• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神分裂症患者艾伦认知水平 4 级与 5 级的认知特征差异。

Cognitive profile difference between Allen Cognitive Levels 4 and 5 in schizophrenia.

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Am J Occup Ther. 2011 Jul-Aug;65(4):453-61. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2011.000711.

DOI:10.5014/ajot.2011.000711
PMID:21834461
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We compared the pattern of cognitive deficits exhibited by people with schizophrenia at Allen Cognitive Level (ACL) 4 with that of people at Level 5.

METHOD

Participants were classified into two groups on the basis of their ACL Screen scores: ACL 4 (n = 35) and ACL 5 (n = 41). We assessed cognitive functions and psychotic symptoms in all participants.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis of covariance controlling for gender and negative symptoms revealed that people at ACL 4 performed significantly worse than those at ACL 5 on processing speed, verbal memory, and working memory. The discriminant analysis with all cognitive variables produced a classification accuracy of 78% in differentiation of cognitive levels.

CONCLUSION

We verified the validity of the hierarchy of cognitive disability for ACLs 4 and 5 in people with schizophrenia.

摘要

目的

我们比较了认知障碍模式在艾伦认知水平(ACL)4 级和 5 级的精神分裂症患者中的表现。

方法

根据 ACL 筛查评分,参与者被分为两组:ACL 4 级(n=35)和 ACL 5 级(n=41)。我们评估了所有参与者的认知功能和精神病症状。

结果

多变量协方差分析控制性别和阴性症状显示,ACL 4 级的患者在处理速度、言语记忆和工作记忆方面的表现明显差于 ACL 5 级。使用所有认知变量的判别分析在区分认知水平方面产生了 78%的分类准确性。

结论

我们验证了 ACL 4 和 5 级的认知障碍分层在精神分裂症患者中的有效性。

相似文献

1
Cognitive profile difference between Allen Cognitive Levels 4 and 5 in schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者艾伦认知水平 4 级与 5 级的认知特征差异。
Am J Occup Ther. 2011 Jul-Aug;65(4):453-61. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2011.000711.
2
Factors related to hospital utilisation for people living with schizophrenia: Examining Allen's Cognitive Level Scores, recommended supports and routinely collected variables.精神分裂症患者住院利用的相关因素:审视艾伦认知水平评分、推荐支持措施及常规收集变量。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2019 Oct;66(5):591-602. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12597. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
3
Concurrent and predictive validity of the Allen Cognitive Levels Assessment.
Psychiatry Res. 1998 Sep 21;80(3):287-98. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(98)00078-x.
4
Profile of cognitive problems in schizophrenia and implications for vocational functioning.精神分裂症认知问题概况及其对职业功能的影响。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2009 Aug;56(4):220-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2008.00759.x.
5
A comparison of the Allen Cognitive Level Test and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in adults with schizophrenia.
Am J Occup Ther. 2000 Mar-Apr;54(2):129-33. doi: 10.5014/ajot.54.2.129.
6
Cognitive neuropsychological functioning in New Zealand Māori diagnosed with schizophrenia.被诊断患有精神分裂症的新西兰毛利人的认知神经心理功能。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;50(6):566-76. doi: 10.1177/0004867415607986. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
7
Relation between jumping to conclusions and cognitive functioning in people with schizophrenia in contrast with healthy participants.与健康参与者相比,精神分裂症患者中妄下结论与认知功能之间的关系。
Schizophr Res. 2014 Oct;159(1):211-7. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.07.026. Epub 2014 Aug 10.
8
Adolescent performance on the Allen Cognitive Levels Screen.
Am J Occup Ther. 2003 May-Jun;57(3):342-6. doi: 10.5014/ajot.57.3.342.
9
Role of learning potential in cognitive remediation: Construct and predictive validity.学习潜能在认知康复中的作用:结构效度与预测效度。
Schizophr Res. 2016 Mar;171(1-3):117-24. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.01.044. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
10
Predicting quality of life impairment in chronic schizophrenia from cognitive variables.从认知变量预测慢性精神分裂症患者的生活质量损害情况。
Qual Life Res. 2007 Aug;16(6):929-37. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9195-3. Epub 2007 Apr 3.