Ostergaard P A, Ebbesen F, Nolte H, Skov P S
Department of Pediatrics, Aalborg County Hospital, Denmark.
Allergy. 1990 Apr;45(3):231-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1990.tb00488.x.
The aim of the study is to compare the glass fibre-based basophil histamine release test with skin test (Phazet), RAST (Phadebas) and bronchial provocation test in children with allergic asthma. The study comprised 68 selected children with a case history of extrinsic allergic asthma to danders (cat and dog) and house-dust mite. Skin prick test, RAST, and histamine release were performed in all children and the bronchial provocation test was used as a reference of "true allergic asthma". A total of 81 allergen bronchial challenges were performed and 44 children experienced 49 positive provocations. In 2.9% (2/68) of the children histamine release could not be performed due to technical difficulties (low histamine release with anti-IgE). Concordances in the range 76-87% were observed with no significant difference between the tests. The highest concordance (87%) was found between histamine release and bronchial provocation test followed by skin prick test vs bronchial provocation (84%) and RAST vs bronchial provocation (80%). The sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each test. All tests showed sensitivities in the range 90-94% and no significant difference between them was observed. The specificity of histamine release, skin prick test, and RAST was 0.78, 0.69, and 0.63, respectively. The specificity of histamine release was better than RAST demonstrated by 95% confidence intervals. In conclusion, it was found that the histamine release test is a convenient diagnostic method and the study indicates a diagnostic value comparable to the common diagnostic methods in clinical allergy.
本研究的目的是比较基于玻璃纤维的嗜碱性粒细胞组胺释放试验与皮肤试验(Phazet)、放射性变应原吸附试验(Phadebas)以及支气管激发试验在过敏性哮喘儿童中的应用。该研究纳入了68名有外源性过敏性哮喘病史(对皮屑(猫和狗)和屋尘螨过敏)的儿童。对所有儿童均进行了皮肤点刺试验、放射性变应原吸附试验和组胺释放试验,并将支气管激发试验作为“真正过敏性哮喘”的参考标准。总共进行了81次变应原支气管激发试验,44名儿童出现了49次阳性激发反应。由于技术困难(抗IgE诱导的组胺释放率低),2.9%(2/68)的儿童无法进行组胺释放试验。各试验之间的一致性在76%至87%之间,差异无统计学意义。组胺释放试验与支气管激发试验之间的一致性最高(87%),其次是皮肤点刺试验与支气管激发试验(84%)以及放射性变应原吸附试验与支气管激发试验(80%)。计算了每个试验的敏感性和特异性。所有试验的敏感性均在90%至94%之间,差异无统计学意义。组胺释放试验、皮肤点刺试验和放射性变应原吸附试验的特异性分别为0.78、0.69和0.63。通过95%置信区间表明,组胺释放试验的特异性优于放射性变应原吸附试验。总之,发现组胺释放试验是一种便捷的诊断方法,该研究表明其在临床变态反应中的诊断价值与常用诊断方法相当。