Suppr超能文献

锥形束计算机断层扫描获得的轴位图像的准确性评估。

Accuracy assessment of the axial images obtained from cone beam computed tomography.

机构信息

Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, School of Dentistry, Campinas, Brazil.

出版信息

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011 Sep;40(6):369-78. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/88722046.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate accuracy of linear measurements assessed from axial tomograms and the influence of the use of different protocols in two cone beam CT (CBCT) units.

METHODS

A cylinder object consisting of Nylon® (Day Brazil, Sao Paulo, Brazil) with radiopaque markers was radiographically examined applying different protocols from NewTom 3G(TM) (Quantitative Radiology s.r.l, Verona, Veneto, Italy) and i-CAT(TM) (Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA) units. Horizontal (A-B) and vertical (C-D) distances were assessed from axial tomograms and measured using a digital calliper that provided the gold standard for actual values.

RESULTS

There were differences when considering acquisition protocols to each CBCT unit. Concerning all analysed protocols from i-CAT(TM) and Newtom 3G(TM), both A-B and C-D distances presented underestimated values. Measurements of the axial images obtained from NewTom 3G(TM) (6 inch 0.16 mm and 9 inch 0.25 mm) were similar to the ones obtained from i-CAT(TM) (13 cm 20 s 0.3 mm, 13 cm 20 s 0.4 mm and 13 cm 40 s 0.25 mm).

CONCLUSION

The use of different protocols from CBCT machines influences linear measurements assessed from axial images. Linear distances were underestimated in both equipments. Our findings suggest that the best protocol for the i-CAT(TM) is 13 cm 20 s 0.3 mm and for the NewTom 3G(TM), the use of 6 inch or 9 inch is recommended.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估从轴向断层图像得出的线性测量的准确性,以及在两个锥形束 CT(CBCT)设备中使用不同方案的影响。

方法

使用 NewTom 3G(TM)(定量放射学有限公司,维罗纳,威尼托,意大利)和 i-CAT(TM)(成像科学国际公司,哈特菲尔德,宾夕法尼亚州)的不同方案对由 Nylon®(Day Brazil,圣保罗,巴西)制成的带有放射性标记的圆柱体物体进行放射照相检查。从轴向断层图像评估水平(A-B)和垂直(C-D)距离,并使用数字卡尺进行测量,该卡尺为实际值提供了金标准。

结果

考虑到每个 CBCT 设备的采集方案,存在差异。对于 i-CAT(TM)和 Newtom 3G(TM)的所有分析方案,A-B 和 C-D 距离均呈现出低估值。从 NewTom 3G(TM)(6 英寸 0.16 毫米和 9 英寸 0.25 毫米)获得的轴向图像的测量值与从 i-CAT(TM)获得的测量值相似(13 厘米 20 秒 0.3 毫米,13 厘米 20 秒 0.4 毫米和 13 厘米 40 秒 0.25 毫米)。

结论

CBCT 机器的不同方案的使用会影响从轴向图像评估得出的线性测量。两种设备的线性距离均被低估。我们的研究结果表明,i-CAT(TM)的最佳方案为 13 厘米 20 秒 0.3 毫米,而对于 NewTom 3G(TM),建议使用 6 英寸或 9 英寸。

相似文献

1
Accuracy assessment of the axial images obtained from cone beam computed tomography.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011 Sep;40(6):369-78. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/88722046.
3
Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Jul;134(1):112-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.08.024.
6
Accuracy of linear measurement provided by cone beam computed tomography to assess bone quantity in the posterior maxilla: a human cadaver study.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008 Dec;10(4):226-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00083.x. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
7
Influence of cone beam CT scanning parameters on grey value measurements at an implant site.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(3):79884780. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/79884780. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
8
Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in linear measurements on axial images obtained by cone-beam computed tomography.
Imaging Sci Dent. 2017 Mar;47(1):11-15. doi: 10.5624/isd.2017.47.1.11. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
9
Cone beam CT and conventional tomography for the detection of morphological temporomandibular joint changes.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2007 May;36(4):192-7. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/25523853.
10
Accuracy of chemically created periapical lesion measurements using limited cone beam computed tomography.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010 Feb;39(2):95-9. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/85088069.

引用本文的文献

3
Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in linear measurements on axial images obtained by cone-beam computed tomography.
Imaging Sci Dent. 2017 Mar;47(1):11-15. doi: 10.5624/isd.2017.47.1.11. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
4
Quality assurance phantoms for cone beam computed tomography: a systematic literature review.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017 Mar;46(3):20160329. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20160329. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
5
A Diagnosis of Maxillary Sinus Fracture with Cone-Beam CT: Case Report and Literature Review.
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2014 Jun;7(2):85-91. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1371550. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
7
Cone-beam computed tomography and microtomography for alveolar bone measurements.
Surg Radiol Anat. 2013 Aug;35(6):495-502. doi: 10.1007/s00276-013-1080-x. Epub 2013 Feb 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison between two-dimensional and midsagittal three-dimensional cephalometric measurements of dry human skulls.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jul;49(5):392-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.06.006. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
3
Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Apr;137(4 Suppl):S100-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.040.
7
Image distortion and spatial resolution of a commercially available cone-beam computed tomography machine.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Oct;134(4):573-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.11.025.
8
Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging with physical measures.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008 Feb;37(2):80-93. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/31349994.
9
Accuracy of linear measurements using dental cone beam and conventional multislice computed tomography.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008 Jan;37(1):10-7. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/14140281.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验