Marcus H E, Behrend A, Schier R, Dagtekin O, Teschendorf P, Böttiger B W, Spöhr F
Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinik Köln, Deutschland.
Anaesthesist. 2011 Oct;60(10):916-28. doi: 10.1007/s00101-011-1931-y. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
The rate of Caesarean sections in Germany continues to rise. The change in anesthetic technique of choice from general to spinal anesthesia began later than in other countries and at the last survey in 2002 was not widely established. The literature on the anesthetic management of Caesarean sections contains many controversies, for example fluid preload before performing spinal anesthesia and the vasopressor of choice. Other issues have received relatively little attention, such as the level of experience of anesthesiologists working autonomously on the labour ward or the timing of antibiotic prophylaxis. The aim of the current survey was to provide an updated overview of anesthetic management of Caesarean sections in Germany.
A questionnaire was sent out to 709 departments of anesthesiology serving obstetric units in Germany. The questionnaire concerned various aspects of anesthetic management of Caesarean sections.
A total of 360 questionnaires (50.8%) were returned of which 346 were complete and could be analyzed, accounting for 330,000 births and 90,000 Caesarean sections per year. The predominant anesthetic method used for Caesarean sections was spinal anesthesia (90.8%) using hyperbaric bupivacaine and in approximately one third of the hospitals surveyed without administering intrathecal opioids. Approximately 12% of the departments surveyed used traumatic Quincke needles. In 86.2% the vasopressor of choice was caffedrine/theodrenaline. Nitrous oxide was used in only 19.2% of departments surveyed when general anesthesia is performed. An antibiotic drug was administered in only 11% of hospitals before cord clamping. In 43.1% no neonatologist was available to treat unexpected critically ill newborns. In 32.1% of departments surveyed residents with less than 2 years experience worked autonomously on the labour ward.
Currently the predominant anesthetic technique of choice in Germany is spinal anaesthesia and at a much higher rate than in 2002. In addition 12% of departments use traumatic Quincke needles which are associated with a higher incidence of postpuncture headache. Nitrous oxide is no longer frequently used in Germany. Finally, the administration of an antibiotic before cord clamping has been shown to lead to lower rates of endometritis and postoperative wound infection without detrimental effects on the newborn. This is practiced in only a small minority of departments across Germany.
德国剖宫产率持续上升。麻醉技术选择从全身麻醉向脊髓麻醉的转变比其他国家开始得晚,在2002年的上次调查中尚未广泛确立。关于剖宫产麻醉管理的文献存在许多争议,例如脊髓麻醉前的液体预负荷以及首选的血管加压药。其他问题受到的关注相对较少,例如在产房自主工作的麻醉医生的经验水平或抗生素预防的时机。本次调查的目的是提供德国剖宫产麻醉管理的最新概况。
向德国709个为产科单位服务的麻醉科发送了一份问卷。该问卷涉及剖宫产麻醉管理的各个方面。
共收回360份问卷(50.8%),其中346份完整且可进行分析,每年涉及330,000例分娩和90,000例剖宫产。剖宫产使用的主要麻醉方法是脊髓麻醉(90.8%),使用重比重布比卡因(hyperbaric bupivacaine),并且在大约三分之一接受调查的医院中未给予鞘内阿片类药物。大约12%的接受调查科室使用有创的昆克针(traumatic Quincke needles)。在86.2%的科室中,首选的血管加压药是咖啡因/茶丙胺(caffedrine/theodrenaline)。在进行全身麻醉时,仅19.2%的接受调查科室使用氧化亚氮。只有11%的医院在脐带钳夹前给予抗生素药物。在43.1%的情况下,没有新生儿科医生可用于治疗意外的危重新生儿。在32.1%接受调查的科室中,经验不足2年的住院医生在产房自主工作。
目前在德国,主要的麻醉技术选择是脊髓麻醉,且比例比2002年高得多。此外,12%的科室使用与穿刺后头痛发生率较高相关的有创昆克针。氧化亚氮在德国不再经常使用。最后,已证明在脐带钳夹前给予抗生素可降低子宫内膜炎和术后伤口感染的发生率,且对新生儿无不利影响。这在德国只有极少数科室实施。