• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国药品最高限价设定方法:某些情况下所需数据更少。

The German method for setting ceiling prices for drugs: in some cases less data are required.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011 Aug;11(4):403-9. doi: 10.1586/erp.11.45.

DOI:10.1586/erp.11.45
PMID:21831020
Abstract

The Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care in Germany makes recommendations for ceiling prices of drugs based on an evaluation of the relationship between costs and effects in each therapeutic area. The analysis requires, when applicable, calculation of savings from avoided clinical events and increased future health expenditures from prolonging life (i.e., downstream costs). This article suggests that because of the specific requirements of the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, in some cases calculation of downstream costs is not necessary when clinical outcomes are used as a measure of effectiveness. In this article, we identify these conditions. If they hold, it will reduce data requirements, the costs and time required to conduct evaluations, and the uncertainty in the analysis.

摘要

德国卫生保健质量和效率研究所(Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care in Germany)根据对每个治疗领域的成本与效果关系的评估,为药品设定最高限价。分析需要时,还需要计算避免临床事件所节省的费用以及因延长寿命而增加的未来健康支出(即下游成本)。本文提出,由于德国卫生保健质量和效率研究所的特殊要求,在将临床结果作为疗效衡量标准的情况下,并非在所有情况下都需要计算下游成本。本文确定了这些条件。如果这些条件成立,将减少数据分析要求、评估所需的成本和时间,以及分析的不确定性。

相似文献

1
The German method for setting ceiling prices for drugs: in some cases less data are required.德国药品最高限价设定方法:某些情况下所需数据更少。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011 Aug;11(4):403-9. doi: 10.1586/erp.11.45.
2
Germany's decision rule for setting ceiling prices of drugs: a comparative analysis with other decision rules.德国药品定价上限设定决策规则:与其他决策规则的比较分析。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011 Mar 1;9(2):65-71. doi: 10.2165/11586640-000000000-00000.
3
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
4
[Relevance of pharmacoeconomic analyses to price and reimbursement decisions in Austria].[药物经济学分析与奥地利药品定价及报销决策的相关性]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2006 Dec;156(23-24):612-8. doi: 10.1007/s10354-006-0357-7.
5
[Cost-effectiveness of new drugs impacts reimbursement decision making but room for improvement].新药的成本效益影响报销决策,但仍有改进空间。
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;154:A958.
6
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
7
Belgian methodological guidelines for pharmacoeconomic evaluations: toward standardization of drug reimbursement requests.比利时药物经济学评价方法指南:迈向药品报销申请的标准化
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):441-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00469.x. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
8
[Comments by the Working Group for Methods of Economic Evaluation in Health Care (AG MEG) to IQWiG's Draft Guidelines "Methods for Assessment of the Relation of Benefits to Costs in the German Statutory Health Care System"].[医疗保健经济评估方法工作组(AG MEG)对IQWiG《德国法定医疗保健系统中效益与成本关系评估方法》指南草案的评论]
Gesundheitswesen. 2008 Jun;70(6):e1-16. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1077059.
9
[Drug utilization and pharmaceutical cost-containment in germany-perspectives 1 year after enactment of the GMG].[德国的药物利用与药品成本控制——《德国药品法》颁布一年后的情况]
Med Klin (Munich). 2005 Jun 15;100(6):314-24. doi: 10.1007/s00063-005-1040-2.
10
Determining the price for pharmaceuticals in Germany: comparing a shortcut for IQWiG's efficiency frontier method with the price set by the manufacturer for ticagrelor.确定德国药品价格:比较 IQWiG 效率前沿方法的快捷方式与替格瑞洛制造商设定的价格。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Feb;14(1):123-9. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2014.868313. Epub 2013 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
A proportional rule for setting reimbursement prices of new drugs and its mathematical consistency.新药定价的比例规则及其数学一致性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 23;20(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5055-4.
2
Comment on: "Healthy Decisions: Towards Uncertainty Tolerance in Healthcare Policy".评论:《健康决策:迈向医疗保健政策中的不确定性容忍度》
Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Sep;33(9):981-2. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0317-4.
3
Comment on: "Are current cost-effectiveness thresholds for low- and middle-income countries useful? Examples from the world of vaccines".
关于《中低收入国家当前的成本效益阈值是否有用?疫苗领域的实例》的评论
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Dec;32(12):1245-6. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0221-3.
4
Reference pricing and price negotiations for innovative new drugs : viable policies in the long term?创新新药的参考定价与价格谈判:从长期来看是可行的政策吗?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Jan;31(1):11-4. doi: 10.1007/s40273-012-0002-9.
5
Presenting Germany's drug pricing rule as a cost-per-QALY rule.将德国的药品定价规则表述为每质量调整生命年成本规则。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2012 Jun;15(2):103-7. doi: 10.1007/s10729-011-9186-3. Epub 2011 Dec 21.