Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 16;108(33):13659-64. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1104681108. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
Basic ideas about the constancy and randomness of mutagenesis that drives evolution were challenged by the discovery of mutation pathways activated by stress responses. These pathways could promote evolution specifically when cells are maladapted to their environment (i.e., are stressed). However, the clearest example--a general stress-response-controlled switch to error-prone DNA break (double-strand break, DSB) repair--was suggested to be peculiar to an Escherichia coli F' conjugative plasmid, not generally significant, and to occur by an alternative stress-independent mechanism. Moreover, mechanisms of spontaneous mutation in E. coli remain obscure. First, we demonstrate that this same mechanism occurs in chromosomes of starving F(-) E. coli. I-SceI endonuclease-induced chromosomal DSBs increase mutation 50-fold, dependent upon general/starvation- and DNA-damage-stress responses, DinB error-prone DNA polymerase, and DSB-repair proteins. Second, DSB repair is also mutagenic if the RpoS general-stress-response activator is expressed in unstressed cells, illustrating a stress-response-controlled switch to mutagenic repair. Third, DSB survival is not improved by RpoS or DinB, indicating that mutagenesis is not an inescapable byproduct of repair. Importantly, fourth, fully half of spontaneous frame-shift and base-substitution mutation during starvation also requires the same stress-response, DSB-repair, and DinB proteins. These data indicate that DSB-repair-dependent stress-induced mutation, driven by spontaneous DNA breaks, is a pathway that cells usually use and a major source of spontaneous mutation. These data also rule out major alternative models for the mechanism. Mechanisms that couple mutagenesis to stress responses can allow cells to evolve rapidly and responsively to their environment.
导致进化的突变随机性和恒定性的基本观点受到了应激反应激活的突变途径的发现的挑战。这些途径可以在细胞不适应环境(即受到压力)时促进进化。然而,最明显的例子——一种普遍的应激反应控制的易错 DNA 断裂(双链断裂,DSB)修复开关——被认为是大肠杆菌 F' 接合质粒所特有的,不是普遍存在的,并且通过一种替代的应激独立机制发生。此外,大肠杆菌自发突变的机制仍然不清楚。首先,我们证明了同样的机制也发生在饥饿的 F(-)大肠杆菌染色体中。I-SceI 内切酶诱导的染色体 DSB 增加了 50 倍的突变,这依赖于普遍/饥饿和 DNA 损伤应激反应、DinB 易错 DNA 聚合酶和 DSB 修复蛋白。其次,如果在未受应激的细胞中表达 RpoS 一般应激反应激活物,DSB 修复也是诱变的,说明了应激反应控制的诱变修复开关。第三,DSB 存活不被 RpoS 或 DinB 改善,表明突变不是修复的不可避免的副产物。重要的是,第四,饥饿期间完全一半的自发移码和碱基替换突变也需要相同的应激反应、DSB 修复和 DinB 蛋白。这些数据表明,由自发 DNA 断裂驱动的 DSB 修复依赖性应激诱导突变是细胞通常使用的途径,也是自发突变的主要来源。这些数据还排除了主要的替代机制模型。将突变与应激反应偶联的机制可以使细胞能够快速和响应地适应其环境。