• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多民族亚洲人群中全球急性冠状动脉事件风险评分的重新校准。

Recalibration of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score in a multiethnic Asian population.

机构信息

National University Heart Centre, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2011 Aug;162(2):291-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.05.016. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2011.05.016
PMID:21835290
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a leading cause of mortality in Asia. However, quantitative risk scores to predict mortality after AMI were developed without the participation of Asian countries.

METHODS

We evaluated the performance of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) in-hospital mortality risk score, directly and after recalibration, in a large Singaporean cohort representing 3 major Asian ethnicities.

RESULTS

The GRACE cohort included 11,389 patients, predominantly of European descent, hospitalized for AMI or unstable angina from 2002 to 2003. The Singapore cohort included 10,100 Chinese, 3,005 Malay, and 2,046 Indian patients hospitalized for AMI from 2002 to 2005.Using the original GRACE score, predicted in-hospital mortality was 2.4% (Chinese), 2.0% (Malay), and 1.6% (Indian). However, observed in-hospital mortality was much greater at 9.8% (Chinese), 7.6% (Malay), and 6.4% (Indian). The c statistic for Chinese, Malays, and Indians was 0.86, 0.86, and 0.84, respectively, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic was 250, 56, and 41, respectively. Recalibration of the GRACE score, using the mean-centered constants derived from the Singapore cohort, did not change the c statistic but substantially improved the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic to 90, 24, and 18, respectively. The recalibrated GRACE score predicted in-hospital mortality as follows: 7.7% (Chinese), 6.0% (Malay), and 5.2% (Indian).

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort of 3 major Asian ethnicities, the original GRACE score, derived from populations outside Asia, underestimated in-hospital mortality after AMI. Recalibration improved risk estimation substantially and may help adapt externally developed risk scores for local practice.

摘要

背景

急性心肌梗死(AMI)是亚洲地区死亡的主要原因。然而,用于预测 AMI 后死亡率的定量风险评分是在没有亚洲国家参与的情况下制定的。

方法

我们评估了全球急性冠状动脉事件登记处(GRACE)住院期间死亡率风险评分在一个代表 3 大亚洲族群的大型新加坡队列中的表现,该队列直接进行了评分,也进行了重新校准。

结果

GRACE 队列纳入了 2002 年至 2003 年期间因 AMI 或不稳定型心绞痛住院的 11389 例主要为欧洲血统的患者。新加坡队列纳入了 2002 年至 2005 年期间因 AMI 住院的 10100 例华人、3005 例马来人和 2046 例印度人。使用原始 GRACE 评分,预测住院期间死亡率为 2.4%(华人)、2.0%(马来人)和 1.6%(印度人)。然而,实际住院期间死亡率要高得多,分别为 9.8%(华人)、7.6%(马来人)和 6.4%(印度人)。华人、马来人和印度人的 C 统计量分别为 0.86、0.86 和 0.84,Hosmer-Lemeshow 统计量分别为 250、56 和 41。使用源自新加坡队列的平均值中心常数对 GRACE 评分进行重新校准并没有改变 C 统计量,但显著改善了 Hosmer-Lemeshow 统计量,分别为 90、24 和 18。重新校准的 GRACE 评分预测住院期间死亡率如下:7.7%(华人)、6.0%(马来人)和 5.2%(印度人)。

结论

在这个由 3 大亚洲族群组成的大型队列中,源自亚洲以外人群的原始 GRACE 评分低估了 AMI 后的住院期间死亡率。重新校准大大提高了风险估计的准确性,可能有助于为当地实践调整外部开发的风险评分。

