Suppr超能文献

行人与 SUV/工作实用车辆和轿车碰撞模拟中的头部撞击严重程度分析。

An analysis of head impact severity in simulations of collisions between pedestrians and SUVs/work utility vehicles, and sedans.

机构信息

Centre for Automotive Safety Research, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2011 Aug;12(4):388-97. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.580473.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the determinants of the severity of the head kinematics of a pedestrian when struck by common sport utility vehicles (SUV) and work utility vehicles (WUVs) to assess how effective assessment protocols are in assessing injury risk for SUVs and work utilities.

METHODS

Three hundred twenty-four simulations of pedestrian collisions with SUVs, work utility vehicles, and sedans were performed using several vehicle geometries, pedestrian orientations, speeds, and braking levels. Contact stiffnesses in the models were based on impact test results with exemplar vehicle structures. A single contact characteristic was used for all head-to-hood contacts to allow the effects of other factors on head injury risk to be compared. Simulations of standard headform tests on the same hood characterized the structure from a subsystem test perspective.

RESULTS

Head injury criterion values were higher in SUV/WUV simulations than sedan simulations because of high neck tension rather than through higher contact forces with the hood. In fact, the severity of the impact between the head and hood was slightly less in SUV/WUV simulations. Sedan and SUV/WUV simulations produced lower head injury criterion (HIC) values than did the subsystem tests.

CONCLUSIONS

High bonnet leading edges led to increased neck loads in these simulations of pedestrian collisions. Neck loads were influential on head injury risk in the SUV/work utility simulations but not in sedan simulations. Subsystem impact tests may overestimate head impact risk from the hood itself but fail to capture a potentially important injury mechanism in collisions with vehicles with high leading edges and thus fail to differentiate completely risks posed by such vehicles. These results may have implications for the interpretation of pedestrian subsystem test results: a given HIC value in an SUV/WUV test may represent a relatively higher risk of injury than the same results recorded in a sedan test.

摘要

目的

描述行人被普通运动型多用途车(SUV)和工作型多用途车(WUV)撞击时头部运动学严重程度的决定因素,以评估评估协议在评估 SUV 和工作效用的伤害风险方面的有效性。

方法

使用几种车辆几何形状、行人方向、速度和制动水平,对行人与 SUV、工作车和轿车碰撞进行了 324 次模拟。模型中的接触刚度基于具有代表性车辆结构的冲击测试结果。为了允许比较其他因素对头部受伤风险的影响,所有头部与发动机罩的接触都使用单一接触特性。对同一发动机罩上的标准头部冲击试验进行了模拟,从子系统测试的角度描述了结构。

结果

由于颈部张力较高,而不是与发动机罩的接触力较高,SUV/WUV 模拟中的头部损伤准则值高于轿车模拟中的值。实际上,SUV/WUV 模拟中的头部与发动机罩之间的冲击严重程度略低。与子系统测试相比,轿车和 SUV/WUV 模拟产生的头部损伤准则(HIC)值较低。

结论

这些行人碰撞模拟中,较高的发动机罩前缘导致颈部负荷增加。颈部负荷对 SUV/工作车模拟中的头部受伤风险有影响,但对轿车模拟没有影响。子系统冲击试验可能高估了来自发动机罩本身的头部冲击风险,但未能捕捉到与具有较高前缘的车辆碰撞时的潜在重要受伤机制,因此无法完全区分此类车辆带来的风险。这些结果可能对行人子系统测试结果的解释产生影响:在 SUV/WUV 测试中记录的给定 HIC 值可能代表比在轿车测试中记录的相同 HIC 值更高的受伤风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验