• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

局部晚期不可切除 IV 期头颈部鳞癌加速放疗联合高剂量化疗:GORTEC 随机试验结果。

Accelerated radiotherapy and concomitant high dose chemotherapy in non resectable stage IV locally advanced HNSCC: results of a GORTEC randomized trial.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

出版信息

Radiother Oncol. 2011 Jul;100(1):56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.07.006. Epub 2011 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2011.07.006
PMID:21831465
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of a strong increase of the dose-intensity of concomitant radio-chemotherapy (RT-CT) in patients with far advanced non metastatic HNSCC.

METHODS

Eligible patients had N3 disease (UICC 1997) and the primary tumor and/or the node(s) had to be strictly unresectable. Patients with palpable N2B-C were also eligible if massive nodal involvement was present. 109 patients were included, with 53 randomized to RT-CT and 56 to accelerated RT. In the RT-CT arm, the RT regimen consisted of 64Gy in 5weeks and the CT regimen consisted of synchronous CDDP 100mg/m(2) on days 2, 16, and 30 and 5FU 1000mg/m(2) on days1-5 and 29-33 of the RT course. After RT-CT, two adjuvant cycles of CDDP-5FU were delivered in good responders. A control arm was using a very accelerated RT, delivering 64Gy in 3weeks.

RESULTS

The most common tumor sites were oropharynx and hypopharynx. Most of the patients had T4 disease (70%) and 100% had a massive nodal involvement (mainly N3 with a mean nodal size >7cm in both arms). A significant difference was observed in favor of the RT-CT arm (p=0.005) in terms of cumulative incidence of local regional failure or distant metastases. However, the overall survival and event free survival rates were not significantly different between the two arms (p=0.70 and 0.16, respectively). The lack of survival benefit in favor of the RT-CT was partly due to an excess of initial early treatment related death in the RT-CT arm.

CONCLUSION

The very intense RT-CT schedule was more efficient on disease control, but was also more toxic than accelerated RT alone, pointing out that there was no clear improvement of the therapeutic index. This study shows the limits of dose-intensification, with regard to concomitant RT-CT.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估在局部晚期、无远处转移的头颈部鳞癌(HNSCC)患者中,强烈增加同期放化疗(RT-CT)剂量强度的疗效。

方法

符合条件的患者为 N3 期(UICC 1997),且原发肿瘤和/或淋巴结必须严格不可切除。如果存在大量淋巴结受累,可包括触诊 N2B-C 的患者。共纳入 109 例患者,53 例随机分配至 RT-CT 组,56 例分配至加速 RT 组。在 RT-CT 组中,RT 方案为 5 周内给予 64Gy,CT 方案为第 2、16 和 30 天给予顺铂 100mg/m²,第 1-5 和 29-33 天给予氟尿嘧啶 1000mg/m²;在 RT-CT 后,对反应良好的患者给予两个周期的顺铂-氟尿嘧啶辅助化疗。对照组采用非常加速 RT,3 周内给予 64Gy。

结果

最常见的肿瘤部位为口咽和下咽。大多数患者为 T4 期(70%),100%患者存在大量淋巴结受累(主要为 N3,在两个组中淋巴结平均大小均>7cm)。与加速 RT 组相比,RT-CT 组在局部区域复发或远处转移的累积发生率方面具有显著优势(p=0.005)。然而,两组之间的总生存和无事件生存率无显著差异(p=0.70 和 0.16)。RT-CT 组无生存获益部分归因于 RT-CT 组初始治疗相关死亡过多。

