• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信任、选择与权力:精神病患者的经历

Trust, choice and power in mental health care: experiences of patients with psychosis.

机构信息

Cornwall Partnership Trust and Peninsula Medical School, Liskeard, UK.

出版信息

Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2012 Sep;58(5):496-504. doi: 10.1177/0020764011408658. Epub 2011 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1177/0020764011408658
PMID:21813486
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trust, choice and power are critical issues in clinical practice, public policies and a post-modern understanding of mental health care. We aimed to investigate the experiences and attitudes of patients with psychosis in relation to trust, choice and power.

METHOD

We conducted 20 in-depth interviews with patients with psychotic disorders in care of NHS services. The interviews were subjected to thematic analysis.

DISCUSSION

Patients discussed aspects of their care in terms of dimensions that enhance or undermine trust, choice and power. Two interpretive themes emerged from this data. First, patients perceive the need for a shifting balance of power, according to the severity of their illness and their own experience of care, but feel that threats of coercion and neglect disable them. Second, they appreciate the expertise of clinicians, but particularly value 'the personal touch' that goes beyond this expertise, including personal disclosure about their own lives, common acts of kindness and conversation outside clinical matters. Patients view trust as a two-way process with responsibility shared between patient and clinician.

CONCLUSIONS

The active involvement of patients with psychosis in their individual care may be strengthened, particularly when they are not acutely ill and have more experience of their illness. While patients value expertise and respect in interactions with clinicians, they also appreciate a 'personal touch', which may go beyond current notions of professionalism.

摘要

背景

信任、选择和权力是临床实践、公共政策和后现代心理健康护理理解中的关键问题。我们旨在调查精神病患者在信任、选择和权力方面的经验和态度。

方法

我们对 NHS 服务护理下的精神障碍患者进行了 20 次深入访谈。对访谈进行了主题分析。

讨论

患者根据增强或削弱信任、选择和权力的维度讨论了他们的护理方面。从这些数据中得出了两个解释性主题。首先,患者认为需要根据疾病的严重程度和自己的护理体验来调整权力平衡,但他们感到威胁到强制和忽视会使他们失去权力。其次,他们欣赏临床医生的专业知识,但特别重视超越这一专业知识的“个人关怀”,包括对自己生活的个人披露、常见的善举和临床事务之外的交谈。患者将信任视为患者和临床医生之间共同承担责任的双向过程。

结论

可以加强精神病患者对其个人护理的积极参与,尤其是当他们没有急性疾病且有更多的疾病经验时。虽然患者在与临床医生的互动中重视专业知识和尊重,但他们也欣赏一种超越当前专业概念的“个人关怀”。

