Suppr超能文献

在犬颈动脉狭窄模型中进行定量磁共振血管成像的体内评估。

In vivo evaluation of quantitative MR angiography in a canine carotid artery stenosis model.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Sep;32(8):1552-9. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2546. Epub 2011 Aug 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Large-vessel cerebral blood flow quantification has emerged as a potential predictor of stroke risk. QMRA uses phase-contrast techniques to noninvasively measure vessel flows. To evaluate the in vivo accuracy of QMRA for measuring the effects of progressive arterial stenosis, we compared this technique with invasive flow measurements from a sonographic transit-time flow probe in a canine model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A sonographic flow probe was implanted around the CCA of hound dogs (n = 4) under general anesthesia. Pulsatile blood flow and arterial pressure were continuously recorded during CCA flow measurements with QMRA. A vascular tourniquet was applied around the CCA to produce progressive stenosis and varying flow rates. Statistical comparisons were made by using the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

A total of 60 paired CCA flow measurements were compared. Mean blood flows ranged between 21 and 691 mL/min during QMRA acquisition as measured by the flow probe. The correlation coefficients between flow probe and QMRA measurements for mean, maximum, and minimum volume flow rates were 0.99 (P < .0001), 0.98 (P < .0001), and 0.96 (P < .0001), respectively. The overall proportional difference between the 2 techniques was 7.8 ± 1%. Measurements at higher flow rates and in the absence of arterial stenosis had the lowest PD.

CONCLUSIONS

Noninvasive CCA flow measurements by using QMRA are accurate compared with invasive flow-probe measurements in a canine arterial flow model with stenosis and may be useful for the evaluation of the hemodynamic effects of stenosis caused by cerebrovascular atherosclerosis.

摘要

背景与目的

大血管脑血流定量已成为预测中风风险的一个潜在指标。QMRA 使用相位对比技术无创地测量血管流量。为了评估 QMRA 测量进行性动脉狭窄影响的体内准确性,我们将该技术与超声渡越时间流量探头的侵入性流量测量在犬模型中进行了比较。

材料与方法

在全身麻醉下,将超声流量探头植入猎犬的颈总动脉(CCA)周围。在使用 QMRA 进行 CCA 流量测量期间,连续记录搏动性血流和动脉压。在 CCA 周围施加血管止血带以产生进行性狭窄和不同的流量。通过使用 Pearson 积矩相关系数进行统计学比较。

结果

总共比较了 60 对 CCA 流量测量值。在使用流量探头测量时,QMRA 采集期间平均血流范围在 21 至 691 mL/min 之间。流量探头和 QMRA 测量的平均、最大和最小体积流量之间的相关系数分别为 0.99(P <.0001)、0.98(P <.0001)和 0.96(P <.0001)。这两种技术之间的总体比例差异为 7.8 ± 1%。在较高流量和无动脉狭窄的情况下进行的测量具有最低的 PD。

结论

在具有狭窄的犬动脉流量模型中,使用 QMRA 进行无创 CCA 流量测量与侵入性流量探头测量相比是准确的,并且可能对评估由脑血管粥样硬化引起的狭窄的血液动力学影响有用。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Flow-assisted surgical cerebral revascularization.血流辅助性手术脑血运重建
Neurosurg Focus. 2008;24(2):E20. doi: 10.3171/FOC/2008/24/2/E20.
9
Rapid assessment of perfusion-diffusion mismatch.灌注-扩散不匹配的快速评估
Stroke. 2008 Jan;39(1):75-81. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.490524. Epub 2007 Dec 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验