Suppr超能文献

晚期卵巢癌中间隔肿瘤减灭术的最佳时机:尚未确定?

Optimal timing of interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer: yet to be defined?

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Regional Cancer Centre, 229, cours de l'Argonne, 33076 Bordeaux Cedex, France.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Dec;159(2):407-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.07.014. Epub 2011 Aug 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Interval debulking surgery (IDS) following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a treatment option in advanced ovarian cancer. It is recommended to perform IDS early, after 3 cycles of NAC, but late IDS (after 6 cycles) may yield better results. Delaying IDS, however, harbours the risk of loosing the opportunity for debulking surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective comparison of two groups of patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma (stages IIC-IV) treated by platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) having undergone early IDS (after 3.6 cycles, group 1, n=33) or late IDS (after 6.3 cycles, group 2, n=104). Contemporary patients who had undergone standard treatment by primary debulking surgery (PDS)+CT (group 3, n=446) and those treated by CT alone (group 4, n=64 patients) served as internal controls.

RESULTS

Prognosis in IDS patients (groups 1+2) was comparable to that in PDS patients (group 3). Only a few patients in group 4 potentially had lost an opportunity for debulking surgery. Groups 1 and 2 were well-matched concerning usual prognostic factors. Surgery extent and post-operative outcomes were similar in both. In contrast, complete cytoreductions were significantly more frequent in late than in early IDS (group 2 vs.1: 58% vs. 36%, p=0.03) and survival was not inferior in the late IDS group compared to the early IDS group with 37 vs. 22 months, respectively (p=0.09).

CONCLUSION

Late IDS yields higher complete resection rates than early IDS and should be evaluated prospectively for outcome in further trials.

摘要

目的

新辅助化疗(NAC)后间隔减瘤手术(IDS)是晚期卵巢癌的一种治疗选择。建议在 NAC 进行 3 个周期后尽早进行 IDS,但晚期 IDS(6 个周期后)可能会产生更好的结果。然而,延迟 IDS 会增加失去减瘤手术机会的风险。

研究设计

回顾性比较两组接受铂类化疗(CT)治疗的晚期卵巢癌(IIIC-IV 期)患者,这些患者接受早期 IDS(3.6 个周期后,第 1 组,n=33)或晚期 IDS(6.3 个周期后,第 2 组,n=104)。同期接受标准治疗的原发性减瘤手术(PDS)+CT(第 3 组,n=446)和单独 CT 治疗(第 4 组,n=64 例)的患者作为内部对照。

结果

IDS 患者(第 1 组+第 2 组)的预后与 PDS 患者(第 3 组)相当。只有少数第 4 组患者可能失去了减瘤手术的机会。第 1 组和第 2 组在通常的预后因素方面相匹配。两组的手术范围和术后结果相似。相比之下,晚期 IDS 中完全减瘤的比例明显高于早期 IDS(第 2 组与第 1 组:58%比 36%,p=0.03),且晚期 IDS 组的生存时间也不劣于早期 IDS 组,分别为 37 个月和 22 个月(p=0.09)。

结论

晚期 IDS 比早期 IDS 产生更高的完全切除率,应该在进一步的试验中前瞻性评估其结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验