The George Institute for Global Health, The University of Sydney, Australia.
The George Institute for Global Health, The University of Sydney, Australia.
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Nov;43(6):1893-1900. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.027. Epub 2011 May 28.
Apart from helmets, little is known about the effectiveness of motorcycle protective clothing in reducing injuries in crashes. The study aimed to quantify the association between usage of motorcycle clothing and injury in crashes.
Cross-sectional analytic study. Crashed motorcyclists (n=212, 71% of identified eligible cases) were recruited through hospitals and motorcycle repair services. Data was obtained through structured face-to-face interviews. The main outcome was hospitalization and motorcycle crash-related injury. Poisson regression was used to estimate relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals for injury adjusting for potential confounders.
Motorcyclists were significantly less likely to be admitted to hospital if they crashed wearing motorcycle jackets (RR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.69-0.91), pants (RR=0.49, 95% CI: 0.25-0.94), or gloves (RR=0.41, 95% CI: 0.26-0.66). When garments included fitted body armour there was a significantly reduced risk of injury to the upper body (RR=0.77, 95% CI: 0.66-0.89), hands and wrists (RR=0.55, 95% CI: 0.38-0.81), legs (RR=0.60, 95% CI: 0.40-0.90), feet and ankles (RR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.35-0.83). Non-motorcycle boots were also associated with a reduced risk of injury compared to shoes or joggers (RR=0.46, 95% CI: 0.28-0.75). No association between use of body armour and risk of fracture injuries was detected. A substantial proportion of motorcycle designed gloves (25.7%), jackets (29.7%) and pants (28.1%) were assessed to have failed due to material damage in the crash.
Motorcycle protective clothing is associated with reduced risk and severity of crash related injury and hospitalization, particularly when fitted with body armour. The proportion of clothing items that failed under crash conditions indicates a need for improved quality control. While mandating usage of protective clothing is not recommended, consideration could be given to providing incentives for usage of protective clothing, such as tax exemptions for safety gear, health insurance premium reductions and rebates.
除了头盔,人们对摩托车防护服在降低事故伤害方面的有效性知之甚少。本研究旨在定量评估摩托车服装的使用与事故中受伤之间的关联。
这是一项横断面分析研究。通过医院和摩托车修理服务招募了 212 名(确定的合格病例中有 71%)事故中的摩托车手。通过结构化的面对面访谈获取数据。主要结局是住院和与摩托车事故相关的伤害。使用泊松回归来估计调整潜在混杂因素后的受伤相对风险(RR)和 95%置信区间。
如果摩托车手在事故中穿着摩托车夹克(RR=0.79,95%CI:0.69-0.91)、裤子(RR=0.49,95%CI:0.25-0.94)或手套(RR=0.41,95%CI:0.26-0.66),他们住院的可能性显著降低。当服装包括合身的身体护甲时,上身(RR=0.77,95%CI:0.66-0.89)、手和手腕(RR=0.55,95%CI:0.38-0.81)、腿部(RR=0.60,95%CI:0.40-0.90)、脚部和脚踝(RR=0.54,95%CI:0.35-0.83)受伤的风险显著降低。与鞋子或慢跑者相比,非摩托车靴与受伤风险降低相关(RR=0.46,95%CI:0.28-0.75)。未发现使用身体护甲与骨折受伤风险之间存在关联。在事故中,相当一部分摩托车设计的手套(25.7%)、夹克(29.7%)和裤子(28.1%)因材料损坏而被评估为失效。
摩托车防护服与降低与事故相关的受伤和住院风险和严重程度相关,尤其是当配备身体护甲时。在事故条件下失效的服装比例表明需要改进质量控制。虽然不建议强制使用防护服,但可以考虑为使用防护服提供激励措施,例如对安全装备免税、降低健康保险费和退款。