相似文献

1
Trust, choice and power in mental health care: experiences of patients with psychosis.信任、选择与权力:精神病患者的经历
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2012 Sep;58(5):496-504. doi: 10.1177/0020764011408658. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
2
The influence of power dynamics and trust on multidisciplinary collaboration: a qualitative case study of type 2 diabetes mellitus.权力动态和信任对多学科合作的影响:2 型糖尿病的定性案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Mar 13;12:63. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-63.
3
Ethnicity and power in the mental health system: experiences of white British and black Caribbean people with psychosis.精神卫生系统中的种族与权力:英国白人及加勒比裔黑人精神病患者的经历
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2021 Feb 5;30:e12. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020001043.
4
Subjective experience and meaning of delusions in psychosis: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis.精神病中妄想的主观体验与意义:一项系统综述和定性证据综合分析
Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;9(6):458-476. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00104-3. Epub 2022 May 4.
5
Trust, choice and power in mental health: a literature review.心理健康中的信任、选择与权力:文献综述
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2006 Nov;41(11):843-52. doi: 10.1007/s00127-006-0123-6. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
6
Harnessing the power of language to enhance patient experience of the NHS complaint journey in Northern Ireland: a mixed-methods study.利用语言的力量来改善北爱尔兰国民保健服务投诉之旅中的患者体验:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(33):1-129. doi: 10.3310/NRGA3207.
7
The impact of early intervention psychosis services on hospitalisation experiences: a qualitative study with young people and their carers.早期干预精神病服务对住院经历的影响:一项针对年轻人及其照顾者的定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 May 10;24(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05758-4.
8
Service user and carer experiences of seeking help for a first episode of psychosis: a UK qualitative study.服务使用者和照顾者在寻求首次精神病发作帮助方面的体验:英国的一项定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Sep 30;11:157. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-157.
9
Exploring experiences of and attitudes towards mental illness and disclosure amongst health care professionals: a qualitative study.探讨医疗保健专业人员对精神疾病的体验、态度和披露情况:一项定性研究。
J Ment Health. 2017 Oct;26(5):457-463. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2017.1322184. Epub 2017 May 10.
10
Perspective matters in recovery: the views of persons with severe mental illness, family and mental health professionals on collaboration during recovery, a qualitative study.在康复中视角很重要:严重精神疾病患者、家属和精神健康专业人员对康复期间合作的看法,一项定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Nov 14;24(1):802. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06198-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Two people making sense of a story: narrative exposure therapy as a trauma intervention in early intervention in psychosis.两人理解一个故事:叙事暴露疗法作为精神病早期干预中的创伤干预。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2355829. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2355829. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
2
SafeVRwards: Designing a complementary virtual reality module to the Safewards framework intended to relax and manage conflict in mental health wards.SafeVRwards:设计一个与 Safewards 框架互补的虚拟现实模块,旨在放松和管理精神病房的冲突。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jun 4;13(2):e002769. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002769.
3
Supported decision-making interventions in mental healthcare: A systematic review of current evidence and implementation barriers.
精神卫生保健中的支持性决策干预措施:当前证据及实施障碍的系统评价
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14001. doi: 10.1111/hex.14001.
4
Trust of patients and families in mental healthcare providers and institutions: a cross-cultural study in Chennai, India, and Montreal, Canada.患者和家属对精神卫生保健提供者和机构的信任:在印度钦奈和加拿大蒙特利尔的跨文化研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024 May;59(5):813-825. doi: 10.1007/s00127-023-02576-z. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
5
The lived experience of psychosis: a bottom-up review co-written by experts by experience and academics.精神病的亲身经历:由有亲身经历的专家和学者共同撰写的自下而上的综述。
World Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;21(2):168-188. doi: 10.1002/wps.20959.
6
Threats to epistemic agency in young people with unusual experiences and beliefs.有异常经历和信念的年轻人的认知能动性所面临的威胁。
Synthese. 2021;199(3-4):7689-7704. doi: 10.1007/s11229-021-03133-4. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
7
Community treatment orders and care planning: How is engagement and decision-making enacted?社区治疗令和护理计划:如何实施参与和决策?
Health Expect. 2021 Oct;24(5):1859-1867. doi: 10.1111/hex.13329. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
8
Diversity, Complexity and Ordinality: Mental Health Services Outside the Institutions-Service Users' and Professionals' Experience-Based Practices and Knowledges, and New Public Management.多样性、复杂性和有序性:机构外精神卫生服务——服务使用者和专业人员基于经验的实践和知识,以及新公共管理。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 2;18(13):7075. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137075.
9
The Patients' Practises Disclosing Subjective Experiences in the Psychiatric Intake Interview.患者在精神科入院访谈中披露主观经历的行为
Front Psychiatry. 2021 May 10;12:605760. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.605760. eCollection 2021.
10
Silver linings: Observed reductions in aggression and use of restraints and seclusion in psychiatric inpatient care during COVID-19.一线希望:在 COVID-19 期间,精神科住院患者的攻击行为以及约束和隔离的使用观察到减少。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Apr;29(2):381-385. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12752. Epub 2021 Mar 31.