Ulster University, Belfast, UK.
University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(33):1-129. doi: 10.3310/NRGA3207.
Good communication is consistently recognised as essential for effective complaint handling, while failures in communication correlate with risk of escalation. Nonetheless, communication in National Health Service complaint handling remains underexamined.
To examine complainants' lived experience of the complaints journey through (1) micro-analysis of their communication with National Health Service representatives; (2) their self-reported expectations and experiences throughout the complaints journey; to survey patient perceptions of the culture of the National Health Service; to develop 'Real Complaints' - an evidence-based communication training resource.
The project triangulates microlevel conversation analysis and discourse analysis of spoken and written complaints encounters with complainants' appraisals of those encounters in longitudinal case studies. This is underpinned by an audit of patient views of the cultural-institutional context of the National Health Service.
Data were gathered in the complaints-handling services of two National Health Service trusts and a Patient Advocacy Service in Northern Ireland. Twenty-three complainants consented to longitudinal data collection and 58 to initial encounter recording; 115 members of the Patient Advocacy Service mailing list completed the cultural audit; 3 trust complaint handlers, 1 Patient Advocacy Service complaint handler and 2 trust complaints managers were interviewed.
This yielded 1155 minutes of recorded calls, 113 written encounters, 36 diaries, 6 meetings, 23 interviews and 115 cultural audit responses collected over a period of 24 months.
Our analysis illuminates the dual nature of complaints: as personal expressions of dissatisfaction and as systemic critiques. The complaint experience is a dynamic journey with evolving narratives reflecting complainants' shifting perceptions, expectations and experiences of the 'system', both moment-by-moment and encounter-by-encounter in the overall journey. Key interpersonal priorities for complainants significantly affected complaint outcomes, most important of which was the need to be respected as a 'reasonable complainant'. Also key is the conversation analytic concept of affiliation, which involves taking a stance towards the event(s) being described that matches the complainant's stance. Use of affiliation by call handlers supported effective and efficient person-centred complaints handling, while absence of affiliation typically led to escalation of the scope, scale and emotional intensity of the complaint, sometimes to the point of an expressed intention to litigate (particularly in the case of written responses). Viewed holistically, successful complaints communication requires person-centredness, and affiliative interactions framed by shared expectations. These findings were applied in the development of Real Complaints Training and Guidance for spoken and written complaints communication.
The COVID pandemic significantly constrained trust participation, particularly the participation of front-line clinical staff, and one trust introduced 'telephone resolution' to which we were not given access. Additionally, calls viewed by staff as 'challenging' and ethnic minority communities are both under-represented in the final data set.
Addressing the complainant's desire to be perceived as reasonable was revealed as crucial for fostering a more person-centred approach to handling complaints and addressing the gap between expectations and experience. This finding holds particular significance for recommendations, guidance and training relating to both spoken and written communication.
Direct extensions of the project include the piloting and evaluation of Real Complaints Training and further primary research involving communication between complainants and front-line service/clinical staff and complaint handling by ombudsman complaints investigators. An emerging question relates to social exclusion and access to complaints procedures.
This study is registered as Research Registry: researchregistry5049.
This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR127367) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research Vol. 12, No. 33. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
良好的沟通被一致认为是有效投诉处理的关键,而沟通失败与升级风险相关。尽管如此,国家卫生服务投诉处理中的沟通仍未得到充分研究。
通过(1)对投诉人与国家卫生服务代表之间的沟通进行微观分析;(2)他们在投诉过程中的自我报告期望和经验;调查患者对国家卫生服务文化的看法;开发“真实投诉”——一种基于证据的沟通培训资源,来研究投诉人在投诉过程中的体验。
该项目将微观层面的对话分析和话语分析与投诉人在纵向案例研究中对这些遭遇的评估相结合。这是基于对患者对国家卫生服务文化机构背景的看法进行审计的。
数据来自北爱尔兰两个国家卫生服务信托机构和一个患者倡导服务机构的投诉处理服务。23 名投诉人同意进行纵向数据收集,58 人同意初始遭遇记录;115 名患者倡导服务名单完成了文化审计;3 名投诉处理人员、1 名患者倡导服务投诉处理人员和 2 名投诉处理经理接受了采访。
这产生了 1155 分钟的记录通话、113 次书面遭遇、36 份日记、6 次会议、23 次访谈和 115 次文化审计响应,收集时间为 24 个月。
我们的分析揭示了投诉的双重性质:既是个人不满的表达,也是对系统的批评。投诉体验是一个动态的旅程,随着投诉人对“系统”的看法、期望和体验的不断变化,叙事也在不断演变,无论是在整个旅程中的瞬间还是遭遇中。对投诉人来说,关键的人际优先事项极大地影响了投诉结果,最重要的是需要被尊重为“合理的投诉人”。同样重要的是会话分析中的关联概念,它涉及到对正在描述的事件采取与投诉人立场相匹配的立场。呼叫处理人员使用关联支持了有效和高效的以人中心的投诉处理,而关联的缺失通常会导致投诉的范围、规模和情绪强度升级,有时甚至会导致表达诉讼意图(特别是在书面回复的情况下)。从整体上看,成功的投诉沟通需要以人为中心,并且关联的互动要以共同的期望为框架。这些发现被应用于“真实投诉”培训和指导的发展,用于口头和书面投诉沟通。
COVID-19 大流行极大地限制了信托机构的参与,特别是一线临床工作人员的参与,并且一个信托机构引入了“电话解决方案”,我们无法访问。此外,工作人员认为“具有挑战性”的电话和少数民族社区在最终数据集都代表性不足。
满足投诉人被视为合理的愿望被揭示为培养更以人为中心的投诉处理方法和解决期望与经验之间差距的关键。这一发现对涉及口头和书面沟通的建议、指导和培训具有特别重要的意义。
该项目的直接扩展包括“真实投诉”培训的试点和评估,以及涉及投诉人与一线服务/临床工作人员之间沟通和投诉处理人员投诉调查员之间沟通的进一步初步研究。一个新出现的问题涉及社会排斥和获得投诉程序。
本研究已在 Research Registry 注册:researchregistry5049。
该奖项由国家卫生研究院(NIHR)健康和社会保健交付研究计划(NIHR 奖号:NIHR127367)资助,并在健康和社会保健交付研究第 12 卷第 33 期全文发表。有关进一步的奖励信息,请访问 NIHR 资助和奖励网站。