Louisiana State University, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011 Mar 1;9(2):65-71. doi: 10.2165/11586640-000000000-00000.
In Germany, the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) makes recommendations for ceiling prices of drugs based on an evaluation of the relationship between costs and effectiveness. To set ceiling prices, IQWiG uses the following decision rule: the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of a new drug compared with the next effective intervention should not be higher than that of the next effective intervention compared with its comparator. The purpose of this article is to analyse ethical implications of IQWiG's rule and compare them with those of two alternative decision rules, one that is based on an absolute cost-effectiveness threshold and one that falls in between. To this end, constrained optimization problems are defined that yield each decision rule. This article shows that IQWiG's rule accounts for severity of disease and past resource consumption. Potential problems and pitfalls are discussed.
在德国,医疗质量和效率研究所(IQWiG)根据成本效益关系的评估,为药品的最高限价提出建议。为了设定最高限价,IQWiG 使用以下决策规则:与下一种有效干预措施相比,新药的增量成本效益比(ICER)不应高于下一种有效干预措施与其比较药物相比的 ICER。本文的目的是分析 IQWiG 规则的伦理含义,并将其与另外两种替代决策规则进行比较,一种基于绝对成本效益阈值,另一种介于两者之间。为此,定义了产生每个决策规则的约束优化问题。本文表明,IQWiG 的规则考虑了疾病的严重程度和过去的资源消耗。讨论了潜在的问题和陷阱。