Dr. Wilke GmbH, inspiring.health, Joseph-Wild-Str. 13, 81829 Munich, Germany.
Eur J Med Res. 2011 Jul 25;16(7):315-23. doi: 10.1186/2047-783x-16-7-315.
Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) often occurring as ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most frequent hospital infection in intensive care units (ICU). Early adequate antimicrobial therapy is an essential determinant of clinical outcome. Organisations like the German PEG or ATS/ IDSA provide guidelines for the initial calculated treatment in the absence of pathogen identification. We conducted a retrospective chart review for patients with HAP/VAP and assessed whether the initial intravenous antibiotic therapy (IIAT) was adequate according to the PEG guidelines.
We collected data from 5 tertiary care hospitals. Electronic data filtering identified 895 patients with potential HAP/VAP. After chart review we finally identified 221 patients meeting the definition of HAP/VAP. Primary study endpoints were clinical improvement, survival and length of stay. Secondary endpoints included duration of mechanical ventilation, total costs, costs incurred on the intensive care unit (ICU), costs incurred on general wards and drug costs.
We found that 107 patients received adequate initial intravenous antibiotic therapy (IIAT) vs. 114 with inadequate IIAT according to the PEG guidelines. Baseline characteristics of both groups revealed no significant differences and good comparability. Clinical improvement was 64% over all patients and 82% (85/104) in the subpopulation with adequate IIAT while only 47% (48/103) inadequately treated patients improved (p< 0.001). The odds ratio of therapeutic success with GA versus NGA treatment was 5.821 (p<0.001, [95% CI: 2.712-12.497]). Survival was 80% for the total population (n = 221), 86% in the adequately treated (92/107) and 74% in the inadequately treated subpopulation (84/114) (p = 0.021). The odds ratio of mortality for GA vs. NGA treatment was 0.565 (p=0.117, [95% CI: 0.276-1.155]). Adequately treated patients had a significantly shorter length of stay (LOS) (23.9 vs. 28.3 days; p = 0.022), require significantly less hours of mechanical ventilation (175 vs. 274; p = 0.001), incurred lower total costs (EUR 28,033 vs. EUR 36,139, p = 0.006) and lower ICU-related costs (EUR 13,308 vs. EUR 18,666, p = 0.003). Drug costs for the hospital stay were also lower (EUR 4,069 vs. EUR 4,833) yet not significant. The most frequent types of inadequate therapy were monotherapy instead of combination therapy, wrong type of penicillin and wrong type of cephalosporin.
These findings are consistent with those from other studies analyzing the impact of guideline adherence on survival rates, clinical success, LOS and costs. However, inadequately treated patients had a higher complicated pathogen risk score (CPRS) compared to those who received adequate therapy. This shows that therapy based on local experiences may be sufficient for patients with low CPRS but inadequate for those with high CPRS. Linear regression models showed that single items of the CPRS like extrapulmonary organ failure or late onset had no significant influence on the results.
Guideline-adherent initial intravenous antibiotic therapy is clinically superior, saves lives and is less expensive than non guideline adherent therapy. Using a CPRS score can be a useful tool to determine the right choice of initial intravenous antibiotic therapy. The net effect on the German healthcare system per year is estimated at up to 2,042 lives and EUR 125,819,000 saved if guideline-adherent initial therapy for HAP/VAP were established in all German ICUs.
医院获得性肺炎(HAP)常发生于呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP),是重症监护病房(ICU)中最常见的医院感染。早期充分的抗菌治疗是临床转归的重要决定因素。德国 PEG 或 ATS/IDSA 等组织为没有病原体鉴定的情况下初始计算治疗提供了指南。我们对 HAP/VAP 患者进行了回顾性图表审查,并评估了根据 PEG 指南初始静脉抗生素治疗(IIAT)是否足够。
我们从 5 家三级护理医院收集数据。电子数据筛选确定了 895 名潜在 HAP/VAP 患者。经过图表审查,我们最终确定了 221 名符合 HAP/VAP 定义的患者。主要研究终点为临床改善、存活率和住院时间。次要终点包括机械通气时间、总费用、重症监护病房(ICU)相关费用、普通病房相关费用和药物费用。
我们发现,根据 PEG 指南,107 名患者接受了足够的初始静脉抗生素治疗(IIAT),114 名患者接受了不足的 IIAT。两组的基线特征无显著差异,具有良好的可比性。所有患者的临床改善率为 64%,接受足够 IIAT 的亚组为 82%(85/104),而接受不足 IIAT 的患者仅为 47%(48/103)改善(p<0.001)。GA 与 NGA 治疗的治疗成功率的优势比为 5.821(p<0.001,[95%CI:2.712-12.497])。总人群(n=221)的存活率为 80%,充分治疗组(92/107)为 86%,治疗不足组(84/114)为 74%(p=0.021)。GA 与 NGA 治疗的死亡率的优势比为 0.565(p=0.117,[95%CI:0.276-1.155])。充分治疗的患者住院时间(LOS)显著缩短(23.9 天 vs. 28.3 天;p=0.022),机械通气时间显著减少(175 小时 vs. 274 小时;p=0.001),总费用显著降低(EUR 28033 欧元 vs. EUR 36139 欧元,p=0.006),ICU 相关费用显著降低(EUR 13308 欧元 vs. EUR 18666 欧元,p=0.003)。住院期间的药物费用也较低(EUR 4069 欧元 vs. EUR 4833 欧元),但无统计学意义。最常见的治疗不足类型是单一治疗而非联合治疗、青霉素类型错误和头孢菌素类型错误。
这些发现与其他分析遵循指南对生存率、临床成功率、LOS 和成本影响的研究结果一致。然而,治疗不足的患者的复杂病原体风险评分(CPRS)高于接受充分治疗的患者。这表明,基于当地经验的治疗可能对 CPRS 较低的患者足够,但对 CPRS 较高的患者则不足。线性回归模型显示,CPRS 的单个项目,如肺外器官衰竭或晚期发病,对结果没有显著影响。
遵循指南的初始静脉抗生素治疗在临床上更优,可提高生存率,降低死亡率,并且比不遵循指南的治疗更经济。使用 CPRS 评分可以作为确定初始静脉抗生素治疗的正确选择的有用工具。如果在所有德国 ICU 中建立 HAP/VAP 的指南依从性初始治疗,估计每年可为德国医疗保健系统节省多达 2042 条生命和 1.25819 亿欧元。