• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A cheap minimally painful and widely usable alternative for retrieving ureteral stents.

作者信息

Söylemez Haluk, Sancaktutar Ahmet Ali, Bozkurt Yaşar, Atar Murat, Penbegül Necmettin, Yildirim Kadir

机构信息

Department of Urology, Medical Faculty, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkey.

出版信息

Urol Int. 2011;87(2):199-204. doi: 10.1159/000327610. Epub 2011 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1159/000327610
PMID:21821994
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe a cheap, minimally painful and widely usable method for retrieving ureteral stents by using an ureteroscope.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Sixty-seven patients with ureteral stents were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomized into a cystoscopic (35 patients) and a ureteroscopic (32 patients) group. All stents were retrieved by a flexible cystoscope in the first group and by a ureteroscope in the second group under local anesthesia. Patients in each group were assessed for stented time, stent side, cause of stent placement, operative time, peroperative pain, postoperative pain, irritative voiding symptoms and hematuria. Also costs of instruments were calculated.

RESULTS

Stents were successfully retrieved in 67 patients. There were no statistical differences in the two groups regarding patient gender and age or stent side, operative time, stented time, mean operative pain score, irritative voiding symptom scores and hematuria. Total selling price was USD 20.399 for flexible instruments and USD 10.516 for rigid ones. Total maintenance price was higher in flexible instruments than in the rigid ones (USD 197.8 and 51.7 per use, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Ureteroscopic stent retrieval is a minimally painful, safe and highly tolerable method under local anesthesia as well as flexible cystoscopic retrieval. Also, it is a cheap and widely usable method.

摘要

相似文献

1
A cheap minimally painful and widely usable alternative for retrieving ureteral stents.
Urol Int. 2011;87(2):199-204. doi: 10.1159/000327610. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
2
A prospective and randomized comparison of rigid ureteroscopic to flexible cystoscopic retrieval of ureteral stents.输尿管支架硬式输尿管镜与软式膀胱镜取出术的前瞻性随机对照研究。
BMC Urol. 2017 Apr 21;17(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0220-8.
3
Ureteroscopic removal of mildly migrated stents using local anesthesia only.仅使用局部麻醉通过输尿管镜取出轻度移位的支架。
J Urol. 2007 Nov;178(5):1998-2001. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.027. Epub 2007 Sep 17.
4
Is ureteral stenting necessary after uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy? A prospective, randomized controlled trial.单纯输尿管镜碎石术后是否需要放置输尿管支架?一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
J Urol. 2002 May;167(5):1977-80.
5
Stent positioning after ureteroscopy for urinary calculi: the question is still open.输尿管镜检查治疗尿路结石后的支架定位:问题仍未解决。
Eur Urol. 2004 Sep;46(3):381-7; discussion 387-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.04.004.
6
Clinical significance of ureteral stent removal by flexible cystoscopy on pain and satisfaction in young males: a prospective randomised control trial.软性膀胱镜下输尿管支架取出术对年轻男性疼痛和满意度的临床意义:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Urolithiasis. 2016 Aug;44(4):367-70. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0833-x. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
7
Ureteral stents: morbidity and impact on quality of life.输尿管支架:发病率及对生活质量的影响。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2005 Aug;7(8):491-4.
8
A prospective randomized trial comparing non-stented versus routine stented ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy.一项比较非支架与常规支架输尿管镜钬激光碎石术的前瞻性随机试验。
Saudi Med J. 2009 Oct;30(10):1276-80.
9
Prospective randomized evaluation of periureteral botulinum toxin type A injection for ureteral stent pain reduction.前瞻性随机评估输尿管周围注射肉毒毒素 A 减少输尿管支架疼痛。
J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):598-602. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.021. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
10
[Feasibility and safety evaluation of retrograde inserting of ureteric catheter via flexible cystoscope].经软性膀胱镜逆行插入输尿管导管的可行性及安全性评估
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Jun 24;88(24):1687-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Transurethral guidewire loop for manipulation and extraction of stent: A novel, innovative, video-endoscopic technique in ureteral stent removal.用于操作和取出支架的经尿道导丝环:输尿管支架取出术中一种新颖、创新的视频内镜技术。
Curr Urol. 2025 Mar;19(2):117-124. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000170. Epub 2025 Jan 18.
2
Feasibility and safety of magnetic-end double-J ureteral stent insertion and removal in children.经肛门内镜微创手术治疗儿童直肠阴道瘘的疗效观察
World J Urol. 2021 May;39(5):1649-1655. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03339-0. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
3
A prospective and randomized comparison of rigid ureteroscopic to flexible cystoscopic retrieval of ureteral stents.
输尿管支架硬式输尿管镜与软式膀胱镜取出术的前瞻性随机对照研究。
BMC Urol. 2017 Apr 21;17(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0220-8.
4
First clinical evaluation of a new single-use flexible cystoscope dedicated to double-J stent removal (Isiris™): a European prospective multicenter study.新型一次性使用软性膀胱镜(Isiris™)专门用于双 J 支架取出的首次临床评估:一项欧洲前瞻性多中心研究。
World J Urol. 2017 Aug;35(8):1269-1275. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1986-0. Epub 2016 Dec 17.
5
Rethinking of ureteral stent removal using an extraction string; what patients feel and what is patients' preference? : a randomized controlled study.使用取出线进行输尿管支架取出的再思考:患者的感受及偏好是什么?一项随机对照研究。
BMC Urol. 2015 Dec 9;15:121. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0114-6.
6
Comparison of complications and short term results of conventional technique versus new technique during graft ureteral stent insertion in bari technique at Emam Khomeini Hospital, Urmia.在乌尔米亚伊玛目霍梅尼医院采用巴里技术进行移植输尿管支架置入时,传统技术与新技术的并发症及短期结果比较
Glob J Health Sci. 2014 Sep 18;6(7 Spec No):31-7. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v6n7p31.
7
Urinary tract obstruction: Optimizing removal of ureteral stents.尿路梗阻:优化输尿管支架取出术
Nat Rev Urol. 2011 Oct 10;8(10):530. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2011.133.