Department of Preventive Medicine & Biometrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2012;19(1):37-46. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2011.603147. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
The purpose of this study was to increase our understanding of traffic safety culture (TSC) by identifying its constituent components. A review of existing safety culture literature was conducted. Next, 18 international experts participated in a Delphi Technique to rate candidate TSC components. Corresponding survey items were then developed and pretested. Our final survey instrument was mailed to a representative sample of 1700 US households. Their data were used to conduct a factor analysis that yielded a 15 factor structure. The factors that explained the most variance in TSC were support for increased government attention to traffic safety, strict monitoring and control of alcohol-impaired drivers, disapproval of speeding, and avoidance of aggressive driving. Other factors included local engagement, desire for government and private sector accountability, more information, school involvement, teen restrictions, willingness to invest and seatbelt use. This work represents a first attempt to operationalise TSC. Future research will be needed to refine and extend the tentative structure that has been identified. Valid and reliable measurement of this construct should facilitate traffic safety advocates' efforts to overcome the social challenges they face.
本研究旨在通过识别交通安全文化(TSC)的构成要素来加深对其的理解。对现有安全文化文献进行了回顾。接下来,18 名国际专家参与了德尔菲技术,对 TSC 候选组成部分进行了评分。然后制定了相应的调查项目并进行了预测试。我们的最终调查工具寄给了 1700 户美国家庭的代表性样本。他们的数据用于进行因子分析,得出了 15 个因子结构。解释 TSC 最大差异的因素是支持增加政府对交通安全的关注、严格监控和控制酒后驾车者、不赞成超速驾驶以及避免攻击性驾驶。其他因素包括地方参与度、对政府和私营部门问责制的期望、更多信息、学校参与、青少年限制、投资意愿和安全带使用。这项工作代表了将 TSC 付诸实践的首次尝试。未来的研究将需要对已确定的暂定结构进行细化和扩展。该结构的有效和可靠测量应有助于交通安全倡导者克服他们所面临的社会挑战。