Suppr超能文献

腰痛管理的循证实践指南:对物理治疗的启示

Evidence based practice guidelines for management of low back pain: physical therapy implications.

作者信息

Ladeira Carlos E

机构信息

Physical Therapy Program, College of Allied Health and Sciences, Nova Southeastern University, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33328, USA.

出版信息

Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011 May-Jun;15(3):190-9. doi: 10.1590/s1413-35552011000300004.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) is the most common disorder seen in physical therapy practice. There are several hundred clinical trials on the management of LBP. To summarize these trials, researchers wrote Evidence Based Practice (EBP) guidelines. This article reviewed the implications of EBP guidelines recommendations for physical therapy practice.

OBJECTIVES

To review the recommendations for conservative management of LBP published in EBP guidelines since 2002.

METHODS

Searches were performed on the following databases: Google web searching engine, Medline, Cochrane Library, and the Guideline Clearing House. Guidelines published in English and addressing conservative management of LBP were included.

RESULTS

Thirteen multidisciplinary and three mono-disciplinary guidelines met the inclusion criteria. LBP was triaged into three groups: with red flags, with radiculopathy, or non-specific. Patients without red flags could be safely managed without specialist referral. Patient education was recommended for all patients with LBP. There was an agreement to advise spine manipulation for patients with acute and sub-acute non-specific LBP. There was a consensus to recommend exercises for acute, sub-acute, and chronic LBP. Few guidelines addressed conservative management of LBP with radiculopathy. Overall, the guidelines did not offer specific advice for manipulation (hypomobility or instability) and exercise (stabilization or directional preference).

CONCLUSION

Multidisciplinary guidelines focused on primary care and lacked details significant for physical therapy practice. There is a need for mono-disciplinary physical therapy guidelines to improve the balance between evidence and professional relevance.

摘要

背景

腰痛(LBP)是物理治疗实践中最常见的病症。关于腰痛管理的临床试验有数百项。为了总结这些试验,研究人员撰写了循证实践(EBP)指南。本文回顾了EBP指南建议对物理治疗实践的影响。

目的

回顾自2002年以来EBP指南中发表的关于腰痛保守治疗的建议。

方法

在以下数据库进行检索:谷歌网络搜索引擎、医学文献数据库、考克兰图书馆和指南清除中心。纳入以英文发表且涉及腰痛保守治疗的指南。

结果

13项多学科指南和3项单学科指南符合纳入标准。腰痛被分为三组:有警示信号、有神经根病或非特异性。没有警示信号的患者无需专科转诊即可安全管理。建议对所有腰痛患者进行患者教育。对于急性和亚急性非特异性腰痛患者,建议进行脊柱推拿,这一点达成了共识。对于急性、亚急性和慢性腰痛,建议进行锻炼,这也达成了共识。很少有指南涉及神经根病性腰痛的保守治疗。总体而言,这些指南没有提供关于推拿(活动度降低或不稳定)和锻炼(稳定或方向偏好)的具体建议。

结论

多学科指南侧重于初级保健,缺乏对物理治疗实践具有重要意义的细节。需要单学科物理治疗指南来改善证据与专业相关性之间的平衡。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验