• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众对炭疽袭击的反应:在一个涉及不明来源吸入性炭疽的场景中对大规模预防措施的反应。

Public response to an anthrax attack: reactions to mass prophylaxis in a scenario involving inhalation anthrax from an unidentified source.

作者信息

SteelFisher Gillian, Blendon Robert, Ross Laura J, Collins Blanche C, Ben-Porath Eran N, Bekheit Mark M, Mailhot Johanna R

机构信息

Harvard Opinion Research Program, Harvard School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Kresge, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Biosecur Bioterror. 2011 Sep;9(3):239-50. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2011.0005. Epub 2011 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1089/bsp.2011.0005
PMID:21819225
Abstract

An attack with Bacillus anthracis ("anthrax") is a known threat to the United States. When weaponized, it can cause inhalation anthrax, the deadliest form of the disease. Due to the rapid course of inhalation anthrax, delays in initiation of antibiotics may decrease survival chances. Because a rapid response would require cooperation from the public, there is a need to understand the public's response to possible mass dispensing programs. To examine the public's response to a mass prophylaxis program, this study used a nationally representative poll of 1,092 adults, supplemented by a targeted focus on 3 metropolitan areas where anthrax attacks occurred in 2001: New York City (n=517), Washington, DC (n=509), and Trenton/Mercer County, NJ (n=507). The poll was built around a "worst-case scenario" in which cases of inhalation anthrax are discovered without an identified source and the entire population of a city or town is asked to receive antibiotic prophylaxis within a 48-hour period. Findings from this poll provide important signs of public willingness to comply with public health recommendations for obtaining antibiotics from a dispensing site, although they also indicate that public health officials may face several challenges to compliance, including misinformation about the contagiousness of inhalation anthrax; fears about personal safety in crowds; distrust of government agencies to provide sufficient, safe, and effective medicine; and hesitation about ingesting antibiotic pills after receiving them. In general, people living in areas where anthrax attacks occurred in 2001 had responses similar to those of the nation as a whole.

摘要

炭疽芽孢杆菌攻击(“炭疽”)是美国面临的已知威胁。当被武器化时,它可导致吸入性炭疽,这是该疾病最致命的形式。由于吸入性炭疽病程进展迅速,延迟使用抗生素可能会降低生存几率。因为快速应对需要公众的合作,所以有必要了解公众对可能的大规模药物分发计划的反应。为了研究公众对大规模预防计划的反应,本研究对1092名成年人进行了具有全国代表性的民意调查,并针对2001年发生炭疽攻击的3个大都市地区进行了有针对性的重点调查:纽约市(n = 517)、华盛顿特区(n = 509)和新泽西州特伦顿/默瑟县(n = 507)。该民意调查围绕一种“最坏情况”展开,即发现吸入性炭疽病例但来源不明,要求一个城市或城镇的全体居民在48小时内接受抗生素预防。这项民意调查的结果提供了公众愿意遵守从分发点获取抗生素的公共卫生建议的重要迹象,尽管这些结果也表明公共卫生官员在确保公众遵守方面可能面临若干挑战,包括对吸入性炭疽传染性的错误信息;对人群中个人安全的担忧;对政府机构提供足够、安全和有效药物的不信任;以及在收到抗生素药片后对服用的犹豫。总体而言,2001年发生炭疽攻击地区的居民的反应与全国整体情况类似。

