• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孕期慢性高血压患者中不使用药物治疗与使用甲基多巴或拉贝洛尔治疗的比较。

A comparison of no medication versus methyldopa or labetalol in chronic hypertension during pregnancy.

作者信息

Sibai B M, Mabie W C, Shamsa F, Villar M A, Anderson G D

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee, Memphis.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Apr;162(4):960-6; discussion 966-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91297-p.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9378(90)91297-p
PMID:2183619
Abstract

Three hundred women with mild chronic hypertension at 6 to 13 weeks' gestation were randomly allocated to receive either methyldopa or labetalol or be in the control group. Thirty-seven women (12%) were excluded for various reasons. Of the remaining 263 patients, 90 received no drug, 87 received methyldopa, and 86 received labetalol. All 263 were followed throughout pregnancy with serial renal function tests and serial assessment of fetal status. There were no differences among the three groups in mean systolic or diastolic blood pressures, mean gestational age, or initial laboratory findings at time of entry. Patients treated with medications had significantly lower (p less than 0.0001) systolic and diastolic blood pressures throughout gestation compared with the no-medication group. Among the control group there was a spontaneously significant lowering (p less than 0.0001) of both systolic and diastolic blood pressures at 14 to 26 weeks' gestation. However, there were no differences among the three groups regarding the incidences of either superimposed preeclampsia (15.6%, 18.4%, and 16.3%, respectively), abruptio placentae (2.2%, 1.1%, and 2.3%, respectively), or preterm delivery (10%, 12.5%, and 11.6%, respectively). In addition, there were no differences among the groups regarding gestational age at delivery, birth weight, incidence of fetal growth retardation, or neonatal head circumference. There was one midtrimester loss in the methyldopa group and one stillbirth in each of the other groups. We conclude that treatment of maternal blood pressure in mild chronic hypertension during pregnancy did not improve perinatal outcome.

摘要

300名妊娠6至13周的轻度慢性高血压女性被随机分配接受甲基多巴或拉贝洛尔治疗或进入对照组。37名女性(12%)因各种原因被排除。在其余263名患者中,90名未接受药物治疗,87名接受甲基多巴治疗,86名接受拉贝洛尔治疗。对所有263名患者在整个孕期进行了系列肾功能检查和胎儿状况的系列评估。三组在平均收缩压或舒张压、平均孕周或入组时的初始实验室检查结果方面无差异。与未用药组相比,接受药物治疗的患者在整个孕期的收缩压和舒张压显著更低(p<0.0001)。在对照组中,妊娠14至26周时收缩压和舒张压均出现自发性显著下降(p<0.0001)。然而,三组在子痫前期(分别为15.6%、18.4%和16.3%)、胎盘早剥(分别为2.2%、1.1%和2.3%)或早产(分别为10%、12.5%和11.6%)的发生率方面无差异。此外,三组在分娩孕周、出生体重、胎儿生长受限发生率或新生儿头围方面也无差异。甲基多巴组有1例孕中期流产,其他组各有1例死产。我们得出结论,孕期轻度慢性高血压患者的母体血压治疗并未改善围产期结局。

