Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Regional Cancer Centre, 229, cours de l'Argonne, 33076 Bordeaux Cedex, France.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Dec;159(2):407-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.07.014. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
Interval debulking surgery (IDS) following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a treatment option in advanced ovarian cancer. It is recommended to perform IDS early, after 3 cycles of NAC, but late IDS (after 6 cycles) may yield better results. Delaying IDS, however, harbours the risk of loosing the opportunity for debulking surgery.
Retrospective comparison of two groups of patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma (stages IIC-IV) treated by platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) having undergone early IDS (after 3.6 cycles, group 1, n=33) or late IDS (after 6.3 cycles, group 2, n=104). Contemporary patients who had undergone standard treatment by primary debulking surgery (PDS)+CT (group 3, n=446) and those treated by CT alone (group 4, n=64 patients) served as internal controls.
Prognosis in IDS patients (groups 1+2) was comparable to that in PDS patients (group 3). Only a few patients in group 4 potentially had lost an opportunity for debulking surgery. Groups 1 and 2 were well-matched concerning usual prognostic factors. Surgery extent and post-operative outcomes were similar in both. In contrast, complete cytoreductions were significantly more frequent in late than in early IDS (group 2 vs.1: 58% vs. 36%, p=0.03) and survival was not inferior in the late IDS group compared to the early IDS group with 37 vs. 22 months, respectively (p=0.09).
Late IDS yields higher complete resection rates than early IDS and should be evaluated prospectively for outcome in further trials.
新辅助化疗(NAC)后间隔减瘤手术(IDS)是晚期卵巢癌的一种治疗选择。建议在 NAC 进行 3 个周期后尽早进行 IDS,但晚期 IDS(6 个周期后)可能会产生更好的结果。然而,延迟 IDS 会增加失去减瘤手术机会的风险。
回顾性比较两组接受铂类化疗(CT)治疗的晚期卵巢癌(IIIC-IV 期)患者,这些患者接受早期 IDS(3.6 个周期后,第 1 组,n=33)或晚期 IDS(6.3 个周期后,第 2 组,n=104)。同期接受标准治疗的原发性减瘤手术(PDS)+CT(第 3 组,n=446)和单独 CT 治疗(第 4 组,n=64 例)的患者作为内部对照。
IDS 患者(第 1 组+第 2 组)的预后与 PDS 患者(第 3 组)相当。只有少数第 4 组患者可能失去了减瘤手术的机会。第 1 组和第 2 组在通常的预后因素方面相匹配。两组的手术范围和术后结果相似。相比之下,晚期 IDS 中完全减瘤的比例明显高于早期 IDS(第 2 组与第 1 组:58%比 36%,p=0.03),且晚期 IDS 组的生存时间也不劣于早期 IDS 组,分别为 37 个月和 22 个月(p=0.09)。
晚期 IDS 比早期 IDS 产生更高的完全切除率,应该在进一步的试验中前瞻性评估其结果。