Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX 77341, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2012 Jan;27(2):316-43. doi: 10.1177/0886260511416478. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
Among other arguments, advocates for lifting bans on carrying concealed handguns on campus propose that this would increase the prevalence of legitimately carried handguns, which might then deter crimes or be used to intervene in campus shooting incidents like the one that took place at Virginia Tech in 2007. Opponents suggest that increased prevalence of concealed handguns would lead to increases in other negative consequences, such as accidental shootings. Little empirical research has examined the potential outcomes of such a policy change, nor has existing research examined the prerequisite issue of whether lifting these bans would result in substantial increases in the prevalence of concealed handguns among students. Using a sample of undergraduate classrooms selected from five academic buildings at a public university in Texas, this study examines the potential impact of lifting the concealed handgun ban on the likelihood that a given classroom would contain at least one legally carried handgun. Results reveal that the impact of potential policy changes in this area vary based on the building under consideration and the measure of potential handgun prevalence. Limitations of the study and implications for future research on the issue of concealed handgun carrying on college campuses are discussed.
除其他论点外,支持取消校园内携带隐蔽式枪支禁令的人提出,这将增加合法携带枪支的普遍性,从而可能阻止犯罪,或用于干预像 2007 年发生在弗吉尼亚理工大学那样的校园枪击事件。反对者则认为,隐蔽式枪支的普遍性增加会导致其他负面后果,如意外枪击事件的增加。很少有实证研究探讨这一政策变化的潜在结果,也没有现有研究探讨取消这些禁令是否会导致学生中隐蔽式枪支的普遍性大幅增加这一前提问题。本研究使用从德克萨斯州一所公立大学的五栋教学楼中选取的本科生课堂样本,考察了取消隐蔽式枪支禁令对特定课堂至少有一把合法携带枪支的可能性的潜在影响。研究结果表明,这一领域的潜在政策变化的影响取决于所考虑的建筑物和潜在枪支普遍性的衡量标准。本研究的局限性以及对大学校园隐蔽式枪支携带问题的未来研究的启示进行了讨论。