相似文献

1
A comparison of no medication versus methyldopa or labetalol in chronic hypertension during pregnancy.孕期慢性高血压患者中不使用药物治疗与使用甲基多巴或拉贝洛尔治疗的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Apr;162(4):960-6; discussion 966-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91297-p.
2
Comparison of antihypertensive efficacy and perinatal safety of labetalol and methyldopa in the treatment of hypertension in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial.拉贝洛尔与甲基多巴治疗妊娠期高血压的降压疗效及围产期安全性比较:一项随机对照试验
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988 Sep;95(9):868-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb06571.x.
3
[Maternal effects and perinatal safety of labetalol in the treatment of hypertension in pregnancy. Comparison with methyldopa in a randomized cooperative trial].[拉贝洛尔治疗妊娠期高血压的母体效应及围产期安全性。在一项随机合作试验中与甲基多巴的比较]
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1987 Jun;80(6):952-5.
4
Control of Hypertension In Pregnancy Study randomised controlled trial-are the results dependent on the choice of labetalol or methyldopa?控制妊娠高血压研究随机对照试验 - 结果是否取决于拉贝洛尔或甲基多巴的选择?
BJOG. 2016 Jun;123(7):1135-41. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13568. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
5
Role of antihypertensive therapy in mild to moderate pregnancy-induced hypertension: a prospective randomized study comparing labetalol with alpha methyldopa.抗高血压治疗在轻度至中度妊娠高血压中的作用:一项比较拉贝洛尔和α-甲基多巴的前瞻性随机研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Jun;285(6):1553-62. doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-2205-2. Epub 2012 Jan 15.
6
Methyldopa versus labetalol or no medication for treatment of mild and moderate chronic hypertension during pregnancy: a randomized clinical trial.甲多巴与拉贝洛尔或无药物治疗轻中度慢性妊娠高血压:一项随机临床试验。
Hypertens Pregnancy. 2020 Nov;39(4):393-398. doi: 10.1080/10641955.2020.1791902. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
7
Oral antihypertensive regimens (nifedipine retard, labetalol, and methyldopa) for management of severe hypertension in pregnancy: an open-label, randomised controlled trial.口服降压方案(硝苯地平控释片、拉贝洛尔和甲基多巴)治疗妊娠重度高血压:一项开放标签、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2019 Sep 21;394(10203):1011-1021. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31282-6. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
8
Do labetalol and methyldopa have different effects on pregnancy outcome? Analysis of data from the Control of Hypertension In Pregnancy Study (CHIPS) trial.拉贝洛尔和甲基多巴对妊娠结局的影响是否不同?来自妊娠高血压控制研究(CHIPS)试验的数据分析。
BJOG. 2016 Jun;123(7):1143-51. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13569. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
9
Labetalol vs. methyldopa in the treatment of pregnancy-induced hypertension.拉贝洛尔与甲基多巴治疗妊娠高血压的对比研究
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995 May;49(2):125-30. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(95)02351-c.
10
Randomised controlled comparative study of methyldopa and oxprenolol in treatment of hypertension in pregnancy.甲基多巴与氧烯洛尔治疗妊娠期高血压的随机对照比较研究。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Jun 18;286(6382):1927-30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6382.1927.

引用本文的文献

1
Does geographical location impact the efficacy of oral antihypertensive therapy in pregnancy?地理位置会影响妊娠期口服抗高血压治疗的疗效吗?
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2025 Jun 10;26(2):142-153. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2024.2024-1-8.
2
Blood pressure-lowering treatment for pregnant women with non-severe hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非重度高血压孕妇的降压治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hypertens Res. 2025 May 23. doi: 10.1038/s41440-025-02239-3.
3
Clinical Trials That Have Changed Obstetric Practice: The Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy (CHAP) Trial.
改变产科实践的临床试验:慢性高血压与妊娠(CHAP)试验。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jun 1;67(2):411-417. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000857. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
4
Comparing Intravenous Labetalol and Intravenous Hydralazine for Managing Severe Gestational Hypertension.比较静脉注射拉贝洛尔和静脉注射肼屈嗪治疗重度妊娠高血压的效果。
Cureus. 2023 Jul 23;15(7):e42332. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42332. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
What BP target is appropriate for pregnant patients with mild chronic hypertension?对于轻度慢性高血压的孕妇患者,合适的血压目标值是多少?
J Fam Pract. 2023 May;72(4):183-184. doi: 10.12788/jfp.0589.
6
The impact of antihypertensive treatment of mild to moderate hypertension during pregnancy on maternal and neonatal outcomes: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.妊娠中轻度至中度高血压的降压治疗对母婴结局的影响:一项随机对照试验的更新荟萃分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2023 May;46(5):467-476. doi: 10.1002/clc.24013. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
7
Treatment for Mild Chronic Hypertension during Pregnancy.妊娠期轻度慢性高血压的治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2022 May 12;386(19):1781-1792. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2201295. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
8
Oral Antihypertensives for Nonsevere Pregnancy Hypertension: Systematic Review, Network Meta- and Trial Sequential Analyses.非重度妊娠高血压的口服降压药:系统评价、网络荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
Hypertension. 2022 Mar;79(3):614-628. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.18415. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
9
Optimal blood pressure target to prevent severe hypertension in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.优化血压目标以预防妊娠重度高血压:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hypertens Res. 2022 May;45(5):887-899. doi: 10.1038/s41440-022-00853-z. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
10
Preeclampsia beyond pregnancy: long-term consequences for mother and child.子痫前期不仅仅发生在孕期:母婴的长期后果。
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2020 Jun 1;318(6):F1315-F1326. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00071.2020. Epub 2020 Apr 6.