相似文献

1
Public response to an anthrax attack: reactions to mass prophylaxis in a scenario involving inhalation anthrax from an unidentified source.公众对炭疽袭击的反应:在一个涉及不明来源吸入性炭疽的场景中对大规模预防措施的反应。
Biosecur Bioterror. 2011 Sep;9(3):239-50. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2011.0005. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
2
Public response to an anthrax attack: a multiethnic perspective.公众对炭疽袭击的反应:多民族视角
Biosecur Bioterror. 2012 Dec;10(4):401-11. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2012.0041.
3
The impact of anthrax attacks on the American public.炭疽袭击对美国公众的影响。
MedGenMed. 2002 Apr 17;4(2):1.
4
Update: adverse events associated with anthrax prophylaxis among postal employees--New Jersey, New York City, and the District of Columbia metropolitan area, 2001.最新消息:2001年新泽西州、纽约市及哥伦比亚特区都会区邮政员工中与炭疽预防相关的不良事件
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001 Nov 30;50(47):1051-4.
5
From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Update: adverse events associated with anthrax prophylaxis among postal employees--New Jersey, New York City, and the District of Columbia metropolitan area, 2001.来自疾病控制与预防中心。最新消息:2001年新泽西州、纽约市及哥伦比亚特区都会区邮政员工中与炭疽预防相关的不良事件。
JAMA. 2001 Dec 19;286(23):2935-6.
6
Update: Investigation of bioterrorism-related anthrax, 2001.更新:2001年与生物恐怖主义相关的炭疽调查。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001 Nov 16;50(45):1008-10.
7
Update: Investigation of bioterrorism-related anthrax and interim guidelines for exposure management and antimicrobial therapy, October 2001.更新:2001年10月与生物恐怖主义相关的炭疽调查及暴露管理与抗菌治疗临时指南
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001 Oct 26;50(42):909-19.
8
Cost-effectiveness comparison of response strategies to a large-scale anthrax attack on the chicago metropolitan area: impact of timing and surge capacity.芝加哥大都市区应对大规模炭疽袭击的应对策略的成本效益比较:时间安排和应急能力的影响
Biosecur Bioterror. 2012 Sep;10(3):264-79. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2011.0105. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
9
Screening for Anthrax Postexposure Antibiotic Prophylaxis-The New York City Approach.炭疽暴露后抗生素预防筛查 - 纽约市方法。
Health Secur. 2018 Jul/Aug;16(4):274-279. doi: 10.1089/hs.2018.0025.
10
Demand for prophylaxis after bioterrorism-related anthrax cases, 2001.2001年生物恐怖主义相关炭疽病例后的预防需求。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2005 Jan;11(1):42-8. doi: 10.3201/eid1101.040272.

引用本文的文献

1
Medical preparedness for bioterrorism and chemical warfare: A public health integration review.针对生物恐怖主义和化学战的医疗准备:一项公共卫生整合综述。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 May 2;104(18):e42289. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042289.
2
Experiences and Views of Domestic Summer Travelers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings from a National Survey.《COVID-19 大流行期间国内夏季旅行者的体验和看法:全国调查结果》。
Health Secur. 2021 May-Jun;19(3):338-348. doi: 10.1089/hs.2020.0212. Epub 2021 May 24.
3
Model-Based Recursive Partitioning of Patients' Return Visits to Multispecialty Clinic During the 2009 H1N1 Pandemic Influenza (pH1N1).
基于模型的2009年甲型H1N1流感大流行(pH1N1)期间患者对多专科诊所复诊情况的递归划分
Online J Public Health Inform. 2020 May 16;12(1):e4. doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v12i1.10576. eCollection 2020.
4
Views and Experiences of Travelers from US States to Zika-Affected Areas.前往寨卡疫区的美国旅行者的观点和经历。
Health Secur. 2019 Jul/Aug;17(4):307-323. doi: 10.1089/hs.2019.0008.
5
Recommendations on How to Manage Anticipated Communication Dilemmas Involving Medical Countermeasures in an Emergency.关于如何管理紧急情况下涉及医疗对策的预期沟通难题的建议。
Public Health Rep. 2018 Jul/Aug;133(4):366-378. doi: 10.1177/0033354918773069. Epub 2018 May 30.
6
Modeling Tool for Decision Support during Early Days of an Anthrax Event.炭疽事件早期决策支持建模工具
Emerg Infect Dis. 2017 Jan;23(1):46-55. doi: 10.3201/eid2301.151787.
7
A Learner-led, Discussion-based Elective on Emerging Infectious Disease.一门由学生主导、基于讨论的新兴传染病选修课。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 Aug 25;79(6):81. doi: 10.5688/ajpe79681.
8
Quantitative models of the dose-response and time course of inhalational anthrax in humans.人类吸入性炭疽剂量反应和时程的定量模型。
PLoS Pathog. 2013 Aug;9(8):e1003555. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003555. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
9
Public response to an anthrax attack: a multiethnic perspective.公众对炭疽袭击的反应:多民族视角
Biosecur Bioterror. 2012 Dec;10(4):401-11. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2012.0041.