• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级保健认可信和患者传单以提高结直肠癌筛查参与率:一项两因素随机试验的结果。

Primary care endorsement letter and a patient leaflet to improve participation in colorectal cancer screening: results of a factorial randomised trial.

机构信息

Department of Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, Old Road, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2011 Aug 9;105(4):475-80. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.255.

DOI:10.1038/bjc.2011.255
PMID:21829202
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3170960/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The trial aimed to investigate whether a general practitioner's (GP) letter encouraging participation and a more explicit leaflet explaining how to complete faecal occult blood test (FOBT) included with the England Bowel Cancer Screening Programme invitation materials would improve uptake.

METHODS

A randomised controlled 2 × 2 factorial trial was conducted in the south of England. Overall, 1288 patients registered with 20 GPs invited for screening in October 2009 participated in the trial. Participants were randomised to either a GP's endorsement letter and/or an enhanced information leaflet with their FOBT kit. The primary outcome was verified with return of the test kit within 20 weeks.

RESULTS

Both the GP's endorsement letter and the enhanced procedural leaflet, each increased participation by ∼6% - the GP's letter by 5.8% (95% CI: 4.1-7.8%) and the leaflet by 6.0% (95% CI: 4.3-8.1%). On the basis of the intention-to-treat analysis, the random effects logistic regression model confirmed that there was no important interaction between the two interventions, and estimated an adjusted rate ratio of 1.11 (P=0.038) for the GP's letter and 1.12 (P=0.029) for the leaflet. In the absence of an interaction, an additive effect for receiving both the GP's letter and leaflet (11.8%, 95% CI: 8.5-16%) was confirmed. The per-protocol analysis indicated that the insertion of an electronic GP's signature on the endorsement letter was associated with increased participation (P=0.039).

CONCLUSION

Including both an endorsement letter from each patient's GP and a more explicit procedural leaflet could increase participation in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme by ∼10%, a relative improvement of 20% on current performance.

摘要

背景

本试验旨在研究家庭医生(GP)鼓励参与的信函和随英格兰结直肠癌筛查计划邀请材料一并提供的更详细粪便潜血检测(FOBT)说明手册是否会提高参与率。

方法

在英格兰南部进行了一项随机对照 2×2 析因试验。2009 年 10 月,共邀请 20 名全科医生注册的 1288 名患者参与了该试验。参与者随机分为接受 GP 推荐信和/或随 FOBT 试剂盒提供的增强信息手册。主要结局是在 20 周内返回检测试剂盒来验证。

结果

GP 的推荐信和增强的程序手册都使参与率提高了约 6%——GP 的推荐信提高了 5.8%(95%CI:4.1-7.8%),手册提高了 6.0%(95%CI:4.3-8.1%)。基于意向治疗分析,随机效应逻辑回归模型证实两种干预措施之间没有重要的相互作用,并估计 GP 推荐信的调整后比值比为 1.11(P=0.038),手册为 1.12(P=0.029)。在没有相互作用的情况下,确认同时收到 GP 的推荐信和手册的附加效果为 11.8%(95%CI:8.5-16%)。方案分析表明,在推荐信上插入电子 GP 签名与参与率增加相关(P=0.039)。

