• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前瞻性评估入住重症监护病房的肝硬化患者的预后评分。

Prospective evaluation of the prognostic scores for cirrhotic patients admitted to an intensive care unit.

机构信息

AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Villejuif, France.

出版信息

J Hepatol. 2012 Jan;56(1):95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.06.024. Epub 2011 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhep.2011.06.024
PMID:21835136
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Cirrhotic patients admitted to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) have a poor prognosis. Identifying patients in whom ICU care will be useful can be challenging. The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of prognostic scores with respect to mortality and to identify mortality risk factors.

METHODS

Three hundred and seventy-seven cirrhotic patients admitted to a Liver ICU between May 2005 and March 2009 were enrolled in this study. Their average age was 55.5±11.4 years. The etiology of cirrhosis was alcohol (68%), virus hepatitis (18%), or mixed (5.5%). The main causes of hospitalization were gastrointestinal hemorrhage (43%), sepsis (19%), and hepatic encephalopathy (12%).

RESULTS

ICU and in-hospital mortality rates were 34.7% and 43.0%, respectively. Infection was the major cause of death (81.6%). ROC curve analysis demonstrated that SOFA (0.92) and SAPS II (0.89) scores calculated within 24h of admission predicted ICU mortality better than the Child-Pugh score (0.79) or MELD scores with (0.79-0.82) or without the incorporation of serum sodium levels (0.82). Statistical analysis showed that the prognostic severity scores, organ replacement therapy, and infection were accurate predictors of mortality. On multivariate analysis, mechanical ventilation, vasopressor therapy, bilirubin level at admission, and infection were independently associated with ICU mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

For cirrhotic patients admitted to the ICU, SAPS II, and SOFA scores predicted ICU mortality better than liver-specific scores. Mechanical ventilation or vasopressor therapy, bilirubin levels at admission and infection in patients with advanced cirrhosis were associated with a poor outcome.

摘要

背景与目的

入住重症监护病房(ICU)的肝硬化患者预后较差。确定 ICU 治疗有用的患者可能具有挑战性。本研究的目的是评估预后评分对死亡率的预测价值,并确定死亡风险因素。

方法

本研究纳入了 2005 年 5 月至 2009 年 3 月期间入住肝脏 ICU 的 377 例肝硬化患者。他们的平均年龄为 55.5±11.4 岁。肝硬化的病因是酒精(68%)、病毒肝炎(18%)或混合(5.5%)。住院的主要原因是胃肠道出血(43%)、败血症(19%)和肝性脑病(12%)。

结果

ICU 和住院死亡率分别为 34.7%和 43.0%。感染是主要的死亡原因(81.6%)。ROC 曲线分析表明,入院后 24 小时内计算的 SOFA(0.92)和 SAPS II(0.89)评分比 Child-Pugh 评分(0.79)或 MELD 评分(0.79-0.82)更好地预测 ICU 死亡率,MELD 评分包含或不包含血清钠水平(0.82)。统计分析表明,预后严重程度评分、器官替代治疗和感染是死亡率的准确预测因素。多变量分析显示,机械通气、升压治疗、入院时胆红素水平和感染与 ICU 死亡率独立相关。

结论

对于入住 ICU 的肝硬化患者,SAPS II 和 SOFA 评分比肝脏特异性评分更好地预测 ICU 死亡率。机械通气或升压治疗、入院时胆红素水平和感染与晚期肝硬化患者的不良预后相关。

