Kim Hyung Hoi, Cho Kyung-Won, Kim Hye Sook, Kim Ju-Sim, Kim Jung Hyun, Han Sang Pil, Park Chun Bok, Kim Seok, Chae Young Moon
Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Healthc Inform Res. 2011 Mar;17(1):67-75. doi: 10.4258/hir.2011.17.1.67. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
This study presents the information system for Pusan National University Hospital (PNUH), evaluates its performance qualitatively, and conducts economic analysis.
Information system for PNUH was designed by component-based development and developed by internet technologies. Order Communication System, Electronic Medical Record, and Clinical Decision Support System were newly developed. The performance of the hospital information system was qualitatively evaluated based on the performance reference model in order to identify problem areas for the old system. The Information Economics approach was used to analyze the economic feasibility of hospital information system in order to account for the intangible benefits.
Average performance scores were 3.16 for input layer, 3.35 for process layer, and 3.57 for business layer. In addition, the cumulative benefit to cost ratio was 0.50 in 2011, 1.73 in 2012, 1.76 in 2013, 1.71 in 2014, and 1.71 in 2015. The B/C ratios steadily increase as value items are added.
While overall performance scores were reasonably high, doctors were less satisfied with the system, perhaps due to the weak clinical function in the systems. The information economics analysis demonstrated the economic profitability of the information systems if all intangible benefits were included. The second qualitative evaluation survey and economic analysis were proposed to evaluate the changes in performance of the new system.
本研究介绍了釜山国立大学医院(PNUH)的信息系统,对其性能进行定性评估,并进行经济分析。
PNUH的信息系统采用基于组件的开发方式进行设计,并通过互联网技术进行开发。新开发了订单通信系统、电子病历和临床决策支持系统。基于性能参考模型对医院信息系统的性能进行定性评估,以确定旧系统存在问题的领域。采用信息经济学方法分析医院信息系统的经济可行性,以考虑无形收益。
输入层的平均性能得分为3.16,处理层为3.35,业务层为3.57。此外,2011年的累计效益成本比为0.50,2012年为1.73,2013年为1.76,2014年为1.71,2015年为1.71。随着价值项目的增加,效益成本比稳步上升。
虽然总体性能得分相当高,但医生对该系统的满意度较低,这可能是由于系统中的临床功能较弱。信息经济学分析表明,如果将所有无形收益包括在内,信息系统具有经济盈利能力。建议进行第二次定性评估调查和经济分析,以评估新系统性能的变化。