SteelFisher Gillian, Blendon Robert, Ross Laura J, Collins Blanche C, Ben-Porath Eran N, Bekheit Mark M, Mailhot Johanna R
Harvard Opinion Research Program, Harvard School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Kresge, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Biosecur Bioterror. 2011 Sep;9(3):239-50. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2011.0005. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
An attack with Bacillus anthracis ("anthrax") is a known threat to the United States. When weaponized, it can cause inhalation anthrax, the deadliest form of the disease. Due to the rapid course of inhalation anthrax, delays in initiation of antibiotics may decrease survival chances. Because a rapid response would require cooperation from the public, there is a need to understand the public's response to possible mass dispensing programs. To examine the public's response to a mass prophylaxis program, this study used a nationally representative poll of 1,092 adults, supplemented by a targeted focus on 3 metropolitan areas where anthrax attacks occurred in 2001: New York City (n=517), Washington, DC (n=509), and Trenton/Mercer County, NJ (n=507). The poll was built around a "worst-case scenario" in which cases of inhalation anthrax are discovered without an identified source and the entire population of a city or town is asked to receive antibiotic prophylaxis within a 48-hour period. Findings from this poll provide important signs of public willingness to comply with public health recommendations for obtaining antibiotics from a dispensing site, although they also indicate that public health officials may face several challenges to compliance, including misinformation about the contagiousness of inhalation anthrax; fears about personal safety in crowds; distrust of government agencies to provide sufficient, safe, and effective medicine; and hesitation about ingesting antibiotic pills after receiving them. In general, people living in areas where anthrax attacks occurred in 2001 had responses similar to those of the nation as a whole.
炭疽芽孢杆菌攻击(“炭疽”)是美国面临的已知威胁。当被武器化时,它可导致吸入性炭疽,这是该疾病最致命的形式。由于吸入性炭疽病程进展迅速,延迟使用抗生素可能会降低生存几率。因为快速应对需要公众的合作,所以有必要了解公众对可能的大规模药物分发计划的反应。为了研究公众对大规模预防计划的反应,本研究对1092名成年人进行了具有全国代表性的民意调查,并针对2001年发生炭疽攻击的3个大都市地区进行了有针对性的重点调查:纽约市(n = 517)、华盛顿特区(n = 509)和新泽西州特伦顿/默瑟县(n = 507)。该民意调查围绕一种“最坏情况”展开,即发现吸入性炭疽病例但来源不明,要求一个城市或城镇的全体居民在48小时内接受抗生素预防。这项民意调查的结果提供了公众愿意遵守从分发点获取抗生素的公共卫生建议的重要迹象,尽管这些结果也表明公共卫生官员在确保公众遵守方面可能面临若干挑战,包括对吸入性炭疽传染性的错误信息;对人群中个人安全的担忧;对政府机构提供足够、安全和有效药物的不信任;以及在收到抗生素药片后对服用的犹豫。总体而言,2001年发生炭疽攻击地区的居民的反应与全国整体情况类似。