• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

互联网上带状疱疹后神经痛治疗信息质量的评估。

Assessment of the quality of postherpetic neuralgia treatment information on the Internet.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05401, USA.

出版信息

J Pain. 2011 Nov;12(11):1149-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.05.005. Epub 2011 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2011.05.005
PMID:21807567
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The objective of this study was to assess the quality of websites presenting treatment information for postherpetic neuralgia. The term "postherpetic neuralgia treatment" was searched using the Google and Yahoo search engines. Fifty websites from each were evaluated using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmarks, the Health on the Net (HON) seal, and the DISCERN instrument. The treatments suggested on each website were compared with 3 recognized first-line treatment options (antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and topical lidocaine). Less than half of the included websites fulfilled all JAMA benchmark requirements. Less than one-third of the websites displayed the HON seal. The DISCERN instrument evaluation revealed that most websites were of moderate quality. Commercial websites tended to be inferior in comparison to noncommercial websites. Most websites recommended at least 2 of the 3 recommended treatments as well as several second- and third-line treatments. One-third to one-half of websites recommended a nonbeneficial treatment. In conclusion, many different postherpetic neuralgia treatments are found on the Internet and patients may be left separating recommended treatments from nonrecommended treatments without help from their healthcare providers.

PERSPECTIVE

This study examined the quality of websites related to postherpetic neuralgia treatment. The results demonstrated that most websites offering advice on postherpetic neuralgia treatment are of only moderate quality and often offer treatment suggestions that are nonbeneficial. Patients and providers must use caution when taking advice from these sites.

摘要

未加标签

本研究旨在评估提供带状疱疹后神经痛治疗信息的网站质量。使用 Google 和 Yahoo 搜索引擎搜索“带状疱疹后神经痛治疗”一词。使用美国医学会(JAMA)基准、健康网络(HON)印章和 DISCERN 工具评估每个搜索引擎的前 50 个网站。比较每个网站建议的治疗方法与 3 种公认的一线治疗选择(抗抑郁药、抗惊厥药和局部利多卡因)。纳入的网站中不到一半符合所有 JAMA 基准要求。不到三分之一的网站显示 HON 印章。DISCERN 仪器评估显示,大多数网站的质量为中等。与非商业网站相比,商业网站往往较差。大多数网站推荐至少 3 种推荐治疗方法以及几种二线和三线治疗方法。三分之一到一半的网站推荐了非有益的治疗方法。结论:互联网上有许多不同的带状疱疹后神经痛治疗方法,患者可能在没有医疗服务提供者帮助的情况下,自行从推荐的治疗方法中甄别出非推荐的治疗方法。

观点

本研究检查了与带状疱疹后神经痛治疗相关的网站质量。结果表明,提供带状疱疹后神经痛治疗建议的大多数网站质量仅为中等,并且经常提供非有益的治疗建议。患者和提供者在从这些网站获取建议时必须谨慎。

相似文献

1
Assessment of the quality of postherpetic neuralgia treatment information on the Internet.互联网上带状疱疹后神经痛治疗信息质量的评估。
J Pain. 2011 Nov;12(11):1149-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.05.005. Epub 2011 Jul 31.
2
The quality of internet sites providing information relating to oral cancer.互联网口腔癌相关信息网站的质量。
Oral Oncol. 2009 Sep;45(9):e95-8. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.03.017. Epub 2009 May 19.
3
Head and neck cancer information on the internet: type, accuracy and content.互联网上的头颈部癌症信息:类型、准确性和内容。
Oral Oncol. 2009 Aug;45(8):675-7. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.10.006. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
4
Assessment of the quality of Internet information on sleeve gastrectomy.袖状胃切除术互联网信息质量评估
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 May-Jun;11(3):539-44. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
5
Quality and content of internet-based information on temporomandibular disorders.关于颞下颌关节紊乱症的网络信息的质量和内容。
J Orofac Pain. 2012 Fall;26(4):296-306.
6
[Quality of health information about epilepsy on the Internet: Evaluation of French websites].[互联网上有关癫痫的健康信息质量:法国网站评估]
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2013 Mar;169(3):234-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2012.08.008. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
7
Dissemination of 'patient-oriented evidence that matters' on the Internet: the case of Type 2 diabetes treatment.在互联网上传播“以患者为导向的重要证据”:2型糖尿病治疗的案例
Diabet Med. 2005 Jun;22(6):688-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01522.x.
8
The quality of internet information relating to oral leukoplakia.互联网口腔白斑相关信息的质量。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010 Sep 1;15(5):e727-31. doi: 10.4317/medoral.15.e727.
9
Are internet sites providing evidence-based information for patients suffering with Trigeminal Neuralgia?互联网网站是否为三叉神经痛患者提供基于证据的信息?
Scott Med J. 2014 May;59(2):114-7. doi: 10.1177/0036933014529243. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
10
Partial nephrectomy online: a preliminary evaluation of the quality of health information on the Internet.部分肾切除术在线:互联网健康信息质量的初步评估。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E765-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11626.x. Epub 2012 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Dietary and herbal supplements for weight loss: assessing the quality of patient information online.饮食和草药补充剂减肥:评估在线患者信息质量。
Nutr J. 2021 Jul 27;20(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12937-021-00729-x.
2
Dietary and herbal supplements for fatigue: A quality assessment of online consumer health information.用于缓解疲劳的膳食补充剂和草药补充剂:在线消费者健康信息的质量评估
Integr Med Res. 2021 Dec;10(4):100749. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2021.100749. Epub 2021 May 26.
3
Quality evaluation of Persian nutrition and diet therapy websites.
波斯语营养与饮食治疗网站的质量评估
J Educ Health Promot. 2017 Jun 5;6:48. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_83_14. eCollection 2017.
4
The quality of health information on allergic rhinitis, rhinitis, and sinusitis available on the internet.互联网上关于变应性鼻炎、鼻炎和鼻窦炎的健康信息质量。
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2015 Mar;7(2):141-7. doi: 10.4168/aair.2015.7.2.141. Epub 2014 Nov 5.