Georgieff Nicolas
Université Lyon 1 and Centre de Neurosciences Cognitives, Lyon, France.
J Physiol Paris. 2011 Dec;105(4-6):207-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2011.07.008. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
The fields of psychoanalysis and neuroscience use different methods of description, analysis and comprehension of reality, and because each is based on a different methodology, each approach constructs a different representation of reality. Thus, psychoanalysis could contribute to a general psychology involving neuroscience to the extent that a "psychoanalytical psychology" (the theory of mental functioning that is extrapolated from psychoanalytical practice) defines natural objects of study (mind functions) for a multidisciplinary approach. However, the so called "naturalisation" of psychoanalytical concepts (metapsychology) does not imply the reduction of these concepts to biology; rather, it suggests a search for compatibility between psychoanalytical concepts and neuroscientific description. Such compatibility would mean the search for common objects that could be described from either a psychoanalytic or a neuroscientific point of view. We suggest that inter-subjectivity, empathy or "co-thinking" processes, from early development to the psychoanalytic relationship or the interaction between the patient and the analyst, could be such a common object for cognitive social neuroscience and psychoanalysis. Together, neuroscience and psychoanalysis could then contribute to a multidisciplinary approach of psychic inter- or co-activity.
精神分析和神经科学领域使用不同的方法来描述、分析和理解现实,并且由于每种方法都基于不同的方法论,所以每种方法构建出的现实表征也不同。因此,精神分析能够为涉及神经科学的一般心理学做出贡献,前提是一种“精神分析心理学”(从精神分析实践中推断出的心理功能理论)为多学科研究方法界定了自然研究对象(心理功能)。然而,精神分析概念(元心理学)的所谓“自然化”并不意味着将这些概念简化为生物学概念;相反,它意味着寻求精神分析概念与神经科学描述之间的兼容性。这种兼容性意味着寻找那些可以从精神分析或神经科学角度进行描述的共同对象。我们认为,从早期发展到精神分析关系或患者与分析师之间的互动,主体间性、同理心或“共同思考”过程可能是认知社会神经科学和精神分析的这样一个共同对象。神经科学和精神分析可以共同为心理互动或共同活动的多学科研究方法做出贡献。