• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“种子怎么了?”社区心理健康中以社区为中心的赋权康复方法的比较研究

"What's Wrong with the Seed?" A Comparative Examination of an Empowering Community-Centered Approach to Recovery in Community Mental Health.

作者信息

Jorge-Monteiro Maria F, Ornelas José H

机构信息

ISPA - Instituto Universitário, Rua Jardim do Tabaco, No. 34, 1149-041, Lisbon, Portugal.

Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, ISPA - Instituto Universitário, Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

Community Ment Health J. 2016 Oct;52(7):821-33. doi: 10.1007/s10597-016-0004-8. Epub 2016 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1007/s10597-016-0004-8
PMID:27072950
Abstract

This cross-sectional group comparison aimed to examine whether personal empowerment, recovery and community integration were associated with the individual's participation in an empowering community-centered model of intervention. Ninety-three participants from an empowering community-centered community mental health organization were compared with a matched group of individuals from standard interventions of four equivalent organizations. Results showed that participants taking advantage of the empowering community-centered approach were more involved in high recovery-oriented programs; and attained higher levels of personal goals and hope, empowerment, and of community integration. An involvement in high recovery-oriented programs (supported employment or independent housing) revealed improved outcomes for the individual. In conclusion, the findings suggested a transformative impact of the empowering community-centered model both at the individual and the program level by altering the resource accessibility and social conditions for people who experience mental illness. The implications of findings for transforming community mental health practice are discussed in detail.

摘要

这项横断面组间比较旨在研究个人赋权、康复及社区融入是否与个体参与以社区为中心的赋权干预模式有关。来自一个以社区为中心的赋权社区心理健康组织的93名参与者与来自四个同等组织的标准干预措施的匹配个体组进行了比较。结果表明,采用以社区为中心的赋权方法的参与者更多地参与了以康复为导向的高目标项目;并实现了更高水平的个人目标和希望、赋权及社区融入。参与以康复为导向的高目标项目(支持性就业或独立住房)对个体而言显示出更好的结果。总之,研究结果表明,以社区为中心的赋权模式通过改变精神疾病患者的资源可及性和社会条件,在个体和项目层面都产生了变革性影响。文中详细讨论了研究结果对转变社区心理健康实践的意义。

相似文献

1
"What's Wrong with the Seed?" A Comparative Examination of an Empowering Community-Centered Approach to Recovery in Community Mental Health.“种子怎么了?”社区心理健康中以社区为中心的赋权康复方法的比较研究
Community Ment Health J. 2016 Oct;52(7):821-33. doi: 10.1007/s10597-016-0004-8. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
2
The Station Community Mental Health Centre Inc: nurturing and empowering.车站社区心理健康中心有限公司:关怀与赋能。
Rural Remote Health. 2010 Jul-Sep;10(3):1411. Epub 2010 Aug 9.
3
Integrating personal medicine into service delivery: empowering people in recovery.将个人医学融入服务提供:赋予康复中的人们权力。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2013 Dec;36(4):258-63. doi: 10.1037/prj0000027.
4
The relationship between community integration and mental health recovery in people with mental health issues living in the community: A quantitative study.社区融合与社区精神健康问题患者心理健康恢复之间的关系:一项定量研究。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Jun;27(3):296-307. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12578. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
5
Community integration of transition-age individuals: views of young with mental health disorders.过渡年龄个体的社区融入:患有精神疾病的年轻人的观点
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2008 Oct;35(4):402-18. doi: 10.1007/s11414-007-9062-6. Epub 2007 Apr 27.
6
Community participation as a predictor of recovery-oriented outcomes among emerging and mature adults with mental illnesses.社区参与是预测精神疾病成年患者康复结果的一个因素。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2012 Winter;35(3):219-29. doi: 10.2975/35.3.2012.219.229.
7
[Two "hybrid" vocational services for people with a severe mental illness in France and Quebec].[法国和魁北克为重度精神疾病患者提供的两种“混合型”职业服务]
Encephale. 2014 Jun;40 Suppl 2:S66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
8
Psychiatric rehabilitation: an empowerment-based approach to mental health services.精神康复:一种基于赋权的心理健康服务方法。
Health Soc Work. 2003 Aug;28(3):206-13. doi: 10.1093/hsw/28.3.206.
9
Sensory processing, participation, and recovery in adults with serious mental illnesses.患有严重精神疾病的成年人的感觉处理、参与和康复。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2014 Dec;37(4):289-96. doi: 10.1037/prj0000099.
10
An empirical evaluation of recovery transformation at a large community psychiatric rehabilitation organization.大型社区精神康复机构康复转型的实证评估。
Psychol Serv. 2013 Nov;10(4):428-41. doi: 10.1037/a0032747. Epub 2013 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Community psychiatry in Portugal: a critical review.葡萄牙的社区精神病学:批判性综述。
Consort Psychiatr. 2020 Sep 2;1(1):49-59. doi: 10.17650/2712-7672-2020-1-1-49-59.
2
Mental health services implementation in Colombia-A systematic review.哥伦比亚心理健康服务的实施——一项系统综述
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Dec 6;3(12):e0001565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001565. eCollection 2023.
3
The Achieved Capabilities Questionnaire for Community Mental Health (ACQ-CMH): A consumer-based measure for the evaluation of community mental health interventions.

