School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley, 120 Haviland Hall (MC 7400), Berkeley, CA 94720-7400, USA.
Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Aug;62(8):915-21. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.8.pss6208_0915.
Hierarchically organized board-and-staff-run consumer-operated service programs (COSPs) are viewed as organizations that promote recovery while working in concert with community mental health agencies (CMHAs). This study's objective was to determine the effectiveness of such combined services for people with serious mental illness.
A board-and-staff-run consumer-operated drop-in center and colocated CMHA provided the context for the randomized clinical trial. In a weighted sample, 139 new clients seeking help from the CMHA were randomly assigned to agency-only service or to a combination of COSP and CMHA services. Client-members were assessed at baseline and eight months on a measure of symptom severity and on four recovery-focused outcome measures: personal empowerment, self-efficacy, independent social integration, and hopelessness. All scales used have high reliability and well-established validity. Differences in outcome by service condition were evaluated with multivariate analysis of covariance via dummy variable regression. Change scores on the five outcomes were the dependent variables. The covariates for the multivariate analysis included baseline status on each outcome measure and service condition between-group demographic differences.
Results indicated that significant changes in three recovery-focused outcomes were associated with service condition across time: social integration (p<.001), personal empowerment (p<.006), and self-efficacy (p<.001). All changes favored the CMHA-only condition. Neither symptomology nor hopelessness differed by service condition across time.
Hierarchically organized board-and-staff-run COSPs combined with CMHA service may be less helpful than CMHA service alone.
层级式董事会和员工管理的消费者运营服务项目(COSP)被视为在与社区心理健康机构(CMHA)协同工作的同时促进康复的组织。本研究的目的是确定这种联合服务对严重精神疾病患者的有效性。
一个由董事会和员工管理的消费者运营的临时收容中心和相邻的 CMHA 为这项随机临床试验提供了背景。在加权样本中,139 名新寻求 CMHA 帮助的客户被随机分配到仅机构服务或 COSP 和 CMHA 服务的组合。在基线和八个月时,客户成员根据症状严重程度和四项以康复为重点的结果测量进行评估:个人授权、自我效能、独立的社会融合和绝望感。所有使用的量表都具有高度可靠性和良好的有效性。通过使用哑变量回归的协方差多元分析评估服务条件对结果的差异。五个结果的变化分数是因变量。多变量分析的协变量包括每个结果测量的基线状态和服务条件之间的组间人口统计学差异。
结果表明,三个以康复为重点的结果在服务条件上的变化与时间有关:社会融合(p<.001)、个人授权(p<.006)和自我效能(p<.001)。所有变化都有利于 CMHA 仅服务条件。症状学和绝望感在服务条件上在时间上没有差异。
层级式董事会和员工管理的 COSP 与 CMHA 服务相结合可能不如 CMHA 服务单独提供帮助。