Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Oct 1;174(7):828-38. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr162. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
Adverse socioeconomic conditions, at both the individual and the neighborhood level, increase the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) death, but little is known regarding whether CRC survival varies geographically and the extent to which area-level socioeconomic deprivation affects this geographic variation. Using data from the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-AARP Diet and Health Study, the authors examined geographic variation and the role of area-level socioeconomic deprivation in CRC survival. CRC cases (n = 7,024), identified during 1995-2003, were followed for their CRC-specific vital status through 2005 and overall vital status through 2006. Bayesian multilevel survival models showed that there was significant geographic variation in overall (variance = 0.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.1, 0.2) and CRC-specific (variance = 0.3, 95% CI: 0.1, 0.4) risk of death. More socioeconomically deprived neighborhoods had a higher overall risk of death (most deprived quartile vs. least deprived: hazard ratio = 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1, 1.4) and a higher CRC-specific risk of death (most deprived quartile vs. least deprived: hazard ratio = 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1, 1.5). However, neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation did not account for the geographic variation in overall and CRC-specific risks of death. In future studies, investigators should evaluate other neighborhood characteristics to help explain geographic heterogeneity in CRC survival. Such research could facilitate interventions for reducing geographic disparity in CRC survival.
不利的社会经济条件,无论是在个人层面还是社区层面,都会增加结直肠癌(CRC)死亡的风险,但人们对 CRC 生存率是否存在地域差异以及社区层面的社会经济剥夺程度对这种地域差异的影响知之甚少。利用美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)-AARP 饮食与健康研究的数据,作者研究了 CRC 生存率的地域差异和社区层面社会经济剥夺的作用。CRC 病例(n=7024)于 1995-2003 年期间确诊,随访至 2005 年 CRC 特异性生存状态,随访至 2006 年总体生存状态。贝叶斯多层次生存模型显示,总体(方差=0.2,95%置信区间[CI]:0.1,0.2)和 CRC 特异性(方差=0.3,95%CI:0.1,0.4)死亡风险存在显著的地域差异。社会经济条件越差的社区,总体死亡风险越高(最贫困四分位数比最富裕四分位数:风险比=1.2,95%CI:1.1,1.4),CRC 特异性死亡风险也越高(最贫困四分位数比最富裕四分位数:风险比=1.2,95%CI:1.1,1.5)。然而,社区社会经济剥夺并不能解释总体和 CRC 特异性死亡风险的地域差异。在未来的研究中,研究人员应评估其他社区特征,以帮助解释 CRC 生存率的地域异质性。这种研究可以促进减少 CRC 生存率地域差异的干预措施。