Robson Val, Yorke Janelle, Sen Rachel A, Lowe Derek, Rogers Simon N
CNS Leg Ulcer Care, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool L9 7AL, United Kingdom.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Jun;50(4):321-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.07.014. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of using Leptospermum honey in a randomised trial to reduce the incidence of wound infection after microvascular free tissue reconstruction for cancer of the head and neck. During the one-year study period 70 consecutive patients were admitted to the regional maxillofacial ward for free tissue reconstruction. Of these, 56 (80%) consented to be randomised and 49 (70%) were actually randomised, 25 into the honey dressings group, and 24 into the conventional dressings group (control). Six patients were missed when consent was required, 8 did not consent, and 7 who had given consent were missed at the randomisation stage in theatre. Results of wound swabs were positive in 36% of the honey group and 38% of the control group. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was found in 28% and 25%, respectively. Of these, 38% were deemed to require intervention. Honey dressings were acceptable to both patients and nurses. There was a reduction (p<0.05) in duration of hospital stay in the honey group (median 12 days, IQR 10-21) compared with the control (median 18 days, IQR 13-28). The cost of standard and honey dressings was similar. This feasibility study has shown that a randomised controlled trial (RCT) is possible and that several hundreds of patients would be required to show a clinical benefit for honey. Further research is needed to confirm a shorter duration of hospital admission and if so, whether this is due to more rapid healing.
本研究的目的是评估在一项随机试验中使用麦卢卡蜂蜜以降低头颈部癌症微血管游离组织重建术后伤口感染发生率的可行性。在为期一年的研究期间,70例连续患者入住区域颌面病房接受游离组织重建。其中,56例(80%)同意随机分组,49例(70%)实际进行了随机分组,25例进入蜂蜜敷料组,24例进入传统敷料组(对照组)。在需要获取同意时,有6例患者被遗漏,8例不同意,7例已同意的患者在手术室随机分组阶段被遗漏。蜂蜜组伤口拭子结果阳性率为36%,对照组为38%。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的检出率分别为28%和25%。其中,38%的病例被认为需要干预。蜂蜜敷料患者和护士均可接受。与对照组(中位数18天,四分位间距13 - 28天)相比,蜂蜜组住院时间缩短(p<0.05)(中位数12天,四分位间距10 - 21天)。标准敷料和蜂蜜敷料的成本相似。这项可行性研究表明,进行随机对照试验(RCT)是可行的,并且需要数百名患者才能显示出蜂蜜的临床益处。需要进一步研究以确认住院时间是否更短,如果是,这是否归因于愈合更快。