相似文献

1
Prospective evaluation of the prognostic scores for cirrhotic patients admitted to an intensive care unit.前瞻性评估入住重症监护病房的肝硬化患者的预后评分。
J Hepatol. 2012 Jan;56(1):95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.06.024. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
2
Risk factors, sequential organ failure assessment and model for end-stage liver disease scores for predicting short term mortality in cirrhotic patients admitted to intensive care unit.用于预测入住重症监护病房的肝硬化患者短期死亡率的危险因素、序贯器官衰竭评估及终末期肝病模型评分
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Apr 1;23(7):883-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02842.x.
3
Outcome of patients with cirrhosis requiring mechanical ventilation in ICU.ICU 中需要机械通气的肝硬化患者的转归。
J Hepatol. 2014 Mar;60(3):570-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.11.012. Epub 2013 Nov 23.
4
Role of serum creatinine and prognostic scoring systems in assessing hospital mortality in critically ill cirrhotic patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.血清肌酐和预后评分系统在评估肝硬化合并上消化道出血重症患者医院死亡率中的作用
J Nephrol. 2003 Jul-Aug;16(4):558-65.
5
Outcome prediction for critically ill cirrhotic patients: a comparison of APACHE II and Child-Pugh scoring systems.危重症肝硬化患者的预后预测:APACHE II评分系统与Child-Pugh评分系统的比较
J Intensive Care Med. 2004 Mar-Apr;19(2):105-10. doi: 10.1177/0885066603261991.
6
The outcome of critical illness in decompensated alcoholic liver cirrhosis.失代偿期酒精性肝硬化患者的危重病结局。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Sep;56(8):987-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02692.x. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
7
Cirrhotic patients in the medical intensive care unit: early prognosis and long-term survival.肝硬化患者在重症监护病房:早期预后和长期生存。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Nov;38(11):2108-16. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f3dea9.
8
Outcome scoring systems for short-term prognosis in critically ill cirrhotic patients.危重症肝硬化患者短期预后的评分系统。
Shock. 2011 Nov;36(5):445-50. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31822fb7e2.
9
[Prognostic indicators in patients with liver cirrhosis admitted to an intensive care unit].[入住重症监护病房的肝硬化患者的预后指标]
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1996;20(3):263-8.
10
Serum sodium predicts prognosis in critically ill cirrhotic patients.血清钠预测危重症肝硬化患者的预后。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Mar;44(3):220-6. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181aabbcd.

引用本文的文献

1
Early acetaminophen administration and mortality outcomes in critically ill patients with cirrhosis: a retrospective analysis from the MIMIC-IV database.肝硬化重症患者早期使用对乙酰氨基酚与死亡率结局:来自MIMIC-IV数据库的回顾性分析
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Jul 16;25(1):522. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-04113-5.
2
The Aachen ACLF ICU score predicts ICU mortality in critically ill patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure.亚琛急性慢性肝衰竭重症监护病房评分可预测急性慢性肝衰竭重症患者的重症监护病房死亡率。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 16;14(1):30497. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82178-0.
3
Artificial intelligence-based evaluation of prognosis in cirrhosis.
基于人工智能的肝硬化预后评估。
J Transl Med. 2024 Oct 14;22(1):933. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05726-2.
4
Blood-pool SUV analysis of 99mTc-galactosyl human serum albumin (99mTc-GSA) normalized by blood volume for prediction of short-term survival in severe liver failure: preliminary report.通过血容量标准化的99m锝-半乳糖基人血清白蛋白(99mTc-GSA)血池SUV分析预测严重肝功能衰竭短期生存:初步报告
Ann Nucl Med. 2025 Jan;39(1):58-67. doi: 10.1007/s12149-024-01975-9. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
5
Outcomes of critically ill patients with liver failure who require mechanical ventilation: A retrospective, single-center study.需要机械通气的肝衰竭重症患者的预后:一项回顾性单中心研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 10;7(3):e1926. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1926. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Body composition and short-term mortality in patients critically ill with acute-on-chronic liver failure.慢性肝衰竭急性发作重症患者的身体组成与短期死亡率
JHEP Rep. 2023 Apr 7;5(8):100758. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100758. eCollection 2023 Aug.
7
Emerging concepts in the care of patients with cirrhosis and septic shock.肝硬化合并感染性休克患者护理的新观念
World J Hepatol. 2023 Apr 27;15(4):497-514. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v15.i4.497.
8
Upregulation of CCL5/RANTES Gene Expression in the Diaphragm of Mice with Cholestatic Liver Disease.胆汁淤积性肝病小鼠膈肌中 CCL5/RANTES 基因表达上调。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2023;1408:201-218. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-26163-3_11.
9
Acute-on-chronic liver failure: Terminology, mechanisms and management.急性慢性肝衰竭:术语、机制与管理。
Clin Mol Hepatol. 2023 Jul;29(3):670-689. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2022.0103. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
10
Clinical Predictors of Intensive Care Unit Transfer in Admitted Patients with Cirrhosis.肝硬化住院患者转入重症监护病房的临床预测因素。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Jun;68(6):2344-2359. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-07856-x. Epub 2023 Feb 12.