• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脱除个人防护装备过程中,单层与双层手套对病毒转移至医护人员皮肤和衣物的影响。

Effect of single- versus double-gloving on virus transfer to health care workers' skin and clothing during removal of personal protective equipment.

机构信息

Institute of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2012 May;40(4):369-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.04.324. Epub 2011 Aug 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2011.04.324
PMID:21831480
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7115263/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The removal of personal protective equipment (PPE) after patient care may result in transfer of virus to hands and clothing of health care workers (HCWs). The risk of transfer can be modeled using harmless viruses to obtain quantitative data. To determine whether double-gloving reduces virus transfer to HCWs' hands and clothing during removal of contaminated PPE, we conducted a human challenge study using bacteriophages to compare the frequency and quantity of virus transfer to hands and clothes during PPE removal with single-gloving and double-gloving technique.

METHODS

Each experiment had a double-gloving phase and a single-gloving phase. Participants donned PPE (ie, contact isolation gown, N95 respirator, eye protection, latex gloves). The gown, respirator, eye protection, and dominant glove were contaminated with bacteriophage. Participants then removed the PPE, and their hands, face, and scrubs were sampled for virus.

RESULTS

Transfer of virus to hands during PPE removal was significantly more frequent with single-gloving than with double-gloving. Transfer to scrubs was similar during single-gloving and double-gloving. The amount of virus transfer to hands ranged from 0.15 to 2.5 log(10) most probable number. Significantly more virus was transferred to participants' hands after single-gloving than after double-gloving.

CONCLUSIONS

Our comparison of double-gloving and single-gloving using a simulation system with MS2 and a most-probable number method suggests that double gloving can reduce the risk of viral contamination of HCWs' hands during PPE removal. If incorporated into practice when full PPE is worn, this practice may reduce the risk of viral contamination of HCWs' hands during PPE removal. The use of double gloves should be explored in larger controlled studies.

摘要

背景

在进行患者护理后,去除个人防护设备 (PPE) 可能会导致病毒转移到医护人员 (HCW) 的手部和衣物上。可以使用无害病毒来模拟这种转移风险,以获得定量数据。为了确定在去除污染的 PPE 过程中双层手套是否可以减少病毒转移到 HCW 的手部和衣物上,我们使用噬菌体进行了一项人体挑战研究,比较了单手套和双手套技术在去除 PPE 时病毒转移到手部和衣物上的频率和数量。

方法

每个实验都有双手套阶段和单手套阶段。参与者戴上 PPE(即接触隔离服、N95 口罩、眼部保护、乳胶手套)。隔离服、口罩、眼部保护和主要手套都被噬菌体污染。参与者然后脱下 PPE,并对他们的手部、面部和工作服进行病毒采样。

结果

在去除 PPE 过程中,单手套转移到手上的病毒频率明显高于双手套。单手套和双手套的工作服转移病毒相似。转移到手上的病毒量范围为 0.15 到 2.5 对数(10)最可能数量。单手套后转移到参与者手上的病毒明显多于双手套后。

结论

我们使用 MS2 和最可能数量方法的模拟系统比较了双层手套和单层手套,表明在去除 PPE 时,双层手套可以降低 HCW 手部病毒污染的风险。如果在穿着全套 PPE 时将其纳入实践,这种做法可能会降低 HCW 手部在去除 PPE 过程中病毒污染的风险。应在更大规模的对照研究中探索使用双层手套。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc0/7115263/0db6a6de62d2/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc0/7115263/969af03a0c15/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc0/7115263/0db6a6de62d2/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc0/7115263/969af03a0c15/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc0/7115263/0db6a6de62d2/gr2_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of single- versus double-gloving on virus transfer to health care workers' skin and clothing during removal of personal protective equipment.脱除个人防护装备过程中,单层与双层手套对病毒转移至医护人员皮肤和衣物的影响。
Am J Infect Control. 2012 May;40(4):369-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.04.324. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
2
Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff.医护人员用于预防因接触受污染体液而感染高度传染性疾病的个人防护装备。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 15;5(5):CD011621. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011621.pub5.
3
Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff.用于医护人员预防因接触受污染体液而感染高传染性疾病的个人防护装备。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 15;4(4):CD011621. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011621.pub4.
4
Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff.用于防止医护人员因接触受污染体液而感染高传染性疾病的个人防护装备。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 1;7(7):CD011621. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011621.pub3.
5
Respiratory viruses on personal protective equipment and bodies of healthcare workers.医护人员个人防护装备和身体上携带的呼吸道病毒。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Dec;40(12):1356-1360. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.298. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
6
Contamination of Health Care Personnel During Removal of Personal Protective Equipment.医护人员在脱卸个人防护装备时受到污染。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Dec;175(12):1904-10. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4535.
7
Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff.用于预防医护人员因接触受污染体液而感染高传染性疾病的个人防护装备。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 19;4:CD011621. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011621.pub2.
8
Which type of personal protective equipment (PPE) and which method of donning or doffing PPE carries the least risk of infection for healthcare workers?哪种个人防护装备(PPE)以及哪种穿戴或脱卸PPE的方法对医护人员来说感染风险最低?
Evid Based Dent. 2020 Jun;21(2):74-76. doi: 10.1038/s41432-020-0097-3.
9
Assessing Viral Transfer During Doffing of Ebola-Level Personal Protective Equipment in a Biocontainment Unit.评估生物安全防护单元中脱除埃博拉级个人防护装备时的病毒传播。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 5;66(6):945-949. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix956.
10
Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection.双层手套可减少手术交叉感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(3):CD003087. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003087.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors associated with correction of personal protective equipment nonadherence in a multidisciplinary emergency department setting: A retrospective video review.多学科急诊科环境中与纠正个人防护装备不依从性相关的因素:一项回顾性视频审查
Am J Infect Control. 2025 Jan;53(1):30-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2024.08.001. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
2
Personal protection equipment: Preliminary evidence of effectiveness from a three-phase simulation program.个人防护装备:来自一个三阶段模拟项目的有效性初步证据。
J Infect Prev. 2023 Nov;24(6):244-251. doi: 10.1177/17571774231208118. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
3
Occupational skin dermatoses among health care workers: A review of adverse skin reactions to personal protective equipment.