结论

同时包括每位患者的 GP 的推荐信和更明确的程序手册,可能会使英格兰结直肠癌筛查计划的参与率提高约 10%,相对于当前的表现提高 20%。

相似文献

1
Primary care endorsement letter and a patient leaflet to improve participation in colorectal cancer screening: results of a factorial randomised trial.初级保健认可信和患者传单以提高结直肠癌筛查参与率:一项两因素随机试验的结果。
Br J Cancer. 2011 Aug 9;105(4):475-80. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.255.
2
Evaluating the effectiveness of GP endorsement on increasing participation in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.评估全科医生背书对提高英格兰国民保健署结直肠癌筛查计划参与率的有效性:一项随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2012 Feb 20;13:18. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-18.
3
Effects of evidence-based strategies to reduce the socioeconomic gradient of uptake in the English NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (ASCEND): four cluster-randomised controlled trials.基于证据的策略对降低英国国民健康服务体系肠癌筛查项目(ASCEND)中社会经济摄取梯度的影响:四项整群随机对照试验
Lancet. 2016 Feb 20;387(10020):751-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01154-X. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
4
Including a general practice endorsement letter with the testing kit in the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: Results of a cluster randomised trial.将一般实践认可函纳入大肠癌筛查计划的检测包中:一项群组随机试验的结果。
J Med Screen. 2021 Dec;28(4):419-425. doi: 10.1177/0969141321997480. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
5
Comparison of mailed invitation strategies to improve fecal occult blood test participation in men: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.邮寄邀请策略对提高男性粪便潜血试验参与率的比较:一项随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2013 Jul 31;14:239. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-239.
6
Participation in screening for colorectal cancer based on a faecal occult blood test is improved by endorsement by the primary care practitioner.初级保健医生的认可可提高基于粪便潜血试验的结直肠癌筛查参与率。
J Med Screen. 2002;9(4):147-52. doi: 10.1136/jms.9.4.147.
7
Reducing the socioeconomic gradient in uptake of the NHS bowel cancer screening Programme using a simplified supplementary information leaflet: a cluster-randomised trial.采用简化补充信息传单降低 NHS 肠癌筛查计划的社会经济梯度参与率:一项聚类随机试验。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Aug 14;17(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3512-1.
8
Tailored telephone counselling to increase participation of underusers in a population-based colorectal cancer-screening programme with faecal occult blood test: A randomized controlled trial.量身定制的电话咨询,以提高粪便潜血试验人群结直肠癌筛查计划中未充分使用者的参与度:一项随机对照试验。
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2017 Feb;65(1):17-28. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2016.06.336. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
9
GP participation in increasing uptake in a national bowel cancer screening programme: the PEARL project.全科医生参与提高全国肠癌筛查项目的参与率:PEARL项目
Br J Cancer. 2017 Jun 6;116(12):1551-1557. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.129. Epub 2017 May 18.
10
Alerts in electronic medical records to promote a colorectal cancer screening programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care.电子病历中的警报以促进结直肠癌筛查计划:一项初级保健中的整群随机对照试验
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Jul;66(648):e483-90. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X685657. Epub 2016 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Medicine Preferences of Older Adults: The Role of Messaging in a Multi-Methods Experimental Survey.了解老年人的医学偏好:多方法实验性调查中信息传递的作用。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70366. doi: 10.1111/hex.70366.
2
Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial (YLST) pathway navigation study: a protocol for a nested randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effect of a pathway navigation intervention on lung cancer screening uptake.约克郡肺癌筛查试验(YLST)路径导航研究:一项嵌套随机对照试验方案,旨在评估路径导航干预对肺癌筛查参与度的影响。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 9;14(7):e084577. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084577.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of repeated invitations on uptake of colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood testing: analysis of prevalence and incidence screening.重复邀请对粪便潜血检测筛查结直肠癌的影响:患病率和发病率筛查分析。
BMJ. 2010 Oct 27;341:c5531. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5531.
2
Endorsement by the primary care practitioner consistently improves participation in screening for colorectal cancer: a longitudinal analysis.初级保健医生的认可一致提高了结直肠癌筛查的参与率:一项纵向分析。
J Med Screen. 2010;17(1):19-24. doi: 10.1258/jms.2010.009101.
