Renegotiating GM crop regulation. Targeted gene-modification technology raises new issues for the oversight of genetically modified crops.
作者信息
Kuzma Jennifer, Kokotovich Adam
机构信息
Humphrey School of Public Affairs and Center for Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
出版信息
EMBO Rep. 2011 Sep 1;12(9):883-8. doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.160.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Renegotiating GM crop regulation. Targeted gene-modification technology raises new issues for the oversight of genetically modified crops.重新协商转基因作物监管。靶向基因编辑技术给转基因作物监管带来了新问题。
EMBO Rep. 2011 Sep 1;12(9):883-8. doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.160.
2
Ending event-based regulation of GMO crops.终结转基因作物基于事件的监管。
Nat Biotechnol. 2016 May 6;34(5):474-7. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3541.
3
A risk-based approach to the regulation of genetically engineered organisms.一种基于风险的转基因生物监管方法。
Nat Biotechnol. 2016 May 6;34(5):493-503. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3568.
4
Regulatory regimes for transgenic crops.转基因作物的监管制度。
Nat Biotechnol. 2005 Jul;23(7):785; author reply 787-9. doi: 10.1038/nbt0705-785a.
5
Genetically modified crops: methodology, benefits, regulation and public concerns.转基因作物：方法、益处、监管及公众关注的问题。
Br Med Bull. 2000;56(1):62-73. doi: 10.1258/0007142001902978.
6
Gene technology regulation in Australia: a decade of a federal implementation of a statutory legal code in a context of constituent states taking divergent positions.澳大利亚的基因技术监管：在联邦实施法定法规的十年中，各州采取了不同的立场。
GM Crops Food. 2012 Jan-Mar;3(1):21-9. doi: 10.4161/gmcr.18606.
7
Genetically modified (GM) crops: milestones and new advances in crop improvement.转基因作物：作物改良的里程碑和新进展。
Theor Appl Genet. 2016 Sep;129(9):1639-55. doi: 10.1007/s00122-016-2747-6. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
8
Opinion: EU biotech regulations stall agricultural improvements in developing countries.观点：欧盟的生物技术法规阻碍了发展中国家的农业发展。
Biotechnol J. 2007 Jun;2(6):670. doi: 10.1002/biot.200790065.
9
Going to ridiculous lengths--European coexistence regulations for GM crops.走向荒谬的极端——欧洲转基因作物共存法规
Nat Biotechnol. 2010 Feb;28(2):133-6. doi: 10.1038/nbt0210-133.
10
Biotechnology executive order opens door for regulatory reform and social acceptance of genetically engineered microbes in agriculture.生物技术行政命令为农业中基因工程微生物的监管改革和社会接受打开了大门。
GM Crops Food. 2024 Dec 31;15(1):248-261. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2024.2381294. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
引用本文的文献
1
Parameters, practices, and preferences for regulatory review of emerging biotechnology products in food and agriculture.食品和农业领域新兴生物技术产品监管审查的参数、做法和偏好。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Sep 28;11:1256388. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1256388. eCollection 2023.
2
Application of Nanotechnology in Plant Genetic Engineering.纳米技术在植物基因工程中的应用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Oct 2;24(19):14836. doi: 10.3390/ijms241914836.
3
Processes for regulating genetically modified and gene edited plants.用于调控转基因和基因编辑植物的方法。
GM Crops Food. 2023 Dec 31;14(1):1-41. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2023.2252947. Epub 2023 Sep 10.
4
Regulation and safety measures for nanotechnology-based agri-products.基于纳米技术的农产品的监管与安全措施。
Front Genome Ed. 2023 Jun 21;5:1200987. doi: 10.3389/fgeed.2023.1200987. eCollection 2023.
5
Modulation of Phototropin Signalosome with Artificial Illumination Holds Great Potential in the Development of Climate-Smart Crops.利用人工光照调控向光素信号体在气候智能型作物的培育中具有巨大潜力。
Curr Genomics. 2021 Oct 18;22(3):181-213. doi: 10.2174/1389202922666210412104817.
6
Towards inclusive social appraisal: risk, participation and democracy in governance of synthetic biology.迈向包容性社会评估：合成生物学治理中的风险、参与和民主
BMC Proc. 2018 Jul 19;12(Suppl 8):15. doi: 10.1186/s12919-018-0111-3. eCollection 2018.
7
Is biotechnology (more) acceptable when it enables a reduction in phytosanitary treatments? A European comparison of the acceptability of transgenesis and cisgenesis.当生物技术能够减少植物检疫处理时，它（是否更）可接受？一项关于转基因和基因编辑技术在欧洲可接受性的比较。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 6;12(9):e0183213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183213. eCollection 2017.
8
Is it only the regulatory status? Broadening the debate on cisgenic plants.仅仅是监管地位的问题吗？拓展关于顺基因植物的辩论。
Environ Sci Eur. 2017;29(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12302-017-0120-2. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
9
Essential Features of Responsible Governance of Agricultural Biotechnology.农业生物技术负责任治理的基本特征。
PLoS Biol. 2016 May 4;14(5):e1002453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002453. eCollection 2016 May.
10
The Regulatory Status of Genome-edited Crops.基因组编辑作物的监管状况。
Plant Biotechnol J. 2016 Feb;14(2):510-8. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12444. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
本文引用的文献
1
Genome editing in plant cells by zinc finger nucleases.锌指核酸酶在植物细胞中的基因组编辑。
Trends Plant Sci. 2010 Jun;15(6):308-21. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.03.001. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
2
Evaluating oversight systems for emerging technologies: a case study of genetically engineered organisms.评估新兴技术的监督系统：以基因工程生物体为例。
J Law Med Ethics. 2009 Winter;37(4):546-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00431.x.
3
The public option. A possible change in US regulatory protocol for genetically modified organisms: compromised or enhanced objectivity?公众选择。美国转基因生物监管方案的可能变化：客观性受损还是增强？
EMBO Rep. 2009 Dec;10(12):1288-93. doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.250. Epub 2009 Nov 13.
4
Genetic modification through oligonucleotide-mediated mutagenesis. A GMO regulatory challenge?通过寡核苷酸介导的诱变进行基因改造。这是转基因生物监管面临的一项挑战吗？
Environ Biosafety Res. 2009 Apr-Jun;8(2):57-64. doi: 10.1051/ebr/2009007. Epub 2009 Oct 16.
5
Heritable targeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease.利用设计的内切酶在玉米中进行可遗传的靶向诱变。
Plant J. 2010 Jan;61(1):176-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04041.x. Epub 2009 Oct 7.
6
Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases.使用锌指核酸酶对玉米作物进行精确的基因组修饰。
Nature. 2009 May 21;459(7245):437-41. doi: 10.1038/nature07992. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
7
High-frequency modification of plant genes using engineered zinc-finger nucleases.利用工程化锌指核酸酶对植物基因进行高频修饰。
Nature. 2009 May 21;459(7245):442-5. doi: 10.1038/nature07845. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
8
Risk assessment of genetically modified crops for nutrition and health.转基因作物对营养与健康的风险评估。
Nutr Rev. 2009 Jan;67(1):1-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2008.00130.x.
9
An integrated approach to oversight assessment for emerging technologies.新兴技术监督评估的综合方法。
Risk Anal. 2008 Oct;28(5):1197-220. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01086.x. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
10
Upstream oversight assessment for agrifood nanotechnology: a case studies approach.农业食品纳米技术的上游监管评估：一种案例研究方法。
Risk Anal. 2008 Aug;28(4):1081-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01071.x. Epub 2008 Jul 4.
Zotero 插件