Veronesi Marco, Mancini Elena, Salvati Filippo, Santoro Antonio
U.O. Nefrologia, Dialisi e Ipertensione, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
G Ital Nefrol. 2011 Jul-Aug;28(4):436-40.
A 67-year-old woman with end-stage renal disease (polycystic kidney disease) who had been on dialysis for 10 years came to our department for a second opinion about upper left arm edema homolateral to the arteriovenous fistula (AVF). Because of the suspicion of venous stenosis she had already been submitted to angiographic examination of the AVF which, however, did not show any occlusive process. In addition to the kidney problem, the clinical history included dilated cardiomyopathy, and 2 years earlier a biventricular implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) had been placed. The patient had never had a central venous catheter (CVC). She presented a typical superior vena cava syndrome picture with arm, neck and hemifacial edema and superficial cutaneous venous reticulum. The venous pressure during extracoroporeal circulation was high and blood recirculation was documented. Angio-CT was performed to look for a compressive process in the chest, but this was excluded. We then performed a new trans-AVF angiography to study extensively the axillary-subclavian-superior vena cava district. At first, no stenosis or thrombosis was observed, but the presence of ICD and its leads (left-sided implanted) in the anonymous vein created obstacles to diagnosis. Repeated injections of contrast medium and focusing imaging on the leads route allowed us to highlight a venous stenosis in the anonymous vein. Transluminal angioplasty was successfully carried out during the same procedure. 1) In hemodialysis patients the appearance of signs of intrathoracic vein drainage obstacles is not always associated with previous CVC implantation; 2) in the hemodialysis patient, any device (PM, ICD) should be implanted contralaterally to the fistula arm in order to avoid the risk that a venous stenosis may cause AVF dysfunction.
一名67岁患有终末期肾病(多囊肾病)且已接受10年透析治疗的女性来到我们科室,就动静脉内瘘(AVF)同侧左上臂水肿问题寻求第二种意见。由于怀疑存在静脉狭窄,她已经接受了AVF的血管造影检查,但未发现任何闭塞性病变。除了肾脏问题外,临床病史还包括扩张型心肌病,且两年前植入了双心室植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)。该患者从未使用过中心静脉导管(CVC)。她表现出典型的上腔静脉综合征症状,伴有手臂、颈部和半侧面部水肿以及浅表皮肤静脉网。体外循环期间静脉压力很高,且有血液再循环记录。进行了血管CT检查以寻找胸部的压迫性病变,但排除了这种情况。然后我们进行了一次新的经AVF血管造影,以广泛研究腋静脉-锁骨下静脉-上腔静脉区域。起初,未观察到狭窄或血栓形成,但ICD及其导线(左侧植入)在无名静脉中的存在给诊断带来了障碍。反复注射造影剂并将成像聚焦在导线走行上,使我们能够突出显示无名静脉中的静脉狭窄。在同一手术过程中成功进行了腔内血管成形术。1)在血液透析患者中,胸内静脉引流障碍体征的出现并不总是与先前的CVC植入有关;2)在血液透析患者中,任何装置(起搏器、ICD)都应植入与内瘘臂对侧,以避免静脉狭窄可能导致AVF功能障碍的风险。