结论

与单独加速 RT 相比,强烈的同期放化疗方案在疾病控制方面更有效,但毒性也更大,这表明治疗指数没有明显改善。本研究表明,同期放化疗的剂量强度存在局限性。

相似文献

1
Accelerated radiotherapy and concomitant high dose chemotherapy in non resectable stage IV locally advanced HNSCC: results of a GORTEC randomized trial.局部晚期不可切除 IV 期头颈部鳞癌加速放疗联合高剂量化疗:GORTEC 随机试验结果。
Radiother Oncol. 2011 Jul;100(1):56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.07.006. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
2
Very accelerated radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy for N3 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Pooled analysis of two GORTEC randomized trials.非常加速放疗或同期放化疗治疗 N3 期头颈部鳞状细胞癌:两项 GORTEC 随机试验的汇总分析。
Oral Oncol. 2017 Aug;71:61-66. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
3
Cetuximab and Radiotherapy Versus Cisplatin and Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: A Randomized Phase II Trial.西妥昔单抗联合放疗对比顺铂联合放疗治疗局部晚期头颈部鳞癌:一项随机 II 期试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 10;34(5):427-35. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.1671. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
4
Concomitant radiochemotherapy or accelerated radiotherapy: analysis of two randomized trials of the French Head and Neck Cancer Group (GORTEC).同步放化疗或加速放疗:法国头颈癌研究组(GORTEC)两项随机试验的分析
Semin Oncol. 2004 Dec;31(6):822-6. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2004.09.002.
5
A phase 2 randomized study to compare short course palliative radiotherapy with short course concurrent palliative chemotherapy plus radiotherapy in advanced and unresectable head and neck cancer.一项2期随机研究,比较短程姑息性放疗与短程同步姑息性化疗加放疗在晚期不可切除头颈癌中的疗效。
Radiother Oncol. 2015 Oct;117(1):145-51. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.07.026. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
6
Randomized trial comparing surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced, nonmetastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: 10-year update and subset analysis.随机对照试验比较手术和辅助放疗与同期放化疗治疗晚期局部非转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者:10 年更新和亚组分析。
Cancer. 2015 May 15;121(10):1599-607. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29251. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
7
Evolution of treatment and high-risk features in resectable locally advanced Head and Neck squamous cell carcinoma with special reference to extracapsular extension of nodal disease.可切除局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌治疗及高危特征的演变,特别提及淋巴结包膜外侵犯
J BUON. 2015 Jul-Aug;20(4):943-53.
8
Concomitant chemoradiotherapy versus altered fractionation radiotherapy in the radiotherapeutic management of locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: An adjusted indirect comparison meta-analysis.同步放化疗与超分割放疗在局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌放射治疗管理中的比较:一项校正间接比较的荟萃分析。
Head Neck. 2015 May;37(5):670-6. doi: 10.1002/hed.23661. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
9
Results of an RTOG phase III trial (RTOG 85-27) comparing radiotherapy plus etanidazole with radiotherapy alone for locally advanced head and neck carcinomas.一项RTOG III期试验(RTOG 85-27)的结果,该试验比较了放疗联合乙硝唑与单纯放疗用于局部晚期头颈癌的疗效。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Jun 15;32(3):567-76. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00150-W.
10
Phase III randomized trial of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus preoperative radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者术前同步放化疗与术前放疗的III期随机试验
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 4;8(27):44842-44850. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15107.

引用本文的文献

1
A randomized prospective study comparing acute toxicity, compliance and objective response rate between simultaneous integrated boost and sequential intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer.一项比较同步整合加量放疗与序贯调强放疗治疗局部晚期头颈癌的急性毒性、依从性和客观缓解率的随机前瞻性研究。
Radiat Oncol J. 2021 Mar;39(1):15-23. doi: 10.3857/roj.2020.01018. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
2
Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): An update on 107 randomized trials and 19,805 patients, on behalf of MACH-NC Group.头颈部癌症化疗的荟萃分析(MACH-NC):代表 MACH-NC 小组,对 107 项随机试验和 19805 名患者的最新更新。
Radiother Oncol. 2021 Mar;156:281-293. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.01.013. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
3
Therapeutic Intensification and Induction Chemotherapy for High-Risk Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma.高危局部进展期鳞状细胞癌的强化治疗和诱导化疗。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2019 Jan 11;20(2):2. doi: 10.1007/s11864-019-0599-4.
4
Altered fractionation radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer: a network meta-analysis.头颈部癌治疗中采用或不采用化疗的分割放疗改变:一项网状荟萃分析
Onco Targets Ther. 2018 Sep 4;11:5465-5483. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S172018. eCollection 2018.
5
Supportive Management of Mucositis and Metabolic Derangements in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.头颈部癌症患者黏膜炎和代谢紊乱的支持性管理
Cancers (Basel). 2015 Sep 3;7(3):1743-57. doi: 10.3390/cancers7030862.
6
A traditional Japanese medicine--Hangeshashinto (TJ-14)--alleviates chemoradiation-induced mucositis and improves rates of treatment completion.一种传统日本药物——半夏泻心汤(TJ-14)——可减轻放化疗引起的粘膜炎并提高治疗完成率。
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jan;23(1):29-35. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2315-z. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
7
Radiation therapy is well tolerated and produces excellent control rates in elderly patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers.放射治疗耐受性良好,对于局部晚期头颈癌老年患者可产生极佳的控制率。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2012 Oct;3(4). doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2012.05.001.