Jorge-Monteiro Maria Fátima, Ornelas José Henrique
ISPA - Instituto Universitário, Rua Jardim do Tabaco, 34, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal.
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2014 Nov 25;8:48. doi: 10.1186/1752-4458-8-48. eCollection 2014.
This study examines the reliability and validity of the Portuguese version of the Empowerment Scale (ES) to be used in the community/psychosocial mental health field. Authors also reviewed the properties of the development and cross-cultural adaptation of the ES. Because mental health services are required to encourage empowerment and recovery-oriented interventions, adequate empowerment-oriented outcome measures are needed to evaluate services and study interventions across countries.
The current research was part of a larger research project with 213 participants. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to observe the ES's construct-related validity, and a reliability analysis for internal consistency. The ES concurrent validity with the recovery and psychiatric symptoms measures was also assessed using the Pearson's correlation coefficient.
The CFA supported the five-factor configuration for the refined model of measure as satisfactory. The Portuguese version of the ES presented an overall satisfactory reliability (α = .79) and was positively correlated with personal recovery (r = .71) and inversely with psychiatric symptoms (r = -.22).
The overall scale was considered reliable and valid to be used by Portuguese researchers and practitioners to evaluate empowering interventions in mental health services. Furthermore, in the effort to increase ES construct-related validity, this article suggests further improvements to enhance the empowerment measure.
本研究考察了用于社区/心理社会心理健康领域的葡萄牙语版赋权量表(ES)的信效度。作者还回顾了ES的编制及跨文化适应特性。由于心理健康服务需要鼓励赋权和以康复为导向的干预措施,因此需要有足够的以赋权为导向的结果测量工具来评估各国的服务并研究干预措施。
本研究是一个更大研究项目的一部分,有213名参与者。进行了验证性因素分析(CFA)以观察ES的结构效度,并进行了内部一致性的信度分析。还使用皮尔逊相关系数评估了ES与康复及精神症状测量的同时效度。
CFA支持测量的优化模型的五因素结构令人满意。葡萄牙语版的ES总体信度令人满意(α = 0.79),与个人康复呈正相关(r = 0.71),与精神症状呈负相关(r = -0.22)。
总体量表被认为可靠且有效,可供葡萄牙研究人员和从业者用于评估心理健康服务中的赋权干预措施。此外,为提高ES的结构效度,本文建议进一步改进以加强赋权测量。