀的两种药物治疗转换为同等剂量的单片治疗的效果。
Acta Med Okayama. 2020 Apr;74(2):103-108. doi: 10.18926/AMO/58267.
5
Amlodipine + atorvastatin single pill is the most effective choice for primary prevention.氨氯地平+阿托伐他汀单片制剂是一级预防的最有效选择。
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2010 Jul-Aug;21(4):243.
6
Who benefits from fixed-dose combinations? Two-year statin adherence trajectories in initiators of combined amlodipine/atorvastatin therapy.谁从固定剂量复方制剂中获益?联合应用氨氯地平/阿托伐他汀治疗起始者的他汀类药物 2 年依从性轨迹。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Dec;26(12):1465-1473. doi: 10.1002/pds.4342. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
7
International open-label studies to assess the efficacy and safety of single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin in attaining blood pressure and lipid targets recommended by country-specific guidelines: the JEWEL programme.国际开放标签研究,以评估单片氨氯地平/阿托伐他汀在实现各国特定指南所推荐的血压和血脂目标方面的疗效和安全性:JEWEL计划。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009 Aug;16(4):472-80. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e32832b63f5.
8
Adherence with single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin vs a two-pill regimen.单粒氨氯地平/阿托伐他汀与两粒药方案的依从性。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008;4(3):673-81.
9
Simultaneous treatment of hypertension and dyslipidaemia may help to reduce overall cardiovascular risk: focus on amlodipine/atorvastatin single-pill therapy.同时治疗高血压和血脂异常可能有助于降低整体心血管风险:聚焦氨氯地平/阿托伐他汀单片复方制剂治疗
Int J Clin Pract. 2005 Jul;59(7):839-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2005.00601.x.
10
Improved attainment of blood pressure and cholesterol goals using single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin in African Americans: the CAPABLE trial.在非裔美国人中使用氨氯地平/阿托伐他汀单片制剂改善血压和胆固醇目标的实现情况:CAPABLE试验
Mayo Clin Proc. 2008 Jan;83(1):35-45. doi: 10.4065/83.1.35.

引用本文的文献

1
A real-world analysis of adherence, biochemical outcomes, and healthcare costs in patients treated with rosuvastatin/ezetimibe as single-pill combination vs. free combination in Italy.在意大利,瑞舒伐他汀/依折麦布单一片剂组合与自由组合治疗患者的依从性、生化指标结果及医疗成本的真实世界分析。
Eur Heart J Open. 2024 Aug 28;4(5):oeae074. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae074. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Effectiveness of Single-Tablet Combination Therapy in Improving Adherence and Persistence and the Relation to Clinical and Economic Outcomes.单片复方疗法在提高依从性和持续性方面的有效性及其与临床和经济结果的关系。
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2024 Jan 23;11(1):8-22. doi: 10.36469/001c.91396. eCollection 2024.
3
Vedolizumab has longer persistence than infliximab as a first-line biological agent but not as a second-line biological agent in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: real-world registry data from the Persistence Australian National IBD Cohort (PANIC) study.
在中重度溃疡性结肠炎中,作为一线生物制剂时,维多珠单抗的持久性比英夫利昔单抗更长,但作为二线生物制剂时则不然:来自澳大利亚全国炎症性肠病队列持久性(PANIC)研究的真实世界注册数据。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2022 Mar 8;15:17562848221080793. doi: 10.1177/17562848221080793. eCollection 2022.
4
Effects of Single Pill Combinations Compared to Identical Multi Pill Therapy on Outcomes in Hypertension, Dyslipidemia and Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention: The START-Study.与相同的多片疗法相比,单片复方制剂对高血压、血脂异常及二级心血管预防结局的影响:START研究
Integr Blood Press Control. 2022 Feb 27;15:11-21. doi: 10.2147/IBPC.S336324. eCollection 2022.
5
The changing face of Australian data reforms: impact on pharmacoepidemiology research.澳大利亚数据改革的面貌变化:对药物流行病学研究的影响。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2021 Apr 15;6(1):1418. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v6i1.1418.
6
Single Pill Regimen Leads to Better Adherence and Clinical Outcome in Daily Practice in Patients Suffering from Hypertension and/or Dyslipidemia: Results of a Meta-Analysis.单片复方制剂在高血压和/或血脂异常患者的日常实践中可带来更好的依从性和临床结局:一项荟萃分析的结果
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2020 Apr;27(2):157-164. doi: 10.1007/s40292-020-00370-5. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
7
Prior experience with cardiovascular medicines predicted longer persistence in people initiated to combinations of antihypertensive and lipid-lowering therapies: findings from two Australian cohorts.心血管药物的既往使用经验预示着开始接受抗高血压和降脂联合治疗的患者用药持续时间更长:来自两个澳大利亚队列的研究结果。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 May 16;12:835-843. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S150142. eCollection 2018.
8
Formulations of Amlodipine: A Review.氨氯地平制剂:综述
J Pharm (Cairo). 2016;2016:8961621. doi: 10.1155/2016/8961621. Epub 2016 Oct 16.
9
Does tablet formulation alone improve adherence and persistence: a comparison of ezetimibe fixed dose combination versus ezetimibe separate pill combination?仅片剂剂型就能提高依从性和持续性吗:依折麦布固定剂量复方制剂与依折麦布分开片剂联合用药的比较?
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jan;83(1):202-210. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13088. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
10
How does prescribing for antihypertensive products stack up against guideline recommendations? An Australian population-based study (2006-2014).抗高血压产品的处方与指南建议相比情况如何?一项基于澳大利亚人群的研究(2006 - 2014年)。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Oct;82(4):1134-45. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13043. Epub 2016 Jul 28.