本文引用的文献

1
Hand hygiene compliance rates in the United States--a one-year multicenter collaboration using product/volume usage measurement and feedback.美国的手卫生依从率——一项为期一年的多中心合作,采用产品/用量测量与反馈方法。
Am J Med Qual. 2009 May-Jun;24(3):205-13. doi: 10.1177/1062860609332369. Epub 2009 Mar 30.
2
Evaluation of murine norovirus as a surrogate for human norovirus and hepatitis A virus in heat inactivation studies.评估鼠诺如病毒作为热失活研究中人类诺如病毒和甲型肝炎病毒的替代物。
J Appl Microbiol. 2009 Jul;107(1):65-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04179.x. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
3
The power of vivid experience in hand hygiene compliance.
医护人员的职业性皮肤疾病:对个人防护装备的不良皮肤反应综述
Dermatol Reports. 2022 Nov 21;14(4):9474. doi: 10.4081/dr.2022.9474.
4
Evidence of surface contamination in hospital rooms occupied by patients infected with monkeypox, Germany, June 2022.2022 年 6 月,德国猴痘感染患者入住的病房表面污染证据。
Euro Surveill. 2022 Jun;27(26). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.26.2200477.
5
Barriers faced by health-care workers in use of personal protective equipment during COVID pandemic at tertiary care hospital Uttarakhand, India: A qualitative study.印度北阿坎德邦三级护理医院医护人员在新冠疫情期间使用个人防护装备时面临的障碍:一项定性研究
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Feb 26;11:74. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_406_21. eCollection 2022.
6
Double-gloving in an Intensive Care Unit during the COVID-19 pandemic.2019冠状病毒病大流行期间重症监护病房的双层手套使用情况
Eur J Intern Med. 2022 Jun;100:127-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2022.02.005. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
7
Skin-related problems associated with the use of personal protective equipment among health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A online survey study.医护人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用个人防护设备所引起的皮肤相关问题:一项在线调查研究。
J Tissue Viability. 2022 Feb;31(1):112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2022.01.003. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
8
Infection Control in the Era of COVID-19: A Narrative Review.新冠疫情时代的感染控制:一篇叙述性综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Oct 14;10(10):1244. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10101244.
9
Comparison of the Efficiency and Usability of Aerosol Box and Intubation Tent on Intubation of a Manikin Using Personal Protective Equipment: A Randomized Crossover Study.使用个人防护装备对模拟患者进行插管时,喷雾箱与插管帐篷的效率和易用性比较:一项随机交叉研究。
J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;61(6):695-704. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.07.023. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
10
COVID-19 pandemic and preparedness of anesthesia team in a stand-alone cancer centre in Eastern India.新冠疫情与印度东部一家独立癌症中心麻醉团队的准备工作
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Apr-Jun;37(2):284-289. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_454_20. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
生动体验在手部卫生合规方面的作用。
J Hosp Infect. 2009 May;72(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.01.021. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
4
Methods for the recovery of a model virus from healthcare personal protective equipment.从个人防护设备中回收模型病毒的方法。
J Appl Microbiol. 2009 Apr;106(4):1244-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.04093.x. Epub 2009 Jan 30.
5
Virus transfer from personal protective equipment to healthcare employees' skin and clothing.病毒从个人防护装备传播至医护人员的皮肤和衣物上。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2008 Aug;14(8):1291-3. doi: 10.3201/eid1408.080085.
6
2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Health Care Settings.《2007年隔离预防指南:医疗机构中预防感染性因子的传播》
Am J Infect Control. 2007 Dec;35(10 Suppl 2):S65-164. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.10.007.
7
Evaluation of murine norovirus, feline calicivirus, poliovirus, and MS2 as surrogates for human norovirus in a model of viral persistence in surface water and groundwater.在地表水和地下水病毒持久性模型中,评估小鼠诺如病毒、猫杯状病毒、脊髓灰质炎病毒和MS2作为人类诺如病毒替代物的情况。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Jan;74(2):477-84. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02095-06. Epub 2007 Dec 7.
8
Hand hygiene compliance in healthcare workers.医护人员的手卫生依从性。
J Hosp Infect. 2006 Nov;64(3):205-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.06.008. Epub 2006 Aug 8.
9
Contamination: a comparison of 2 personal protective systems.污染:两种个人防护系统的比较
CMAJ. 2006 Aug 1;175(3):249-54. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060094.
10
Cluster of cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome among Toronto healthcare workers after implementation of infection control precautions: a case series.实施感染控制预防措施后多伦多医护人员中严重急性呼吸综合征病例群:病例系列
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006 May;27(5):473-8. doi: 10.1086/504363. Epub 2006 Apr 26.