Department of Management, Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, Bloomington, 47405, USA.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:539-69. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
Despite the concern that has been expressed about potential method biases, and the pervasiveness of research settings with the potential to produce them, there is disagreement about whether they really are a problem for researchers in the behavioral sciences. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to explore the current state of knowledge about method biases. First, we explore the meaning of the terms "method" and "method bias" and then we examine whether method biases influence all measures equally. Next, we review the evidence of the effects that method biases have on individual measures and on the covariation between different constructs. Following this, we evaluate the procedural and statistical remedies that have been used to control method biases and provide recommendations for minimizing method bias.
尽管人们对潜在的方法偏差表示关注,并且研究环境普遍存在产生这些偏差的可能性,但对于它们是否真的是行为科学研究人员的一个问题,仍存在分歧。因此,本综述的目的是探讨当前关于方法偏差的知识状况。首先,我们探讨了“方法”和“方法偏差”这两个术语的含义,然后我们考察了方法偏差是否平等地影响所有测量。接下来,我们回顾了方法偏差对个别测量以及不同结构之间的共变的影响的证据。在此之后,我们评估了已用于控制方法偏差的程序和统计补救措施,并提供了最小化方法偏差的建议。