3
Design of surgical randomized controlled trials involving multiple interventions.
Co-designing a recruitment strategy for lung cancer screening in high-risk individuals: protocol for a mixed-methods study.
共同设计高危个体肺癌筛查的招募策略:一项混合方法研究的方案
HRB Open Res. 2023 Nov 13;6:64. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13793.1. eCollection 2023.
4
SMARTERscreen protocol: a three-arm cluster randomised controlled trial of patient SMS messaging in general practice to increase participation in the Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program.SMARTERscreen 方案:在一般实践中对患者发送短信以增加参与澳大利亚国家结直肠癌筛查计划的三臂群组随机对照试验。
Trials. 2023 Nov 13;24(1):723. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07756-5.
5
Optimising recruitment to a lung cancer screening trial: A comparison of general practitioner and community-based recruitment.优化肺癌筛查试验的招募工作:全科医生与社区招募方式的比较
J Med Screen. 2024 Mar;31(1):46-52. doi: 10.1177/09691413231190785. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
6
Barriers and facilitators of vaccine hesitancy for COVID-19, influenza, and pertussis during pregnancy and in mothers of infants under two years: An umbrella review.COVID-19、流感和百白破疫苗接种犹豫的障碍和促进因素:孕期和两岁以下婴儿母亲的伞式综述。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 2;18(3):e0282525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282525. eCollection 2023.
7
Colorectal cancer screening barriers and facilitators among Jordanians: A cross-sectional study.约旦人结直肠癌筛查的障碍与促进因素:一项横断面研究。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Feb 13;32:102149. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102149. eCollection 2023 Apr.
8
Patients' Expectations and Preferences for the Organizational Conditions of the Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme in Poland: A Qualitative Analysis.波兰结直肠癌筛查项目组织条件的患者期望与偏好:一项定性分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 28;11(3):371. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030371.
9
Predicting attitudes towards screening for neurodegenerative diseases using OCT and artificial intelligence: Findings from a literature review.利用光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和人工智能预测对神经退行性疾病筛查的态度:文献综述结果
J Public Health Res. 2022 Oct 20;11(4):22799036221127627. doi: 10.1177/22799036221127627. eCollection 2022 Oct.
10
The SMARTscreen Trial: a randomised controlled trial investigating the efficacy of a GP-endorsed narrative SMS to increase participation in the Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program.SMARTscreen 试验:一项随机对照试验,旨在调查经全科医生认可的叙事短信增加参与澳大利亚国家结直肠癌筛查计划的效果。
Trials. 2022 Jan 12;23(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05877-3.
涉及多种干预措施的外科随机对照试验设计。
J Surg Res. 2011 Jan;165(1):118-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.09.054. Epub 2009 Oct 30.
4
Inequalities in colorectal cancer screening participation in the first round of the national screening programme in England.英格兰全国筛查计划首轮中结直肠癌筛查参与的不平等现象。
Br J Cancer. 2009 Dec 3;101 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S60-3. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605392.
5
Comparing different strategies for colorectal cancer screening in Italy: predictors of patients' participation.比较意大利不同结直肠癌筛查策略:患者参与的预测因素。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jan;105(1):188-98. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.583. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
6
Physicians encouraging colorectal screening: a randomized controlled trial of enhanced office and patient management on compliance with colorectal cancer screening.医生鼓励进行结直肠癌筛查:一项关于强化诊室及患者管理对结直肠癌筛查依从性影响的随机对照试验。
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Jan 12;169(1):47-55. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.519.
7
Predicting the impact of the screening programme for colorectal cancer in the UK.预测英国结直肠癌筛查计划的影响。
J Med Screen. 2008;15(4):163-74. doi: 10.1258/jms.2008.008024.
8
Public perceptions of communicating information about bowel cancer screening.公众对传播肠癌筛查信息的看法。
Health Expect. 2008 Mar;11(1):16-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00474.x.
9
The UK colorectal cancer screening pilot: results of the second round of screening in England.英国结直肠癌筛查试点项目:英格兰第二轮筛查结果
Br J Cancer. 2007 Dec 17;97(12):1601-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604089. Epub 2007 Nov 20.
10
The influence of health literacy on colorectal cancer screening knowledge, beliefs and behavior.健康素养对结直肠癌筛查知识、信念和行为的影响。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2007 Oct;99(10):1105-12.