Faust Andrew C, Attridge Rebecca L, Ryan Laurajo
Methodist University Hospital, Dept of Pharmacy, Memphis, TN 38104, USA.
Crit Care Nurse. 2011 Aug;31(4):e9-e18. doi: 10.4037/ccn2011188.
Hyperglycemia, a common finding in critically ill patients, is linked to poor outcomes in multiple conditions. The Leuven I study published in 2001 was the first evaluation of intensive insulin therapy, and the 3.4% absolute reduction in mortality in a single-center surgical intensive care unit led to widespread endorsement of the therapy. In a subsequent study in a medical intensive care unit, reduction in mortality was not significant. Two multicenter studies were stopped early because of significantly higher rates of hypoglycemia in the patients receiving intensive insulin therapy. The episodes of hypoglycemia were linked to increased mortality. In the largest prospective study conducted to date, mortality was significantly higher (P = .02) in patients who had intensive therapy (27.5%) than in control patients (24.9%). Thus, after years of research, intensive insulin therapy does not appear to convey the original benefit in all critically ill patients. Several organizations have proposed alternative blood glucose targets, such as 140 to 180 mg/dL, to both provide glycemic control and reduce the opportunity for hypoglycemic episodes.
高血糖是危重症患者的常见表现,与多种疾病的不良预后相关。2001年发表的鲁汶I研究是对强化胰岛素治疗的首次评估,单中心外科重症监护病房死亡率绝对降低3.4%,使得该治疗方法得到广泛认可。在随后一项针对内科重症监护病房的研究中,死亡率降低并不显著。两项多中心研究因接受强化胰岛素治疗的患者低血糖发生率显著更高而提前终止。低血糖发作与死亡率增加有关。在迄今为止开展的最大规模前瞻性研究中,接受强化治疗的患者死亡率(27.5%)显著高于对照患者(24.9%)(P = 0.02)。因此,经过多年研究,强化胰岛素治疗似乎并未给所有危重症患者带来最初预期的益处。几个组织提出了替代血糖目标,如140至180mg/dL,以在控制血糖的同时减少低血糖发作的机会。