Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Biochemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, National University of Rosario, National Centre of Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET), Rosario, Argentina.
Talanta. 2011 Sep 15;85(3):1526-34. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2011.06.043. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
A second-order multivariate calibration method based on a combination of unfolded partial least-squares (U-PLS) with residual bilinearization (RBL) has been applied to second-order data obtained from excitation-emission fluorescence matrices for determining atenolol in human urine, even in the presence of background interactions and fluorescence inner filter effects, which are both sample dependent. Atenolol is a cardioselective beta-blocker, which is considered a doping agent in shoot practice, so that its determination in urine can be required for monitoring the drug. Loss of trilinearity due to analyte-background interactions which may vary between samples, as well as inner filter effects, precludes the use of methods like parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) that cannot handle trilinearity deviations, and justifies the employment of U-PLS. Successful analysis required to include the background in the calibration set. Unexpected components appear in new urine samples, different from those used in calibration set, requiring the second-order advantage which is obtained from a separate procedure known as residual bilinearization (RBL). Satisfactory results were obtained for artificially spiked urines, and also for real urine samples. They were statistically compared with those obtained applying a reference method based on high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
基于无折叠部分最小二乘法 (U-PLS) 与残差双线性化 (RBL) 相结合的二阶多元校准方法已应用于从激发-发射荧光矩阵获得的二阶数据中,以确定人尿中的阿替洛尔,即使存在背景相互作用和荧光内滤效应,这两者都是依赖于样本的。阿替洛尔是一种心脏选择性β受体阻滞剂,被认为是射击运动中的兴奋剂,因此需要对其在尿液中的含量进行监测。由于分析物-背景相互作用而导致的三线性损失可能在样品之间有所不同,以及内滤效应,排除了无法处理三线性偏差的平行因子分析 (PARAFAC) 等方法的使用,并证明了 U-PLS 的使用是合理的。成功的分析需要将背景包括在校准集中。在新的尿液样本中出现了意想不到的成分,与校准集中使用的成分不同,需要从称为残差双线性化 (RBL) 的单独过程中获得二阶优势。对于人工加标的尿液和真实的尿液样本,均获得了令人满意的结果。将它们与基于高效液相色谱 (HPLC) 的参考方法获得的结果进行了统计学比较。