Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular and Immunological Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011 Nov;38(11):2040-9. doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1891-0. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
This meta-analysis summarized the accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) and stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with arterial hypertension.
We searched for studies in which stress MPS or stress echocardiography were performed to detect CAD in hypertensive patients, with coronary angiography used as the reference test, published from January 1980 to December 2010. Studies performed in patients with known CAD, acute coronary syndrome and previous revascularization procedures were excluded.
Of 1,263 studies, 13 met the inclusion criteria. Pooled summary estimates showed that stress MPS had a sensitivity of 0.90 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-0.95] and a specificity of 0.63 (95% CI 0.53-0.72). For stress MPS, the area under the curve (AUC) at the summary receiver-operating characteristic (SROC) graph was 0.83 (95% CI 0.80-0.86). At meta-regression analysis, the presence of positive stress electrocardiography as inclusion criterion was the only significant effect modifier (p < 0.01). Pooled summary estimates showed that stress echocardiography had a sensitivity of 0.77 (95% CI 0.69-0.83) and a specificity of 0.89 (95% CI 0.83-0.93). For stress echocardiography, the AUC at SROC was 0.91 (95% CI 0.88-0.93). At the meta-regression analysis no significant effect modifier was detected.
MPS has high sensitivity for detecting CAD in hypertensive patients, with specificity comparable to that reported in the general population, whereas stress echocardiography shows higher specificity but substantially reduced sensitivity compared to MPS.
本荟萃分析总结了应激心肌灌注闪烁显像(MPS)和应激超声心动图在诊断高血压患者冠心病(CAD)中的准确性。
我们检索了 1980 年 1 月至 2010 年 12 月期间发表的研究,这些研究使用冠状动脉造影作为参考试验,对高血压患者进行应激 MPS 或应激超声心动图检查以检测 CAD。排除了已知 CAD、急性冠状动脉综合征和先前血管重建术的患者进行的研究。
在 1263 项研究中,有 13 项符合纳入标准。汇总的综合估计显示,应激 MPS 的敏感性为 0.90[95%置信区间(CI)0.82-0.95],特异性为 0.63(95%CI 0.53-0.72)。对于应激 MPS,汇总受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.83(95%CI 0.80-0.86)。在荟萃回归分析中,纳入标准中存在阳性应激心电图是唯一有统计学意义的效应修饰因素(p<0.01)。汇总的综合估计显示,应激超声心动图的敏感性为 0.77(95%CI 0.69-0.83),特异性为 0.89(95%CI 0.83-0.93)。对于应激超声心动图,SROC 的 AUC 为 0.91(95%CI 0.88-0.93)。在荟萃回归分析中,未检测到有统计学意义的效应修饰因素。
MPS 对高血压患者 CAD 的检测具有较高的敏感性,特异性与一般人群报道的相似,而应激超声心动图的特异性较高,但敏感性明显低于 MPS。