Fesi Jeremy D, Yannes Michael P, Brinckman Danielle D, Norcia Anthony M, Ales Justin M, Gilmore Rick O
The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Psychology, 111 Moore Building, University Park, PA 16802, United States.
Vision Res. 2011 Oct 1;51(19):2110-20. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.07.015. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
Motion contrast contributes to the segregation of a two-dimensional figure from its background, yet many questions remain about its neural mechanisms. We measured steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) responses to moving dot displays in which figure regions emerged from and disappeared into the background at a specific temporal frequency (1.2Hz, F1), based on regional differences of dot direction and global direction coherence. The goal was to measure the cortical response function across a range of motion contrast magnitudes. In two experiments using both a low channel count electrode array (Experiment 1) and a high density array (Experiment 2), we observed two distinct phase-locked evoked responses that were similar across motion contrast type. A response at 1.2Hz (1F1) increased in amplitude with increasing magnitudes of direction or coherence contrast. A response at 2.4Hz (2F1) increased in amplitude, but saturated at low levels of direction or coherence contrast. The two components showed different scalp distributions - the 1F1 was strongest along medial occipital channels, while the 2F1 was bilaterally distributed. Taken together, the studies suggest that figures defined by different types of motion contrast are processed by cortical systems with similar dynamics, and that there are separable neural systems devoted to (i) signaling the absolute magnitude of motion contrast and (ii) detecting when a figure defined by motion contrast appears and disappears from view.
运动对比度有助于将二维图形与其背景分离,但关于其神经机制仍存在许多问题。我们测量了对移动点显示的稳态视觉诱发电位(SSVEP)反应,其中图形区域根据点方向的区域差异和全局方向连贯性,以特定时间频率(1.2Hz,F1)从背景中出现并消失于背景中。目的是测量一系列运动对比度幅度下的皮层反应函数。在两个实验中,一个使用低通道数电极阵列(实验1),另一个使用高密度阵列(实验2),我们观察到两种不同的锁相诱发电位反应,它们在运动对比度类型上相似。1.2Hz(1F1)处的反应幅度随着方向或连贯性对比度幅度的增加而增加。2.4Hz(2F1)处的反应幅度增加,但在低水平的方向或连贯性对比度下达到饱和。这两个成分显示出不同的头皮分布——1F1在枕叶内侧通道最强,而2F1双侧分布。综合来看,这些研究表明,由不同类型运动对比度定义的图形由具有相似动力学的皮层系统处理,并且存在可分离的神经系统,分别用于(i)信号运动对比度的绝对幅度,以及(ii)检测由运动对比度定义的图形何时出现在视野中以及何时从视野中消失。