相似文献

1
Recalibration of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score in a multiethnic Asian population.多民族亚洲人群中全球急性冠状动脉事件风险评分的重新校准。
Am Heart J. 2011 Aug;162(2):291-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.05.016. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
2
Validation of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Event (GRACE) risk score for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome in Canada.加拿大急性冠状动脉综合征患者住院死亡率的全球急性冠状动脉事件注册研究(GRACE)风险评分的验证
Am Heart J. 2009 Sep;158(3):392-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.06.010.
3
Walking beyond the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) model in the death risk stratification during hospitalization in patients with acute coronary syndrome: what do the AR-G (ACTION [Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network] Registry and GWTG [Get With the Guidelines] Database), NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry), and EuroHeart Risk Scores Provide?在急性冠状动脉综合征患者住院期间的死亡风险分层中,超越 GRACE(全球急性冠状动脉事件注册)模型:AR-G(ACTION [急性冠状动脉治疗和干预结果网络]注册和 GWTG [遵循指南]数据库)、NCDR(国家心血管数据注册)和 EuroHeart 风险评分提供了什么?
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Nov;5(11):1117-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.06.023.
4
HEART score performance in Asian and Caucasian patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected acute coronary syndrome.HEART 评分在亚洲和高加索裔疑似急性冠脉综合征患者就诊于急诊科时的表现。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018 Oct;7(7):591-601. doi: 10.1177/2048872617700870. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
5
Comparison of the modified Singapore myocardial infarction registry risk score with GRACE 2.0 in predicting 1-year acute myocardial infarction outcomes.比较改良的新加坡心肌梗死登记风险评分与 GRACE 2.0 在预测 1 年急性心肌梗死结局中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 22;12(1):14270. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16523-6.
6
A novel risk stratification system "Angiographic GRACE Score" for predicting in-hospital mortality of patients with acute myocardial infarction: Data from the K-ACTIVE Registry.一种新型的风险分层系统“造影性 GRACE 评分”,用于预测急性心肌梗死患者住院期间的死亡率:来自 K-ACTIVE 登记研究的数据。
J Cardiol. 2021 Feb;77(2):179-185. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.08.010. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
7
Differences in late cardiovascular mortality following acute myocardial infarction in three major Asian ethnic groups.亚洲三大主要种族群体急性心肌梗死后晚期心血管死亡率的差异。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2014 Dec;3(4):354-62. doi: 10.1177/2048872614527007. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
8
In-hospital mortality analysis of Japanese patients with acute coronary syndrome using the Tokyo CCU Network database: Applicability of the GRACE risk score.利用东京冠心病监护病房网络数据库对日本急性冠状动脉综合征患者进行的院内死亡率分析:GRACE风险评分的适用性
J Cardiol. 2018 Mar;71(3):251-258. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
9
Validity of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score in prediction of acute myocardial infarction mortality in hospitalised Chinese patients aged 80 and over.全球急性冠状动脉事件注册风险评分对80岁及以上中国住院患者急性心肌梗死死亡率预测的有效性。
Australas J Ageing. 2014 Dec;33(4):E1-5. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12044. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
10
GRACE risk score: Sex-based validity of in-hospital mortality prediction in Canadian patients with acute coronary syndrome.GRACE 风险评分:加拿大急性冠脉综合征患者院内死亡率预测的性别有效性。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;244:24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.055. Epub 2017 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a risk score for predicting 30-day mortality in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者30天死亡率预测风险评分的开发与验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 15;15(1):8930. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92615-3.
2
Correlation of blood lipids, glucose, and inflammatory indices with the occurrence and prognosis of lesion complexity in unstable angina, a retrospective cohort study.血脂、血糖及炎症指标与不稳定型心绞痛病变复杂性发生及预后的相关性:一项回顾性队列研究
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Jan 24;17(1):413-428. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2024-2122. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
3
Artificial intelligence algorithms permits rapid acute kidney injury risk classification of patients with acute myocardial infarction.
人工智能算法可对急性心肌梗死患者进行快速的急性肾损伤风险分类。
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 8;10(16):e36051. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36051. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.
4
Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events Score Underestimates Post-Acute Coronary Syndrome Mortality among Cancer Patients.全球急性冠状动脉事件注册评分低估了癌症患者急性冠状动脉综合征后的死亡率。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Oct 30;15(21):5222. doi: 10.3390/cancers15215222.
5
Trends and predictions of metabolic risk factors for acute myocardial infarction: findings from a multiethnic nationwide cohort.急性心肌梗死代谢危险因素的趋势与预测:来自全国多民族队列的研究结果
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 May 31;37:100803. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100803. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
Comparison of the modified Singapore myocardial infarction registry risk score with GRACE 2.0 in predicting 1-year acute myocardial infarction outcomes.比较改良的新加坡心肌梗死登记风险评分与 GRACE 2.0 在预测 1 年急性心肌梗死结局中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 22;12(1):14270. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16523-6.
7
Systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic models in Southeast Asian populations with acute myocardial infarction.东南亚急性心肌梗死患者预后模型的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 26;9:921044. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.921044. eCollection 2022.
8
Readily accessible risk model to predict in-hospital major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a retrospective study of Chinese patients.易于获取的风险模型可预测急性心肌梗死患者住院期间的主要不良心脏事件:一项中国患者的回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 1;11(7):e044518. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044518.
9
The Difference in Accuracy Between Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events Score and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Score in Predicting In-Hospital Mortality of Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients.全球急性冠状动脉事件注册评分与心肌梗死溶栓评分在预测急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者院内死亡率方面的准确性差异
Cardiol Res. 2021 Jun;12(3):177-185. doi: 10.14740/cr1247. Epub 2021 May 14.
10
Plasma Ceramides as Prognostic Biomarkers and Their Arterial and Myocardial Tissue Correlates in Acute Myocardial Infarction.血浆神经酰胺作为急性心肌梗死的预后生物标志物及其与动脉和心肌组织的相关性
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2018 May 30;3(2):163-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2017.12.005. eCollection 2018 Apr.