SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA. friedmaa @ upstate.edu
Nephron Clin Pract. 2011;119 Suppl 1:c14-8. doi: 10.1159/000328020. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
Excellent results of transplantation in elderly recipients, together with regulatory requirements encourage continued consideration of this modality. The organ shortage compels the use of deceased-donor kidneys and may be a suboptimal therapy. However, the elderly patient may not tolerate the prolonged wait for an optimal organ. While individual comorbidities can be evaluated, patient selection requires the transplantation team to render a judgment based on the candidate's overall condition, which is best correlated with the ability to accomplish activities of daily living and to perform moderate exercise. Psychosocial considerations are complex in the elderly patient because of frequent dementia, absence of a sufficient support mechanism and the need for more resources than those required by younger patients. After transplantation, appropriate management of immunosuppression typically entails lower doses in elderly patients, a logical consequence of immunosenescence. Transplantation should not be considered an acceptable exercise in futility when the ability to offer this life-saving therapy to other patients will be adversely affected by doing so.
优秀的老年受者移植结果,加上监管要求,鼓励继续考虑这种方式。器官短缺迫使使用已故供者的肾脏,这可能不是最佳的治疗方法。然而,老年患者可能无法耐受长时间等待理想的器官。虽然可以评估个体合并症,但患者选择需要移植团队根据候选者的整体状况做出判断,这与完成日常生活活动和进行适度运动的能力密切相关。由于老年患者常伴有痴呆、缺乏足够的支持机制以及需要比年轻患者更多的资源,因此心理社会方面的考虑非常复杂。在免疫抑制方面,适当的管理在老年患者中通常需要较低的剂量,这是免疫衰老的合理结果。如果这种治疗方法会对其他患者的生存造成负面影响,那么不应该将移植视为无效的治疗。