本文引用的文献

1
Recovery Assessment Scale: Testing validity with Portuguese community-based mental health organization users.康复评估量表:对葡萄牙社区心理健康组织的使用者进行效度测试。
Psychol Assess. 2016 Mar;28(3):e1-11. doi: 10.1037/pas0000176. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
2
Properties of the Portuguese version of the empowerment scale with mental health organization users.葡萄牙语版心理健康组织用户赋权量表的特性
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2014 Nov 25;8:48. doi: 10.1186/1752-4458-8-48. eCollection 2014.
3
Citizenship and recovery: two intertwined concepts for civic-recovery.
社区心理健康成就能力问卷(ACQ-CMH):一种基于消费者的社区心理健康干预措施评估工具。
Am J Community Psychol. 2022 Dec;70(3-4):327-339. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12599. Epub 2022 May 2.
4
The social income inequality, social integration and health status of internal migrants in China.中国国内移民的社会收入不平等、社会融合和健康状况。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Aug 4;16(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0640-9.
公民身份与恢复:公民恢复的两个相互交织的概念。
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Mar 4;15:37. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0420-2.
4
Predictors of valued everyday occupations, empowerment and satisfaction in day centres: implications for services for persons with psychiatric disabilities.日间护理中心有价值的日常活动、赋权及满意度的预测因素:对精神残疾者服务的启示
Scand J Caring Sci. 2014 Sep;28(3):582-90. doi: 10.1111/scs.12085. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
5
Measurement equivalence of the Empowerment Scale for White and Black persons with severe mental illness.重度精神疾病白人和黑人赋权量表的测量等效性。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2014 Dec;37(4):277-283. doi: 10.1037/prj0000069. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
6
Strategies for integrated employment and mental health services.综合就业与心理健康服务策略。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2014 Jun;37(2):86-9. doi: 10.1037/prj0000049. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
7
Permanent supportive housing: assessing the evidence.永久性支持性住房:评估证据
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Mar 1;65(3):287-94. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300261.
8
A little goes a long way: the impact of distal social support on community integration and recovery of individuals with psychiatric disabilities.千里送鹅毛:远端社会支持对精神残疾个体的社区融入和康复的影响。
Am J Community Psychol. 2013 Sep;52(1-2):84-96. doi: 10.1007/s10464-013-9578-2.
9
Comparing neighborhoods of adults with serious mental illness and of the general population: research implications.比较患有严重精神疾病的成年人和一般人群的社区:研究意义。
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Aug 1;64(8):782-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200365.
10
SOCIAL ROLE VALORIZATION IN COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH HOUSING: DOES IT CONTRIBUTE TO THE COMMUNITY INTEGRATION AND LIFE SATISFACTION OF PEOPLE WITH PSYCHIATRIC DISABILITIES?社区心理健康住房中的社会角色赋权:它是否有助于精神疾病患者融入社区并提高生活满意度?
J Community Psychol. 2013 Mar;41(2):218-235. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21524.